HyperPhysics:Seat Belt Danger people have been killed by hanging seatbelts, When would you be better off not wearing your seatbelt?

  • 330 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
330
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API Heider Jeffer Is A PhD Student Mathematician And Theoretical Physicist • About: Science, Nature, Art, Music, Movies, Health, Fun, Beauty & Other Interests. All Hieder Social Networks At: Heider writing appeared At: • Stanford Center For Professional Development • U.S. Air Force engineers & scientists Heider Publications AT: HyperPhysics:Seat Belt Danger people have been killed by hanging seatbelts, When would you be better off not wearing your seatbelt? You need to download the latest version of flash player to use this player Need Help? ABOUT HEIDER APPLICATIONS PUBLICATIONS VIDEOS
  • 2. pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API Heider Web At: Heider codes At: Visit Heider At: • Avicenna youtube channel science, musics & films,Stanford & MIT lecture videos...etc! • Richard Feynman and Art. about arts ..etc! • Heider Online library Read Heider's online books for free! • Heider Cinema : watch online for free, Films, Documentaries , Tv Shows! • Heider Avicenna about vegan recipes and cooking...etc! Heider Social Box At: When would you be better off not wearing your seatbelt? Seatbelts danger: People have been killed by hanging seatbelts A story about this truck driver who narrowly avoided a fiery wreck by plunging his truck through the
  • 3. pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API gaurdrail and down a 100 meter cliff. If he had had his seatbelt on, he would never have been able to jump out at the last second and hang on to the gaurdrail. Maybe so. But the work-energy principle must be satisfied in every collision, and it dictates that the work done in stopping the driver must be equal to the driver’s kinetic energy. The shorter the stopping distance, the greater the impact force. And cases where the seatbelt would not lengthen your stopping distance and decrease your impact force are about as rare as this kind of accident. Rather than making judgements about safety from anecdotes like the one above, it is wise to consider the evidence from the large database on traffic fatalities. Seatbelt and Airbag for Safety While the driver with an airbag may experience the same average impact force as the driver with a good seatbelt, the airbag exerts an equal pressure on all points in contact with it according to Pascal’s principle. The same force is distributed over a larger area, reducing the maximum pressure on the body. RSS Random Archive Ask me anything Submit Mobile Effector Theme by Pixel Union
  • 4. pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API The presence of an airbag should not be used as justification for not wearing the seatbelt! The seatbelt keeps the driver from moving out of the position where the airbag is effective in capturing the driver and cushioning the impact. Protection by Seatbelts Vehicle Occupant Protection Device Effectiveness in Preventing FatalitiesCar Driver Lap/ shoulder belt 42 +/- 4%Car Right front passenger Lap/ shoulder belt 39 +/- 4%Car Left rear passenger Lap belt 19 +/- 10%Car Right rear passenger Lap belt 17 +/- 9%Motorcycle Driver Helmet 27 +/- 9%Motorcycle passenger Helmet 30 +/- 8% From Leonard Evans, “The Science of Traffic Safety”, The Physics Teacher 26, October 1988, Page 431, Table I.
  • 5. pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API Data on seatbelt effectiveness was obtained by comparing severe accidents in which at least one person was killed. An effectiveness of 42% for drivers with seatbelts means that a 42% reduction in fatalities would occur if all drivers wore seatbelts. Vehicle Mass and Accidents The more massive vehicle in a two-vehicle collision would be presumed to be safer since it would undergo less change in velocity during the collision. Not so evident is the fact that the more massive car is safer in a single-car accident. Leonard Evans collected data from the FARS database for a Fatality vs Mass comparison. His problem in assessing the rate of incidence of fatal accidents was to have a base for comparison since non-fatal single car accidents are not included in the database, nor are the number of cars in a given mass range. He used the number of pedestrian fatalities as a base, a “surrogate” for the number of serious accidents of all types, since it was presumed that the ratio of collisions with pedestrians to other types of collisions, e.g. with trees, would be similar for any mass class. It was also presumed that the pedestrian fatality rate would be more-or-less independent of car mass since even the lightest car is so much more massive than a pedestrian. The self-consistency of the curves for
  • 6. pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API different ages of driver offers some evidence of validity since their accident rates were much different. Trucks: more likely to ‘win’ in car crash Traffic Accident Data The U S Department of Transportation keeps data on traffic accidents including the Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS) with fatalities since 197 5 which number over a half million (averaging 45,000 per year in the US). Each year there are about 18 million property damage crashes with 1.7 million injuries. The risk of accidents for young drivers is greater in all categories of accidents, 18 yr olds having 400% more accidents than 40 yr olds. Analysis of such data permits reasonable estimation of factors which influence safety such as vehicle mass and the use of seatbelts. Some interesting human factors come into play. For example, given a severe crash, the driver of a 900 kg car is about 2.6 times more likely to be killed than the driver of an 1800 kg car. But overall data indicates that 1.7 times as many drivers of 900 kg cars are killed, compared to 1800 kg cars, indicating that drivers of light cars are more cautious and less likely to have such accidents. In seatbelt statistics, it must be factored in that persons who choose not to use seatbelts are more likely to have accidents out of a higher general bent toward risk taking. Source: Leonard Evans, “The Science of Traffic Safety”, The Physics Teacher 26, October 1988, Page 431. Trucks: more likely to ‘win’ in car crash Phil Frame, a spokesman for the National Transportation Safety Board, said that while large trucks are not part of most deadly wrecks, “they are overrepresented in the number of fatal accidents they are involved in.” In 1997 , they accounted for 9 percent nationally of all vehicles in fatal wrecks, but accounted for only 3 percent of all registered vehicles and 7 percent of total vehicle miles traveled, the national transportation statistics show.
  • 7. pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API "The greater mass vehicle almost always wins in a vehicle crash", Frame said. 7 8 percent of the people who died after collisions with big trucks were occupants of the other vehicle, and 7 5 percent of the people who were injured were in the other vehicle.” Excerpts from “Facts counter fear about big rigs”, by Jennifer Brett, Atlanta Journal. Spokesmen for the trucking industry are quick to point out that truck drivers are better trained, and safer drivers than the general public - and that is believable. But just the physics of collisions dictates that the occupant of the less massive vehicle is more at risk when a collision does occur. Why it’s better to be in the truck Truck Collision In a head-on collision the forces on the two vehicles are constrained to be the same by Newton’s third law. But from both Newton’s second law and the work-energy principle it becomes evident that it is safer to be in the bigger truck.
  • 8. pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API 1 The change in velocity of the driver will be the same as the truck in which he/she is riding. A greater change in velocity implies a greater change in kinetic energy and therefore more work done on the driver. Recent comments 1 day ago 0 Comments Share