Nercomp 2012 rev1
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Nercomp 2012 rev1

on

  • 230 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
230
Views on SlideShare
230
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Amy ’s visit to departments, comments from faculty, anecdotal feedback from all constituencies.
  • Amy at Plymouth, saw a solution
  • Drastic changes in space needed; large space
  • Atomic Learning, the Tab and other changes….
  • Every institution will develop their own model IR Tab, Library Tab….the portal

Nercomp 2012 rev1 Nercomp 2012 rev1 Presentation Transcript

  • Merging UserSupport ServicesTechnology Help &Library Circulation
  • Situation • Technology Help Center focused on faculty & staff • Library staff constantly asked technology questions by students • Faculty demanding technology help for their studentsNERCOMP 2012 | 2
  • Location, location, location!NERCOMP 2012 | 3
  • It’s a Plan: CIO Vision• Technology & Library Support for students, faculty, & staff in one place• Single point of support for all Information Resources Services – One phone number – One emailNERCOMP 2012 | 4
  • Re-0rganize• The IRSC is created• First year: dual report• Afterward, report to Library DirectorNERCOMP 2012 | 5
  • First Conflict: Different Reporting • Technology Help Center reports to Academic Computing • Circulation Services is part of the LibraryNERCOMP 2012 | 6
  • Collaboration: Joint Project Development & Planning• Investigation of the Field – Listservs and interviews, articles• Consultants• Sharing documents with each other• Met with all managers, directors and Associate Provost• Began meeting weekly with the staff involved – To create a planNERCOMP 2012 | 7
  • Collaboration BeginsProcess Processing Change• Met weekly • Changing the service• Identified sub groups to focus on: model – student staffing & professional development, – staff professional development, – space, and • Changing location – What a merged organization would look like (we needed a new name)• Kept detailed minutes of issues, • Changing the space concerns, tried to address them at the meetings as they came up • Changing the organizational structureNERCOMP 2012 | 8
  • The ProcessBig Changes Opening August 2010• Cross training• Reconfigured phones and call center procedures• Shelving leaves the area• Organizational Change (AD and lead librarian) NERCOMP 2012 | 9
  • Open for BusinessNERCOMP 2012 | 10
  • Work in Progress • Attitude of ongoing change • Hired a lot more student workers • Assistant Director hired – Stabilized job descriptions • Staffing changes • Change in reporting structure • Building in flexibility • HelpSpot & other support technologyNERCOMP 2012 | 11
  • CelebrationNERCOMP 2012 | 12
  • Ongoing ChangeChanges in Year 1 +• Classroom Loans added to the service• More space changes• IRSC Advisory Team• After hours support – Developed Escalation Policy NERCOMP 2012 | 13
  • Successes and ….Lessons • Always a work in progress • Professional Development and ongoing training is a need • Internal & external outreach is importantNERCOMP 2012 | 14
  • The Future • Developing assessment • The role of library reserves • The impact on reference services • More librarian involvement in circulation procedures and module • Documentation • Student Worker training improvementNERCOMP 2012 | 15
  • Questions? Amy Berg, Associate Provost for Information Resources Gail Wood, Director of Libraries Lisa Kahle, Director of Academic Computing Services & Classroom Media ServicesNERCOMP 2012 | 16