Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Creekview Middle School Findings Eagle Mountain-Saginaw ISD
Agenda <ul><li>Introduction </li></ul><ul><li>What is a Star Chart </li></ul><ul><li>STaR Chart Components </li></ul><ul><...
Introduction <ul><li>Mary Craft </li></ul><ul><li>6 th /7 th  Grade Science teacher </li></ul><ul><li>Creekview Middle Sch...
What is a STaR Chart? <ul><li>It is designed to help campuses evaluate progress toward  short and long term technology goa...
Four Components of the STaR Chart <ul><li>Teaching and Learning </li></ul><ul><li>Educator Preparation and Development </l...
Classifications <ul><li>Four Levels: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Early Tech </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Developing Tech </li></ul...
  Teaching and Learning Assesses… <ul><ul><li>Patterns of classroom use </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Frequency and design of...
Creekview’s Results Year STaR Classification 2008-2009 Dev eloping Tech-14 2006-2007 Developing Tech-15 2005-2006 Developi...
Interpretation of Results <ul><li>Only a one point increase in teaching and learning </li></ul><ul><li>More progress needs...
  Educator Preparation and Development Assesses. . .  <ul><li>Content of professional development </li></ul><ul><li>Models...
Creekview’s Results Year STaR Classification 2008-2009 Dev eloping Tech-12 2006-2007 Developing Tech-14 2005-2006 Advanced...
Interpretation of Results <ul><li>Educator preparation has decreased over the past four years. </li></ul><ul><li>To improv...
Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support Assesses. . .  <ul><li>Leadership and vision </li></ul><ul><li>Planni...
Creekview’s Results Year STaR Classification 2008-2009 Advanced Tech-17 2006-2007 Advanced Tech-16 2005-2006 Advanced Tech...
Interpretation of Results <ul><li>Overall show 4 points of improvement </li></ul><ul><li>Almost at Target Tech level </li>...
Infrastructure for Technology Assesses. . .  <ul><li>Students per computer </li></ul><ul><li>Internet Access </li></ul><ul...
Creekview’s Results Year STaR Classification 2008-2009 Advanced Tech-16 2006-2007 Advanced Tech-20 2005-2006 Advanced Tech...
Interpretation of Results <ul><li>We are improving slightly </li></ul><ul><li>Almost at Target Tech level </li></ul><ul><l...
Overall Results for CMS 2008-2009  2007-2008  2006-2007
STaR Chart Conclusion <ul><li>We still have work to do </li></ul><ul><li>1 st  Area of focus should be teaching and learni...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

STaR Chart

209

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
209
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "STaR Chart"

  1. 1. Creekview Middle School Findings Eagle Mountain-Saginaw ISD
  2. 2. Agenda <ul><li>Introduction </li></ul><ul><li>What is a Star Chart </li></ul><ul><li>STaR Chart Components </li></ul><ul><li>Classifications </li></ul><ul><li>Overall Results </li></ul><ul><li>Conclusion </li></ul>
  3. 3. Introduction <ul><li>Mary Craft </li></ul><ul><li>6 th /7 th Grade Science teacher </li></ul><ul><li>Creekview Middle School </li></ul>
  4. 4. What is a STaR Chart? <ul><li>It is designed to help campuses evaluate progress toward short and long term technology goals. </li></ul><ul><li>Teachers on every campus complete a STaR Chart at the end of every school year. </li></ul><ul><li>The data is published by the state and school districts can evaluate the results. </li></ul><ul><li>Star Chart Website </li></ul>
  5. 5. Four Components of the STaR Chart <ul><li>Teaching and Learning </li></ul><ul><li>Educator Preparation and Development </li></ul><ul><li>Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support </li></ul><ul><li>Infrastructure for Technology </li></ul>
  6. 6. Classifications <ul><li>Four Levels: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Early Tech </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Developing Tech </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Advanced Tech </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Target Tech </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. Teaching and Learning Assesses… <ul><ul><li>Patterns of classroom use </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Frequency and design of instructional setting </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Content area connections </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Technology Application TEKS Implementation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Student mastery of technology applications </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Online Learning </li></ul></ul>
  8. 8. Creekview’s Results Year STaR Classification 2008-2009 Dev eloping Tech-14 2006-2007 Developing Tech-15 2005-2006 Developing Tech-13
  9. 9. Interpretation of Results <ul><li>Only a one point increase in teaching and learning </li></ul><ul><li>More progress needs to be made </li></ul><ul><li>Higher level thinking skills needed </li></ul>
  10. 10. Educator Preparation and Development Assesses. . . <ul><li>Content of professional development </li></ul><ul><li>Models of professional development </li></ul><ul><li>Capabilities of educators </li></ul><ul><li>Access to professional development </li></ul><ul><li>Levels of understanding </li></ul><ul><li>Access to online learning </li></ul>
  11. 11. Creekview’s Results Year STaR Classification 2008-2009 Dev eloping Tech-12 2006-2007 Developing Tech-14 2005-2006 Advanced Tech-17
  12. 12. Interpretation of Results <ul><li>Educator preparation has decreased over the past four years. </li></ul><ul><li>To improve we must: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Have more professional development in technology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Increase higher level thinking skills </li></ul></ul>
  13. 13. Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support Assesses. . . <ul><li>Leadership and vision </li></ul><ul><li>Planning </li></ul><ul><li>Instructional Support </li></ul><ul><li>Communication and Collaberation </li></ul><ul><li>Budget </li></ul><ul><li>Leadership and support for online learning </li></ul>
  14. 14. Creekview’s Results Year STaR Classification 2008-2009 Advanced Tech-17 2006-2007 Advanced Tech-16 2005-2006 Advanced Tech-13
  15. 15. Interpretation of Results <ul><li>Overall show 4 points of improvement </li></ul><ul><li>Almost at Target Tech level </li></ul><ul><li>To advance to target tech we must: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Collaborate </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Use various media formats </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Use budget to meet all technology strategies </li></ul></ul>
  16. 16. Infrastructure for Technology Assesses. . . <ul><li>Students per computer </li></ul><ul><li>Internet Access </li></ul><ul><li>Other Classroom technology </li></ul><ul><li>Technical support </li></ul><ul><li>LAM and WAM </li></ul><ul><li>Distance Learning Capacity </li></ul>
  17. 17. Creekview’s Results Year STaR Classification 2008-2009 Advanced Tech-16 2006-2007 Advanced Tech-20 2005-2006 Advanced Tech-15
  18. 18. Interpretation of Results <ul><li>We are improving slightly </li></ul><ul><li>Almost at Target Tech level </li></ul><ul><li>To get to Target Tech we must: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>1 to 1 access for students and computers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Have fully equipped technological classrooms </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Have technical support with a ratio of 1:350 </li></ul></ul>
  19. 19. Overall Results for CMS 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
  20. 20. STaR Chart Conclusion <ul><li>We still have work to do </li></ul><ul><li>1 st Area of focus should be teaching and learning </li></ul><ul><li>2 nd Area of focus should be Educator Preparation and Development </li></ul><ul><li>We can reach Target Tech in all four areas! </li></ul>
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×