ADMS 620 – IMPROVING SCHOOL PROGRAM AND  PERFORMANCE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FAIRFIELD MIDDLE SCHOOL   PRESENTERS: Leroy N...
FACTS ABOUT FAIRFIELD <ul><li>Location : Eastern end of Richmond,  Nine Mile Road </li></ul><ul><li>Student Pop.  2007 :  ...
PRESENTATION OF DATA 2004-2007 Math / Reading  by Gender -  Grades 6 & 7 constantly low;  Low of 13%; High of 32% - Increa...
English/ Math  by Ethnicity -Trend; fluctuation  -2006-07 all groups met schools 70% pass mark -Black’s performance low ex...
English /Math  [ Students with Disabilities, Econ. Disadvantage & LEP] -Students with disabilities= upward gradient  -LEP ...
WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIED <ul><li>Mathematics </li></ul><ul><li>Less than 5% of students in grades 6 & 7 passed at advanced st...
WEAKNESSES IN READING <ul><li>All grades and gender below 70% up to 2006. </li></ul><ul><li>73-81% 2006-2007 </li></ul><ul...
THE PLAN <ul><li>MATHEMATICS </li></ul><ul><li>45 mins. Math session daily. </li></ul><ul><li>Reward bookstore </li></ul><...
Timeline  Selling to Staff <ul><li>One year in the first instance with: </li></ul><ul><li>Teacher workshops </li></ul><ul>...
Community  Evaluation Involvement Procedures <ul><li>PTA-Spread the word, supervise work at home </li></ul><ul><li>Social ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Executive Summary

431
-1

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
431
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Executive Summary

  1. 1. ADMS 620 – IMPROVING SCHOOL PROGRAM AND PERFORMANCE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FAIRFIELD MIDDLE SCHOOL   PRESENTERS: Leroy N. Rowe and Lilicea H. Henry
  2. 2. FACTS ABOUT FAIRFIELD <ul><li>Location : Eastern end of Richmond, Nine Mile Road </li></ul><ul><li>Student Pop. 2007 : 1360 2008 : 927 </li></ul><ul><li>Faculty Members: 72 </li></ul><ul><li>Ethnic composition : Black 88.7%; Hispanic, White, Others: 11.3% </li></ul><ul><li>2008 Accreditation : Accredited with warning </li></ul><ul><li>AYP Status : 2005-08: Did not make AYP in Math & English </li></ul>
  3. 3. PRESENTATION OF DATA 2004-2007 Math / Reading by Gender - Grades 6 & 7 constantly low; Low of 13%; High of 32% - Increases, except grade 6F (3% decline in “07) -8F Achieved school’s pass mark. -No scores 2004-06 (?) Increase for all gender & grades, except for 8F in 2005-06 Grades 6 boys & girls equal in 2006-07 Female surpassed male in last year(gr 7 & 8) Largest Increase- grade 6M = 24% in 07 over 06 Year 6M 6F 7M 7F 8M 8F 2004-05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 64 79 71 2005-06 22/ 51 29/ 68 13/ 55 19 67 66 70 64 68 2006-07 32/ 75 26/ 75 28/ 63 24 81 <ul><li>73 </li></ul>71 78
  4. 4. English/ Math by Ethnicity -Trend; fluctuation -2006-07 all groups met schools 70% pass mark -Black’s performance low except 2006-07(2% above Whites). 2004-05 best year for all groups(Hispanic? 0%) - Pass rate improve in last year -All groups under 50%, except Hispanics Ethnicity 2004-05 English Math 2005-06 English Math 2006-07 English Math Black <ul><li>75 </li></ul>62 37 74 44 Hispanic 0 0 <ul><li>47 </li></ul><ul><li>52 </li></ul>White 81 91 69 45 72 49
  5. 5. English /Math [ Students with Disabilities, Econ. Disadvantage & LEP] -Students with disabilities= upward gradient -LEP best results(second language) -Ec. Dis. attained school pass mark 06-07 -Ec. Dis. 71% in 04-05(borderline pass) - Performance fluctuated -LEP no score for two years. Years L.E.P English Math Econ. Disad English Math Studs. w Disab English Math 2004-05 0 0 61 71 38 50 2005-06 73 0 59 30 47 32 2006-07 53 38 71 41 56 58
  6. 6. WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIED <ul><li>Mathematics </li></ul><ul><li>Less than 5% of students in grades 6 & 7 passed at advanced stage. </li></ul><ul><li>8 th grade 5-27% over 3 years. </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Bright idea! </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li> Improve advance passes in math. </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul>
  7. 7. WEAKNESSES IN READING <ul><li>All grades and gender below 70% up to 2006. </li></ul><ul><li>73-81% 2006-2007 </li></ul><ul><li>Inability to read affects performance in other subjects . </li></ul><ul><li>AIM-improvement plan </li></ul><ul><li>Encourage 2006-2007 performance. </li></ul><ul><li>Read one level above current grade level </li></ul>
  8. 8. THE PLAN <ul><li>MATHEMATICS </li></ul><ul><li>45 mins. Math session daily. </li></ul><ul><li>Reward bookstore </li></ul><ul><li>Math bingo </li></ul><ul><li>Internet activates </li></ul><ul><li>Working at stations </li></ul><ul><li>Elite Math Club </li></ul><ul><li>Math Academy </li></ul><ul><li>“ Train to Gain” </li></ul><ul><li>READING </li></ul><ul><li>Training Seminars </li></ul><ul><li>45-50 minutes tutoring </li></ul><ul><li>Resources Centre </li></ul><ul><li>Bookstore </li></ul><ul><li>Reading Club </li></ul><ul><li>Bi-weekly planning </li></ul><ul><li>Saturday Academy </li></ul><ul><li>After school tutoring </li></ul>
  9. 9. Timeline Selling to Staff <ul><li>One year in the first instance with: </li></ul><ul><li>Teacher workshops </li></ul><ul><li>Tutoring </li></ul><ul><li>Rewards Program </li></ul><ul><li>Establish clubs </li></ul><ul><li>Periodic evaluations </li></ul><ul><li>Motivational talks </li></ul><ul><li>Pep/Booster rallies </li></ul><ul><li>Pre- implementation planning </li></ul><ul><li>Department chairs & administrators educated </li></ul><ul><li>Review SOL results-commendations </li></ul><ul><li>Introduction to generally staff. </li></ul><ul><li>Rewards-Free gas, certificates, Teacher of The Year </li></ul>
  10. 10. Community Evaluation Involvement Procedures <ul><li>PTA-Spread the word, supervise work at home </li></ul><ul><li>Social Clubs/Church groups </li></ul><ul><li>Media & School News letters </li></ul><ul><li>Resource Persons, including retired teachers </li></ul><ul><li>On-going evaluation </li></ul><ul><li>Class tests </li></ul><ul><li>Data analysis </li></ul><ul><li>Bi-weekly planning & evaluation </li></ul><ul><li>Team Evaluation </li></ul><ul><li>Dept. mid year evaluation </li></ul><ul><li>SOL & HAT results analyzed. </li></ul>

×