Schemas

785 views

Published on

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
785
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
11
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Schemas

  1. 1. leo picadobackcountry.com
  2. 2. 1. What’s behind all of this?2. The past3. The present4. When?5. Our competition6. Schemas identified7. How to test it?8. FAQ9. More info
  3. 3. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/» browser » user
  4. 4. » Semantic Web (Web 3.0)» Help machines understand semantics semantics, yummy
  5. 5. 1. RDFa2. Microformats
  6. 6. » 2004: Mark Birbeck (W3C)» Part of XHTML 2.0» RDF in HTML attributes = RDFa» Attributes used: about, src, rel, rev, href, resource, property, content, datatype, typeof» Pros ˃ Publisher Independence ˃ Self Containment: HTML | RDFa» Cons ˃ XML based ˃ There is not a ‘standards body’ for formats ˃ A bit complex
  7. 7. - div: - standard namespace - item being coded- span: title- span: author- span: date
  8. 8. » 2007: Tantek Çelik, Dan Cederholm» ‘Support’ for both XHTML/HTML» Attributes used: class, rel, rev, id» Pros ˃ Simplicity» Cons ˃ Short list of elements (9 stable) ˃ Likes IDs! ˃ Accesibility issues http://bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs/2008/06/removin g_microformats_from_bbc.shtml
  9. 9. - div:- div: first name- div: organization name- div: telephone number- a: url
  10. 10. » Microdata» schema.org
  11. 11. » Part of the HTML5 spec» Delimited set of attributes: itemscope, itemtype, itemprop, itemref» Similar to RDFa’s take» Pros ˃ Publisher Independence ˃ Self Containment: HTML ˃ Attribute based ˃ Easy to implement» Cons ˃ Each site can use it’s own standards
  12. 12. » Google, Bing and Yahoo!» Uses HTML5 spec» Wide range of schemas (611 as of 10/11’)» Easily Nestable» Thing based
  13. 13. - div scope:movie- h1: name- div: director / scope:person - span: name - span: birthDate- span: genre- a: trailer
  14. 14. » where it makes sense (think SEO)
  15. 15. » REI is using schema.org» Altrec is using microformats» Sierra Trading Post is not using any.
  16. 16. 1. Webpage2. WPHeader3. SiteNavigation4. Store
  17. 17. 1. WPAdBlock2. Product3. AggregateRating4. Organization
  18. 18. 1. AggregateOffer2. InStock3. ImageGallery
  19. 19. 1. Review2. Person3. UserComments4. ImageObject5. VideoObject
  20. 20. 1. WPAdBlock2. WPFooter3. SiteNavigation
  21. 21. » Header: 4 | global» Content: 12» Footer: 3 | global» Total: 19
  22. 22. » how deep? ˃ “more is better, except for hidden text”» missing/implicit information? ˃ “meta tag it”» working with dates ˃ use the html5 tag <time>» can an itemprop be also a itemscope? ˃ hell yeah
  23. 23. » Google’s Rich Snippets Testing Tool ˃ http://google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets» Validator ˃ http://validator.nu/» Live Microdata ˃ http://foolip.org/microdatajs/live/
  24. 24. » http://slideshare.net/fabien_gandon/rdfa-in-a- nutshell-v1» http://microformats.org/wiki/Main_Page» http://schema.org/docs/gs.html

×