System managementleverageopenstack
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

System managementleverageopenstack

on

  • 102 views

This is my new idea on improve distributed system management leveraging OpenStack.

This is my new idea on improve distributed system management leveraging OpenStack.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
102
Views on SlideShare
101
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.slideee.com 1

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • ES OneView, Pulsar, verify/reshape, procurve, collect info, real focus area. <br /> Why centralize.

System managementleverageopenstack Presentation Transcript

  • 1. © Copyright 2013 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. HP Restricted System management framework leveraging OpenStack Gary Duan
  • 2. © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.2 Agenda Problem Statement Our Solution Competitive Approaches Next Steps
  • 3. © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.3 Problem Statements  For physical machines in data center Deployment: Install/upgrade/re-install using PXE/chef/puppet System management: Vendor-specific solutions, Not compatible with other vendors’ hard wares HP’s OneView, Cisco’s UCS Mgmt System Enterprise Customized scripts/tools to monitor/control via SNMP, IPMI, etc Hardware diagnostics Vendor-specific solutions with their specific UI Scattered, vendor-specific, no unified interface  In OpenStack, hosts want being managed in a convennient way
  • 4. © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.4 Our Solution  Converged Management Framework  Deployment  Monitor/Management  Diagnostics  Is it possible to manage physical machines leveraging OpenStack?  OpenStack existing utilities Glance(Image Management) +Heat(Collaboration): Automation of Install/upgrade/re-install Ironic: Manage bare-metal: IPMI, SSH, PXE Ceilometer: Obtain info and status of target and notify upon events
  • 5. © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.5 Our Solution(Cont’d)  To be Done Framework Monitoring, Visibility, Alert, Failure Remediation, Management, Report, Deployment, Diagnostics Converged user interface and REST API display software/hardware info/status; manage physical machines, etc Plugin mechanism allow vendor to implement their specific features Obtain info/status to feed ceilometer-agent Allow vendors to implement their drivers for storage/switches, and even servers, besides WBEM; Customer can also define their monitor target/policies Management: power management, plan for down Online diagnostics: Define plugin interface; leverage WBEM/Heat Offline diagnostics: Define plugin interface; leverage EFI, leverage Heat (nice to have) Preventive hardware failure with big-data thinking: Failure probability curve of specific hardwares based on their use pattern, vendors’ data and datacenter’s data Failure probability of servers/hardwares based on datacenter’s data(public database or enterprise own database) Other popular preventive features
  • 6. © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.6 Competitive Approaches  Current Manage Softwares o Nagios(GPLv2): http://www.nagios.com/products/nagioscore o GoundWork: http://www.gwos.com/ o Zabbix: http://www.zabbix.com/ o Cacti: http://www.cacti.net/ o OpenNMS (GPL): http://www.opennms.org/wiki/Main_Page  Compare with Our solution o Brand, owned by small company V.S. OpenStack: vendors support, enterprise use o Just management, no deploy/diag V.S. Includes mgmt, deployment, diagnostics o Not easy to customize V.S. REST API, Plugin for monitor target and policy o Not include vendors’ specific hardware V.S. Plugin mechanism, allows vendor implement diagnostics
  • 7. © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.7 Next Steps  Tasks  Investigate enterprise’s system management solution more deeply  Make proto and PoC 1) First, targeted for hosts management in OpenStack 2) Then, extend to manage all machines in datacenters  Initiate an Open Source project for this  incubated/formal project of OpenStack
  • 8. © Copyright 2013 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. HP Restricted. Thank you
  • 9. © Copyright 2013 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Backup Slides
  • 10. © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.10 Puppet
  • 11. © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.11 Ceilometer