• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Globlal Perspective on Open Research: A Bird's Eye View
 

Globlal Perspective on Open Research: A Bird's Eye View

on

  • 1,492 views

Presentation at the University of Cape Town, Aug. 5, 2011. This talk was part of the OpenUCT initiative and the Scholarly Communication in Africa Programme. It provides an overview of the changing ...

Presentation at the University of Cape Town, Aug. 5, 2011. This talk was part of the OpenUCT initiative and the Scholarly Communication in Africa Programme. It provides an overview of the changing research landscape and the particular importance of open access and other forms of open collaboration for solving some of the pressing problems of development research. The presentation argues for the importance of policy development in support of research collaboration and the development of enriched metrics for evaluating the development impact of research.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,492
Views on SlideShare
1,491
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
15
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

https://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • metrics of total publications and citations.Top 15 countries account for 82% of total publicationsAuthor with African institutional affiliation account for less than 1% of global output, and S. Africa has the highest output. The rest are “invisible”Consequence of trying to publish in “International” journal results in neglect of important local problems and solutions that are appropriate for local conditions.
  • Consequences of publishing in “internatioanlly” indexed journals
  • he New Invisible College, Caroline Wagner combines quantitative data and extensive interviews to map the emergence of global science networks and trace the dynamics driving their growth. She argues that the shift from big science to global networks creates unprecedented opportunities for developing countries to tap science's potential. Rather than squander resources in vain efforts to mimic the scientific establishments of the twentieth century, developing country governments can leverage networks by creating incentives for top-notch scientists to focus on research that addresses their concerns and by finding ways to tie knowledge to local problem solving. T
  • Queensland University of Technology (QUT) adopted a whole institution approach in 2004. There is some early evidence that the greater visibility of the research of the institution correlates with other measures of research esteem.In Australia in recent years, several other universities have developed policies, most notably this week, ANU. A number of institutions in Europe — Leige, Salford, University College London, to mention a few — are examples. Perhaps most conspicuous is the mandate adopted at Harvard University Faculty of Art and Sciences.
  • Open access models are proliferating, not only for sharing traditional forms of scholarly production (peer-reviewed papers), but also among new forms of content, especially databases and media archives.Data are increasingly born digital
  • An entire range of economic services has emerged that are enabled by mobile phones: banking and anancial trans- actions, marketing and distribution, employment services, personal ser- vices, and public services. Beyond economic impacts, improvements are being made in other freedoms or dimensions of well-being: personal secu- rity, political participation and accountability, peace, dignity, and opportu- nity.

Globlal Perspective on Open Research: A Bird's Eye View Globlal Perspective on Open Research: A Bird's Eye View Presentation Transcript

  • Global Perspective on Open Research
    A bird’s eye view
    Leslie Chan
    International Development Studies
    Bioline International
    University of Toronto Scarborough
    Presentation at the Scholarly Communication in Africa Programme and OpenUCT,
    University of Cape Town
    August 5, 2011
  • What is research and why
    What is openness and why
    The values of Open Research
    How to enable Open Research
  • Arguments
    Quality filtering based on journal name is disappearing, to be replaced by new forms of “metrics” and reputation proxies
    Innovations are emerging from the “periphery”
    Networks and the return to the Invisible College
    Grass root actions are driving change, but policy framework is key to acceptance and sustainability
  • Why research?
  • The World of Journal Publishing According to Thomson’s ISI Science Citation Index
    Data from 2002
    http://www.worldmapper.org/display.php?selected=205
  • http://thomsonreuters.com/
  • $$$
    http://ke.thomsonreuters.com/#/index.html
  • “An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an unprecedented public good.”
    Budapest Open Access Initiative
    http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml
  • Human Development and Access to Knowledge-embedded goods
    Access to learning resources
    Access to journals
    Access to research and outcome data
    Access to health care
    Access to Medicine
    PUBLICGOODS
  • From “Big” science to Networked science
    Knowledge for local problem solving
  • Openness as the building block for the New Invisible College
  • "Like many parts of the knowledge system, the organization of scientific research is changing in fundamental ways. Self-organizing networks that span the globe are the most notable feature of science today. These networks constitute an invisible college of researchers: scientists who collaborate not because they are told to but because they want to, not because they work in the same laboratory or even in the same field but because they have complementary insight, data, or skills. Networks can take on the role of institutions in some parts of the world that do not have a long history of building scientific infrastructure."
    Caroline Wagner (2008), The New Invisible College: Science for Development. The Brookings Institution Press.
  • arXiv began its operations before the World Wide Web, search engines, online commerce and all the rest, but nonetheless anticipated many components of current 'Web 2.0' methodology… It continues to play a leading role at the forefront of new models for scientific communication."
  • http://www.scielo.org/
  • http://www.bioline.org.br
  • 23
    Active Bioline Journals graphed with Google Maps.
    Retrieved April 26, 2010 from: http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&msa=0&msid=117328677437228595850.00044ec490b69019e64a3&z=2
  • Institutional mandatory policies              112
    Departmental mandatory policies             28
    Funder mandatory policies                      47
    Total mandatory policies                   187
     
    http://www.openscholarship.org/jcms/c_6226/open-access-policies-for-universities-and-research-institutions
  • But Open Access is only the Substrate of theResearch Life Cycle
  • Scholarly Primitives
    “…basic functions common to scholarly activity across disciplines, over time, and independent of theoretical orientation.”
    John Unsworth. "Scholarly Primitives: What Methods Do Humanities Researchers Have in Common and How Might Our Tools Reflect This?" "Humanities Computing, Formal Methods, Experimental Practice" Symposium, Kings College, London, May 13, 2000.http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/~jmu2m/Kings.5-00/primitives.html
  • “Is the scientific paper a fraud?”
    “I mean the scientific paper may be a fraud because it misrepresents the processes of thought that accompanied or give rise to the work that is described in the paper. That is the question and I will say right away that my answer to it is ‘yes’. The scientific paper in its orthodox form does embody a totally mistaken conception, even a travesty, of the nature of scientific though”.
    Sir Peter Medawar
    (From a BBC talk, 1964)
    http://contanatura-hemeroteca.weblog.com.pt/arquivo/medawar_paper_fraud.pdf
  • Boyer’s Scholarship of
    PUBLIC
    Engagement
  • Traditional Business Models
    Subscription
    Licensing
    Pay-per-view
    Libraries
    Price
    $$
    Permission
    Closed Content
    Publishers
    Value-added
    Services
    BRANDING
    Capital
    Development
  • New Business Models
    Authority Trust Findability
    Personalization Immediacy
    Coherent and structured
    Generative layer
    Overlay
    services
    Open Source Open Access
    Fragmented
    and scattered
    Content layer
    Research
    Capital
    Development
  • “We are slowly, as I’ve written many times before, moving to post-publication peer review where the scientific community judges what matters—not bewigged and gathered in one elegant room as in the 18th century but connected globally through the internet. It’s back to our roots.”
    Richard Smith was the editor of the BMJ until 2004 and is director of the United Health Group’s chronic disease initiative. Competing interest: RS is on the board of the Public Library of Science but is not paid.
  • The JIF is appallingly open to manipulation; mature alt-metrics systems could be more robust, leveraging the diversity of of alt-metrics and statistical power of big data to algorithmically detect and correct for fraudulent activity. This approach already works for online advertisers, social news sites, Wikipedia, and search engines.
    http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/
  • Scholarly Primitives and Reputation?
    “…basic functions common to scholarly activity across disciplines, over time, and independent of theoretical orientation.”
    John Unsworth. "Scholarly Primitives: What Methods Do Humanities Researchers Have in Common and How Might Our Tools Reflect This?" "Humanities Computing, Formal Methods, Experimental Practice" Symposium, Kings College, London, May 13, 2000.http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/~jmu2m/Kings.5-00/primitives.html
  • http://kenya.ushahidi.com/
  • http://www.ushahidi.com/
  • http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10569081
  • http://appsfordevelopment.challengepost.com/
  • Conclusions
    Should not take Openness for granted, be vigilant
    Align the values of research with appropriate incentives and recognition
    Also need to align policies that are emerging from the top with initiatives are rising from the bottom