Kiel stand presentation slides
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Kiel stand presentation slides

on

  • 758 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
758
Views on SlideShare
666
Embed Views
92

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
5
Comments
0

1 Embed 92

http://memphisschoolreferendum.blogspot.com 92

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Kiel stand presentation slides Kiel stand presentation slides Presentation Transcript

  • Community InformationMeeting: The Future of PublicEducation in Shelby County January 19, 2011 Daniel Kiel The University of Memphis School of Law
  • Shelby County Comparison: Government vs. Schools Shelby County  Shelby County Schools Government Serves ENTIRETY of   Serves only the portion of  Shelby County (including  Shelby County outside of  Memphians and non‐ the Memphis city limits Memphians)
  • Individual 1: The Memphian Votes for Member of PATH OF PROPERTY TAXES Memphis City School Board City of Memphis Taxpayer Children Assigned to Attend Memphis CityCity of Memphis  Shelby County  Schools Government Government
  • Individual 2: The Non‐Memphian PATH OF PROPERTY TAXES Votes for Members of Taxpayer Outside Memphis Shelby County School Board Shelby County  Children Assigned to Government Attend Shelby County Schools
  • Funding Sources Source (103,593 students) (47,342 students) State of Tennessee $428M $174M (49.5%) (50.7%) Shelby County Property Taxes $255M $115M (paid by all county residents – Memphian and non‐Memphian) (29.5%) (33.5%) Shelby County Sales Taxes $89M $43M (10.3%) (12.6%) City of Memphis Property Taxes  $84M N/A (paid only by Memphians) (9.8%) Other $8M $10M (1.0%) (3.0%)
  • Why Change the Status Quo?:  Interests of the Two Districts Continued Local  Sustainability in Control Funding
  • Strategy: SCS Conversion to  Special School DistrictCurrently: SCS is a “County” DistrictChanges if SCS Converted to Special School District oFrozen Boundaries oIndependent Taxing Authority oVeto Power Over Merger with Other School SystemsTo Create a Special School District: oLift Statewide Ban oLegislative Creation of New Special School District
  • Why Change the Status Quo?:  Interests of the Two Districts Continued Local  Sustainability in Control Funding
  • Strategy: Surrender of  MCS CharterMotivating Force: Funding Uncertainties oCity Contribution oCounty Contribution if SCS becomes Special School DistrictMeaning and Effect of Charter SurrenderTo Dissolve Memphis City Schools Charter: oSchool Board Surrender of Charter oCitywide Referendum
  • Step One: MCS Board Votes to  Surrender Charter (Dec. 20, 2010)Next Step: Citywide Referendum
  • What If…..the referendum succeeds?Impact on Funding:  Single-Source Local Funding – Shelby County Gov’tImpact on Governance: Merged District  Short-Term Uncertainty  Long-Term = Reconstituted County-wide BoardImpact on Students:  Transition Period to Hammer Out Details (for example, uniforms, staffing, textbooks, etc.)  New Board to Make Long-Term Decisions on student assignment, academic programs
  • What If…..the referendum does not succeed?Maintenance of Status Quo in funding and governanceShelby County Schools free to continue pursuit of SpecialSchool District status in state legislatureMemphis City Schools free to consider other agreementsto ensure sustainable funding
  • Current Sub‐IssuesContinued Negotiation Between the Districts oMCS Rejection of SCS Proposed AgreementLegislation that Could Change Current Landscape oState Legislature oMemphis City Council