Dr Mary Keys A Policy Approach to Embedding Rights in Mental Health Services - Presentation Transcript
A Policy Approach to embedding rights in Mental Health Services: A Vision for Change and the experience in Ireland Irish Mental Health Coalition Conference, Dublin May 18 th 2009 Mary Keys, School of Law, NUI Galway
Introduction
Brief on Vision for Change
Implementing Vision for Change
The impact of current practices
Is legal action realistic?
Some possible explanations
The future
Conclusions
Real Life
Dave, aged 64 years, spent a number of years in a psychiatric hospital.
Discharged to a medium support hostel, his home for a number of years
Attended a day centre each day, paid rent from his DA
Difficulty with using the stairs -nursing home was proposed
Now lives in a nursing home and complains that he has no-one to talk to as many of the residents have communication difficulties
Vision for Change 2006 1
Framework for complete model of mental health service provision
Principle based and respect human rights
Holistic approach to mental health problems
Person centred approach based on Recovery ethos to inform every aspect of delivery
Service user as partner in own care plan- to reflect needs, goals and potential
Vision for Change 2
Service user involvement the norm in every aspect of service development and delivery- similarly with carers
Integrated multi-disciplinary approach to factors that contribute to mental health problems
Specialist community mental health teams to address needs across life span
Effective community service
Vision for Change 3
Managed by a National Directorate-working directly within the HSE
Locally by Mental Health Catchment Area Management Teams
Service provision to be prioritised on needs basis
Services should be meaningfully evaluated
Closure of all psychiatric hospitals
Implementation-who’s watching? Independent Monitoring Group 1
Vision cannot be implemented effectively without a National Mental Health Services Directorate
Has impeded progress on poor facilities
Inconsistent approach to embedding Recovery ethos in services
Absence of comprehensive implementation plan
Progress made on some priorities, child and adolescents, engagement with service users,
2009 Report- www.doh&c.ie
Implementation-Who’s watching ? 2 Inspector of Mental Health Services
Lumping all mhs tog. in PCCC + no Mental Health Directorate “caused confusion, misunderstanding, muddied mission, poor decisional capacity ”
Broad Impact –people admitted to institutions
No progress in resource equalisation
Lacking comprehensive community services
Impact of restrictive work practices
Implementation-Who’s watching? 3 Irish Mental Health Coalition
“ Late for a Very Important Date” progress painfully slow
No Mental Health Directorate
Children in Adult wards
HSE Implementation plan with lack of detailed commitments-finance, resources
HSE should publish quarterly reports of progress for the Implementation Group
The number of fully staffed Community Mental Health Teams are limited and not clear
Government commitment to ring fencing existing mental health funding
Real Life
Community in the Gaeltacht presented a purpose built house to the HSE for sole use of the mental health service (proposed in 2001)
Five service users, local Irish speakers selected-no comprehensive rehabilitation process
House furnished by HSE and ready for occupation in 2005
One person lives in a high support hostel, the other people remain in institutional care where between them they have spent many years of their lives
The house remains unused…
How is policy assisting their recovery and life potential?
Issues arising
Offer by an Independent sector to manage the service
What are the expectations?
Greater cost than the HSE original cost?
At least a good solid knowledge of current mental health policy?
At least a good solid knowledge of what the Recovery Ethos means?
Impact
Mental Health Act 2008-Dail Debate-Minister Harney “unthinkable” that anyone would lose his/her liberty because of a lack of supported accommodation
Has Dave lost his liberty, other five people?
Informed consent-is it a robust approach?
Does it include information on choices and possible disempowerment?
That his place in the supported accommodation will be gone?
Re-institutionalisation?
What are Dave’s options?
He is re-institutionalised in a generic service designed for some older people
Principles and values applying in mental health policy are lost to him
He is in a service that is not focused on his needs
What about his human rights, his everyday life activities, his Recovery?
Principles and Capacity
Least restrictive alternative
Dignity and respect
Capacity means: ( Proposed Scheme of Mental Capacity Bill)
the ability to understand the nature and consequences of a decision in the context of available choices at the time the decision is to be made
Best interests- ( Proposed Scheme of Mental Capacity Bill)
Applies when person is unable to decide
Person focused
Is legal action an option?
Olmstead v. Zimring 527 US (1999)
Costs of segregated institutional environment vs appropriate community-based care
R v. Nth & East Devon HA ex p Coughlan (2000) 3 AER 850
Person had a been assured of a home for life-she had a legitimate expectation- the decision to close her community residence for financial reasons was unlawful
Is legal action an option?
Courts are reluctant to get involved in directing how the public purse is spent
Rarely make mandatory orders-directing the government (HSE) to do something
If there are enforceable rights or specific agreements have been made and reneged on may make order then
Why is this happening?
Key issue- Political Motivation
No director for mental health at top level of HSE where key decisions are made
Unstable, fragmented and inappropriate structures in HSE
Local level very important but unless principles and values are recognised…
Bird’s Eye View
Are we witnessing the new generation of human rights abuses?
Moving people with mental health problems to nursing homes, or
Keeping them in institutions while the community service is available
The context is different from the 1800s and the institutions are smaller now…
Optimism
Office for Disability and Mental Health
Mental Health Inspector’s Report 2009
“ Sense of beginnings of a cultural shift in term of increased professionalism, accountability and awareness of importance of good governance
The central importance of service users/patients is increasingly recognised by clinicians
Human rights obligations increasingly understood” www.mhcirl.ie
Conclusion
Policy approach is not enough
Extreme caution and careful monitoring of local activities
Temptation to use established systems as finance in place –it must stop
State supported nursing home system-extraordinarily costly approach to “community care”
Recommendations
Immediate need for administrative/ management protocol
Advocacy/representation must be made available where any major changes like accommodation are proposed
Such decisions must be carefully addressed with the person
Staff managing and working in mental health services must become more aware of impact
0 comments
Post a comment