Benefits of the Social Web: How Can It Help My Museum?

Benefits of the Social Web: How Can It Help My Museum? Brian Kelly UKOLN University of Bath Bath, UK UKOLN is supported by: This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 licence (but note caveat) Acceptable Use Policy Recording of this talk, taking photos, discussing the content using email, instant messaging, blogs, SMS, etc. is permitted providing distractions to others is minimised. Resources bookmarked using ‘ aim-2009 ' tag http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/cultural-heritage/events/aim-2009/ Email: [email_address] Twitter: http://twitter.com/briankelly/ Blog: http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/

Using Tools I Talk About
Use of Web 2.0 technologies & approaches:
RSS feeds for structured information
Geo-location data
Exploitation of 3 rd party services
Openness of resources
Risk assessment / management approaches
Talks given in 2008 covered Web 2.0, accessibility & standards. Introduction Note also use of blogs, video blogs, YouTube, Twitter, …

Web 2.0
What Is Web 2.0?
Marketing term (derived from observing 'patterns') rather than technical standards - “an attitude not a technology”
Web2MemeMap, Tim O’Reilly, 2005
Characteristics Of Web 2.0
Network as platform
Always beta
Clean URIs
Remix and mash-ups
Syndication (RSS)
Architecture of participation
Blogs & Wikis
Social networking
Social tagging (folksonomies)
Trust and openness
Web 2.0

Social Web: “ tools that enable people to create, share and connect with each other ”

Note the focus on the individual rather than the institution

Benefits of Web 2.0
Delivery Mechanisms (“network as platform”):
Global outreach : maximise impact of and engagement with ideas
Outsourced services : allowing organisations to focus on their strengths and small institutions to engage on more equal terms
Exploits infrastructure : the standards (e,g. RSS) & services (Google, Amazon, ..) now in place
User Benefits:
User can create content
Can comment on other’s content
Users no longer passive consumers of content

NLW Example (1)
National Library of Wales “ Shaping the future: The Library’s strategy 2008-2009 to 2010-2011 ”:
“ We propose taking advantage of new online technology, including … Web 2.0 services …
It is expected that the Library itself will provide only some specific services on its website. Instead, the intention is to promote and facilitate the use of the collections by external users, in accordance with specific guidelines.”
Example of use of Web 2.0 services embedded within a Welsh Assembly Government funded project

NLW Example (2)
Use of Web 2.0 at the National Library of Wales including:
Use of YouTube
Examples from guest blog post by Paul Bevan on UK Web Focus blog / Bridging Worlds 2008 paper, National Library of Singapore http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykCAxSqziFY

NLW Example (3)
Use of Web 2.0 at the National Library of Wales including:
Use of YouTube
Use of Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/groups/cymru-wales/

NLW Example (4)
Use of Web 2.0 at the National Library of Wales. Wales, including:
Use of YouTube
Use of Flickr
Use of a community Wiki
http://www.ourwales.org.uk/index.php?...

Museum Example (1)
Example of a museum making using Facebook:
Surfacing content in places people visit
Allowing visitors to be ‘fans’
Easy to access on mobile devices
…

Museum Example (2)
Example of a museum making using Flickr:
Content embedded on organisation Web site
Use of rich 3 rd party user interface
Content also surfaced content in places people visit and comment
…

Museum Example (3)
Social Web isn’t just for visitors – it’s also used to support communities of practice:
Blogs/RR
Twitter
Wordle
Bookmarks
…

Twitter - Supporting a CoP
Twitter:
Used by early adopters at MW2007
Now becoming mainstream
Uses by professionals being identified
Possible uses:
Multiple discussions at conferences
Amplified conferences (cf #CILIP2)
Supporting distributed communities of practice

Twitter – Delivering a Service
The Historic Royal Palaces use Twitter for Henry VIII’s 500 th anniversary – picked up by the Telegraph

Twitter & User Engagement
Museums & heritage bodies are now following tweets and responding.
Being user-focussed & innovative or spooky?
See <http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/cultural-heritage/2009/05/06/>

What Can Twitter Offer?
The Tweetdeck client for the Twitter micro-blogging application

Recognising The Barriers CyMAL (Newport) workshop Sep 2009 Concerns identified in discussion group sessions at various UKOLN 1-day workshops for the cultural heritage sector CyMAL (Bangor) workshop Sep 2009

The Challenges Challenges Resources Expertise Time Money Understanding Legal Issues IT Services Colleagues Management Accessibility Sustainability Reliability Cultural issues Technical Issues Interoperability Privacy, DPA, FOI, .. Council OK, there are barriers. Does this mean we don’t do anything?

Take-up Of New Technologies
The Gartner curve
Developers Rising expectations Trough of despair Service plateau Enterprise software Large budgets … Early adopters
Chasm
Failure to go beyond developers & early adopters (cf Gopher)
Need for:
Advocacy
Listening to users
Addressing concerns
Deployment strategies
…
This talk looks at approaches for avoiding the chasm & reshaping the curve

The Backlash Is Predictable
When significant new things appear:
Enthusiasts / early adopters predict a transformation of society
Sceptics outline the limitations & deficiencies
There’s a need to:
Promote the benefits to the wider community (esp. those willing to try if convinced of benefits)
Be realistic and recognise limitations
Address inappropriate criticisms
Web 2.0: It’s a silly name. It’s just a marketing term. There are lots of poor Web 2.0 services. There wasn’t a Web 1.0. What follows it? It does have a marketing aspect – and that’s OK. It isn’t formally defined – it describes a pattern of related usage. There will be poor (and good) Web 2.0 services – just like anything else. Any usage will arrive at a follow-up term. Twitter? Another silly name. Trivial junk. Only for people with nothing better evolves to We must have a Twitter feed – impact; marketing; audiences; … and then (from the early adopters) It was meant to be fun. It’s been institutionalised, We want it back!

Beware The IT Fundamentalists
We need to avoid simplistic solutions to the complexities:
Open Standards Fundamentalist: we just need XML
Open Source Fundamentalist: we just need Linux
Ownership Fundamentalist: must own everything we use
Vendor Fundamentalist: we must use next version of our enterprise system (and you must fit in with this)
Accessibility Fundamentalist: we must do WAI WCAG
User Fundamentalist: must do whatever users want
Legal Fundamentalist: it breaches copyright, …
Perfectionist : It doesn't do everything, so we'll do nothing
Simplistic Developer : I've developed a perfect solution – I don't care if it doesn't run in the real world
Web 2.0 : It’s new; its cool!
Organisational culture

The Librarian Fundamentalists
Librarians who have failed to evolve:
Think they know better than the user e.g. they don't like people using Google Scholar; they should use Web of Knowledge (who cares that users find it easier to use Google Scholar & finds references they need that way?)
Think that users should be forced to learn Boolean searching & other formal search techniques because this is good for them (despite Sheffield's study).
Don't want the users to search for themselves (cf folksonomies) because they won't get it right.
They still want to classify the entire Web - despite the fact that users don't use their lists of Web links.
Want services to be perfect before they release them to users. They are uneasy with the concept of 'forever beta' (they don't believe that users have the ability to figure things out themselves and work around the bugs).
Organisational culture

From ‘Curator Coelacanth’ to ‘Curator Sapiens’
Curator Coelancanth:
Rarely spotted in the wild (sometimes found in the depths of the museum). “ almost worthless ” - species that failed to take risks & evolve.
How should the museum profession evolve? Curator Raptor: Terrifying beast, rapidly destroying many of its competitors. However destruction of IT Servitus proved its own undoing. Species in grave danger of becoming extinct following an inability to respond to the rapidly changing climate. Curator Sapiens: Not as intimidating as its predecessor but has the agility & mental capacity to respond quickly to changing environment 

Let’s Be Realistic
Want to provide a safe social networking environment?
You can with Ning.
But what of the pitfalls? “ Am I bovvered?” Over-hyping expectations

The Council Firewall
The reality:
Useful Web services do get blocked
There is dodgy/illegal/ dangerous material on the Web
It may be simple to have a blanket ban
Suggested approaches:
We accept certain risks
More sophisticated responses are needed (cf Childnet and Digizen )
We should share the approaches we’ve taken
New Internet access policy for children From December 2008, children will be able to enjoy improved Internet access in all Portsmouth Libraries. The current “Walled Garden” arrangement will be discontinued. The Internet access offered will be similar to that provided in Portsmouth schools but we will also be allowing access to games, Web chat and social networking sites. For further information, please contact Patricia Garrett on … Should the sector (a) welcome bans to dodgy places or (b) seek to open access and educate users? Organisational barriers

Some Concerns
Sustainability
What happens if Web 2.0 services:
Are unreliable?
Change their terms & conditions (e.g. start charging)?
Become bankrupt
Interoperability
What happens with Web 2.0 services if:
You can’t get the data back out?
You only get the unstructured or poor quality data back out?
You can’t get the comments, annotations, tags out?
Sustainability / Interoperability Again, this can happen within our sector (e.g. AHDS)

Support Issues
I don’t have the time to:
Understand it all
Use the technologies
Embed technologies in daily working practices
Train my colleagues
Common Craft video clips
You can:
View them at work
Listen to the podcast on the Tube
Use them in training
Training & staff development

Deployment Strategies
I want to do use the Social Web but:
The IT Services department bans it
The council bans it
My boss doesn’t approve
Area of interest to UKOLN:
“ Just do it”
Subversive approach – ‘Friends of Foo’ if Foo can’t use it
Encourage enthusiasts
Don’t get in the way
UKOLN briefing papers available with Creative Commons licence. (over 40 docs published) Training & staff development

Deployment Strategies
Interested in using Web 2.0 in your organisation?
Worried about corporate inertia, power struggles, etc?
There’s a need for a deployment strategy:
Addressing business needs
Low-hanging fruits
Encouraging the enthusiasts (don’t get in the way)
Gain experience of the browser tools – and see what you’re missing!
Staff training & development
Address areas you feel comfortable with
Impact analysis and assessment
Risk and opportunity management strategy
…

Use Netvibes! (or similar)
Suggestion:
Signup (for free)
Import RSS feeds for your areas of interest
No time? Unsubscribe form a few mailing lists!
Low-hanging Fruit

Use Your Mobile Devices!
Understand mobile technologies using devices you own:
If you’ve got a smart phone or WiFi device use it to gain an understanding of the potential
If you’ve got a Vodafone contract, you can have Twitter posts delivered to your phone for free
If you’ve got a portable MP3 player, you can listen to podcasts while you are on the Tube
If you haven’t got an iPod Touch, ask for one for your birthday 
Low-hanging Fruit

Create RSS Feeds
You may have a home page like this:
About the organisation
Key links
News items
Low-hanging Fruit Your news items are important – content that changes But is your news available as RSS? If it isn’t it is trapped inside your Web site  NB blog software can be used to create RSS

Have A Blog
Set up a blog.
Easy to create (e.g. Blogger, Wordpress, …)
You have staff who care
You can try it:
For fixed-term event
For internal purposes
You can easily learn more:
UKOLN’s cultural heritage briefing document (~10 of blogs and blogging)
Low-hanging Fruit
Still unconvinced?
Try Posterous (you can use email, can’t you?)
Explain why you don’t want to engage with your users!

Check Your Wikipedia Entry
Check you have an entry in Wikipedia – if not, you are probably missing out on Web traffic
Low-hanging Fruit
Check your Wikipedia entry:
Is it accurate?
Is it appealing?
Check the history of the entry:
When was it created?
How has it changed?
What did the original entry say?
How long might this have been the first thing Google users saw?
Might this have been counter-productive?

Perhaps Have a Facebook Page
It is simple to create a Facebook group page for your museum
Popular area
Syndicate content
Engage with users
…
But remember other issues:
Users
Sustainability
Work flow
…

What Next?
Beyond the low-hanging fruit what else can you do?
Risks and Opportunities Framework
‘Critical Friends’ and friendly critics
Working as a community & making use of the social networks (which get better as the number of users increase)
Engage with the challenges (the council firewall?)
To be explored in workshop sessions

Conclusions The future is exciting - but Curator Sapiens will need to address the challenges. Acknowledgments to Michael Edson for the Web Tech Guy and Angry Staff Person post / comic strip

Benefits of the Social Web: How Can It Help My Museum?

by Brian Kelly on Jun 10, 2009

Accessibility

Categories

Tags

Upload Details

Usage Rights

2 Embeds 38

Statistics

Benefits of the Social Web: How Can It Help My Museum? — Presentation Transcript

http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk	36
http://www.ukoln.ac.uk	2