Thorium-seed LENR network-Figs-Lattice Energy-Dec 7 2010
by Lewis Larsen on Dec 15, 2010
- 1,638 views
Two Figures and related images of bacterial nanowires and metal concentrations in a bacterial cell that accompany Lattice paper by Lewis Larsen concerning possibility of bacterial transmutations dated ...
Two Figures and related images of bacterial nanowires and metal concentrations in a bacterial cell that accompany Lattice paper by Lewis Larsen concerning possibility of bacterial transmutations dated December 7, 2010.
Accessibility
Categories
Tags
More...Upload Details
Uploaded via SlideShare as Adobe PDF
Usage Rights
© All Rights Reserved
Statistics
- Favorites
- 0
- Downloads
- 49
- Comments
- 1
- Embed Views
- Views on SlideShare
- 1,638
- Total Views
- 1,638
A new and I think potentially important article by Dubey & Ben-Yehuda just published in Cell is directly relevant to the following remarks made in this Lattice technical paper:
Quoting from Page #9: “What is shown above is a full ‘network‘ of nucleosynthetic possibilities; in any given situation in Nature, only a portion of this network may be operating at any given point time and/or at any particular geospatial location. Furthermore, some portions of the network may operate abiologically, whereas some or all of it may also operate biologically, albeit perhaps spread across a wide variety of different ecologically interacting species of microorganisms found in natural environments, e.g., Geobacter, Shewanella, etc.”
Quoting from Page #50 in the section tiled, Additional important questions for experimentalists : “ ... what network pathways are typically traversed, what organisms are involved in each segment of those pathways, and in what natural environments does/can such processes occur?”
In particular, please focus on the sentence, “ ... some portions of the network may...[be] ... spread across a wide variety of different ecologically interacting species of microorganisms found in natural environments, e.g., Geobacter, Shewanella, etc.”
If this statement were in fact true --- that is, if in Nature there was some sort of symbiotic ‘division of labor’ for different product-segments of microbial nucleosynthetic (i.e., LENR transmutation) networks that are naturally distributed amongst different species of coexisting bacteria (or cooperatively shared between individuals of the same species), one would expect to find/observe the following:
1. In controlled laboratory experiments, multi-species cultures of bacteria should exhibit higher apparent productivity of isotopic transmutation products as measured by various types of high-resolution mass spectroscopy.
Reported observations: Vysotskii et al. have in fact consistently observed that multi-species bacterial cultures seem to perform significantly better and longer in terms of producing measurably larger amounts of isotopic transmutation products over the course of a given experiment.
2. In order to physically transfer transmutation products between nucleosynthetically symbiotic bacterial cells, simple concentration gradient-driven diffusion of say, comparatively small numbers of transmuted metal ions (Fe in various oxidation states, etc.; e.g., extremely ‘valuable’ metal cofactors of enzymes involved in key aspects of metabolism) and/or much heavier/larger macromolecules (bound to metallic ions) between nearby cells would appear to be an inefficient and somewhat unreliable process for accomplishing such a task. It would seem more efficient and controllable for bacteria to have some sort of physical structures connecting nearby cells through which macromolecular-bound metallic ions could ‘flow’ and thus be transferred between nearby cells. If that were true, then one would expect to observe structures (probably tubular in geometry) physically connecting bacteria and intracellular material flowing through them.
Reported observations: well, as indicated in their title, “Intercellular nanotubes mediate bacterial communication,” Gyanendra Dubey and Prof. Sigal Ben-Yehuda (both at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem) have just published the first known experimental report of controlled laboratory observations of such structures and related cytoplasmic transfer in bacteria.
Full source URL = http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6WSN-526CVV3-5-1&_cdi=7051&_user=10&_pii=S009286741100016X&_origin=gateway&_coverDate=02/18/2011&_sk=%23TOC%237051%232011%23998559995%232911747%23FLA%23display%23Volume_144,_Issue_4,_Pages_455-626_(18_February_2011)%23tagged%23Volume%23first%3D144%23Issue%23first%3D4%23date%23(18_February_2011)%23&view=c&_gw=y&wchp=dGLbVzW-zSkWb&md5=34eb81580314bdbef55715be0cc1c5b3&ie=/sdarticle.pdf
TinyURL = http://tinyurl.com/4bge2en
Reference: Cell 144 pp. 590 – 600 February 18, 2011
Quoting directly from their Summary: “Using Bacillus subtilis as a model organism, we visualized transfer of cytoplasm fluorescent molecules between adjacent cells ... Electron microscopy revealed the existence of variously sized tubular extensions bridging neighboring cells, serving as a route for exchange of intracellular molecules. These nanotubes also formed in an interspecies manner, between B. subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus, and even between B. subtilis and the evolutionary distant bacterium Escherichia coli. We propose that nanotubes represent a major form of bacterial communication in nature, providing a
network for exchange of cellular molecules within and between species.”
My Comment: in addition to recently discovered bacterial nanowires that can transfer energy in the form of electricity between bacteria and/or between bacteria and inanimate objects located in their environment (as well as transmit information in the form of somehow encoded electrical signals), we now have what appear to be reliable observations of natural nanotubes that can transfer relatively large macromolecules and chemically encoded information between bacteria. Lewis Larsen, Lattice Energy LLC, March 5, 2011 1 year ago Reply