Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Emerging Trends in Scholarly Communication and Impact Measures in the Open Knowledge Environment
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Emerging Trends in Scholarly Communication and Impact Measures in the Open Knowledge Environment

485
views

Published on

Talk presented at the National Institute of Interdisciplinary Science & Technology (NIIST)(CSIR), Pappanamcode, Trivandrum, Dec. 17, 2012 …

Talk presented at the National Institute of Interdisciplinary Science & Technology (NIIST)(CSIR), Pappanamcode, Trivandrum, Dec. 17, 2012

Published in: Education

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
485
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Open access models are proliferating, not only for sharing traditional forms of scholarly production (peer-reviewed papers), but also among new forms of content, especially databases and media archives.Data are increasingly born digital
  • Open access models are proliferating, not only for sharing traditional forms of scholarly production (peer-reviewed papers), but also among new forms of content, especially databases and media archives.Data are increasingly born digital
  • Transcript

    • 1. Emerging Trends in Scholarly Communication and Impact Measures in the Open Knowledge EnvironmentNational Institute of Interdisciplinary Science & Leslie ChanTechnology Center for Critical Development Studies(NIIST)(CSIR), Pappanamcode, Trivandrum, Dec Bioline International. 17, 2012 University of Toronto Scarborough
    • 2. Key issues• Changing contexts of research discovery and dissemination in the digital environment• Why greater openness is good for science• Tensions between openness, quality measures, impact, and policies• Collaboration and competition• Interdisciplinary research• Deluge of research data• Interdisciplinary research
    • 3. Problems• Current Scholarly Communication system is broken• Emerging tools are not being used effectively to serve scholarship• Need to Re-design Scholarly Communications and Impact Measures
    • 4. The Dysfunctional Economy of Scholarly Communications • Commodification of public knowledge Bundling • Oligopoly • Artificial scarcity • Homogeneity of forms and functions • Reputation management
    • 5. Hacking the bundleExplore ways by which new practices can be coded(codified) so that the key functions of scholarlycommunication – authoring, certification, qualitycontrol, archiving, and rewarding - can be decoupledand better served by emerging tools for collaborativeauthoring, sharing, and reputation management.
    • 6. This is not just a technology issue, but a socio-political problem.
    • 7. “Is the scientific paper a fraud?” “I mean the scientific paper may be a fraud because it misrepresents the processes of thought that accompanied or give rise to the work that is described in the paper. That is the question and I will say right away that my answer to it is ‘yes’. The scientific paper in its orthodox form does embody a totally mistaken conception, even a travesty, of the nature of scientific though”. Sir Peter Medawar (From a BBC talk, 1964)http://contanatura-hemeroteca.weblog.com.pt/arquivo/medawar_paper_fraud.pdf
    • 8. But Open Access is only the Substrate of the Research Life Cycle Share Discover Create Gather
    • 9. Scholarly Primitives Discovering Annotating Comparing Referring Sampling Illustrating “…basic functions common Representing to scholarly activity across disciplines, over time, and independent of theoreticalJohn Unsworth. "Scholarly Primitives: What Methods Do HumanitiesResearchers Have in Common and How Might Our Tools Reflect This?" orientation.”"Humanities Computing, Formal Methods, Experimental Practice"Symposium, Kings College, London, May 13, 2000.http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/~jmu2m/Kings.5-00/primitives.html
    • 10. The JIF is appallingly open to manipulation; mature alt-metricssystems could be more robust, leveraging the diversity of of alt-metrics and statistical power of big data to algorithmically detectand correct for fraudulent activity. This approach already worksfor online advertisers, social news sites, Wikipedia, and searchengines. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/
    • 11. http://impactstory.org/
    • 12. Opportunities for Digital Scholarship Public outreach and engagement New forms of Service “impact”Student training Data sharing New scholarlyCuration practices Personalization Experimentations Interdisciplinary and Professional Collaborative development research
    • 13. Scholarly Primitives and Reputation? Discovering Annotating Comparing Referring Sampling Illustrating RepresentingJohn Unsworth. "Scholarly Primitives: What Methods Do HumanitiesResearchers Have in Common and How Might Our Tools Reflect This?""Humanities Computing, Formal Methods, Experimental Practice"Symposium, Kings College, London, May 13, 2000.http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/~jmu2m/Kings.5-00/primitives.html
    • 14. “Ten years of experience lead us to reaffirm the definition ofOA introduced in the original BOAI:By “open access” to [peer-reviewed research literature], wemean its free availability on the public internet, permittingany users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, orlink to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing,pass them as data to software, or use them for any otherlawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriersother than those inseparable from gaining access to theinternet itself. The only constraint on reproduction anddistribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain,should be to give authors control over the integrity of theirwork and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.”
    • 15. • OA benefits research and researchers, and the lack of OA impedes them.• OA for publicly-funded research benefits taxpayers and increases the return on their investment in research. It has economic benefits as well as academic or scholarly benefits.• OA amplifies the social value of research, and OA policies amplify the social value of funding agencies and research institutions.• The costs of OA can be recovered without adding more money to the current system of scholarly communication.• OA is consistent with copyright law everywhere in the world, and gives both authors and readers more rights than they have under conventional publishing agreements.• OA is consistent with the highest standards of quality.
    • 16. • 1.5. We discourage the use of journal impact factors as surrogates for the quality of journals, articles, or authors. We encourage the development of alternative metrics for impact and quality which are less simplistic, more reliable, and entirely open for use and reuse.• We encourage research on the accuracy of the new metrics. As the research shows them to be useful and trustworthy, we encourage their use by universities (when evaluating faculty for promotion and tenure), funding agencies (when evaluating applicants for funding), research assessment programs (when assessing research impact), and publishers (when promoting their publications). http://www.soros.org/openaccess/boai-10-recommendations
    • 17. • 3.14. We encourage experiments with new forms of the scholarly research “article” and “book” in which texts are integrated in useful ways with underlying data, multimedia elements, executable code, related literature, and user commentary.• We encourage experiments to take better advantage of the digital medium, and digital networks, for the benefit of research. http://www.soros.org/openaccess/boai-10-recommendations
    • 18. The IF is negotiable and doesn’t reflectactual citation countshttp://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291
    • 19. The IF cannot be reproduced, even if itreflected actual citations http://jcb.rupress.org/content /179/6/1091.full
    • 20. The IF is not statistically sound, even if it were reproducible and reflected actual citations http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf
    • 21. The IF are more effhttp://iai.asm.org/content/early/2011/08/08/IAI.05661-11.full.pdf+html?view=long&pmid=21825063
    • 22. http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4328
    • 23. http://total-impact.org/
    • 24. http://impactstory.org/
    • 25. Reputation is nested insocial networkUnderstanding influenceand engagement
    • 26. Scholarly Primitives and the Research Life Cycle Share Discover Create Gather
    • 27. Scholarly Primitives and Reputation? Discovering Annotating Comparing Referring Sampling Illustrating Representing “…basic functions common to scholarly activity across disciplines, over time, andJohn Unsworth. "Scholarly Primitives: What Methods Do HumanitiesResearchers Have in Common and How Might Our Tools Reflect This?" independent of theoretical"Humanities Computing, Formal Methods, Experimental Practice"Symposium, Kings College, London, May 13, 2000. orientation.”http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/~jmu2m/Kings.5-00/primitives.html
    • 28. Boyer’s Scholarship ofPUBLIC Discovery Engagement Teaching Integration Application
    • 29. "The scholarship of engagement means connecting the rich resources of the university to our most pressing social, civic and ethical problems, to our children, to our schools, to our teachers and to our cities..."Ernest Boyer in The Scholarship of Engagement (1996)
    • 30. Opportunities for Digital Scholarship Public outreach and engagement New forms of Service “impact”Student training Data sharing New scholarlyCuration practices Personalization Experimentations Interdisciplinary and Professional Collaborative development research
    • 31. Conclusions• Open access is only the substrate for digital scholarship, but an essential one• The academic reward system (citations) will slowly evolve to include data citations and software citations, as soon as they become as easy to handle as todays paper citations• Collaboration will be the norm, and apportionment of credit will be key• Participation in scholarly exchanges will be far more inclusive and democratic