Publishing "Version of Record" Metadata

2,655 views
2,521 views

Published on

Discusses benefits of publishing "version of record" metadata to support understanding of authority assoicated with research publications. Also discusses kinds of metadata it would be useful to be able to share in this context.

Published in: Technology, Education
1 Comment
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Find coupons for your hosting. Get a promo deal before you purchase hosting http://vpsnet.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/vps-net-review/
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,655
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
25
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
17
Comments
1
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Publishing "Version of Record" Metadata

    1. 1. Publishing “Version of Record” Metadata Leigh Dodds Chief Technology Officer, Ingenta Charleston Conference, November 2007
    2. 2. Why?
    3. 3. For Analysis <ul><li>“ Given the importance of peer review in determining the allocation of career rewards and public resources, it deserves close scrutiny… </li></ul><ul><li>In this age of digital publication, the relevant data are increasingly available, and so it should be possible – at least in principle - to supplement opinion and anecdote with quantitative evidence.” </li></ul><ul><li>-- Charles G. Jennings, doi:10.1038/nature05032 </li></ul>
    4. 4. Enable New Tools
    5. 5. Enable New Tools Why is this search different? Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Duis ut magna. Praesent auctor lacinia lorem. Etiam consectetuer nunc a tortor….
    6. 6. Other Use Cases Only show me content that has been peer reviewed…
    7. 7. Other Use Cases Only show me content that has been peer reviewed… Find me the latest version of this article
    8. 8. Other Use Cases Only show me content that has been peer reviewed… Find me the latest version of this article Check whether any of the references in this paper have been retracted
    9. 9. What Should We Capture?
    10. 10. Article Metadata <ul><li>DOI </li></ul><ul><li>Basic Article Metadata </li></ul>
    11. 11. Publishing Workflow Events <ul><li>Submission </li></ul><ul><li>Acceptance </li></ul><ul><li>Published </li></ul><ul><li>Review Period </li></ul><ul><li>Errata </li></ul><ul><li>Retracted </li></ul>Picture by tico24
    12. 12. Process Description <ul><li>Simple human readable summary of review policy </li></ul><ul><li>Or a pointer… </li></ul><ul><li>Type of Review </li></ul><ul><li>None </li></ul><ul><li>Editorial Review </li></ul><ul><li>Single Blind </li></ul><ul><li>Double Blind </li></ul><ul><li>… etc </li></ul>Picture by Alpha six
    13. 13. Contributor Metadata <ul><li>At least: how many reviewers </li></ul><ul><li>Ideally: who were the reviewers </li></ul>gbilder.crossref.org
    14. 14. Associations <ul><li>Latest Revision or Manifestation </li></ul><ul><li>Alternative hosts </li></ul>Picture by Hao Ran
    15. 15. Research Quality Indicators <ul><li>Clinical Trial Standards </li></ul><ul><li>Protocols </li></ul><ul><li>Experimental Standards </li></ul><ul><li>Funding Sources </li></ul>Picture by lofaesofa
    16. 16. How?
    17. 17. How? <ul><li>For Both Humans & Machines </li></ul><ul><li>Learn from the Web community </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Incremental development </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Build on available data </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Simple policy statements </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Editorial management systems </li></ul></ul>Picture by nate steiner

    ×