SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 18
Telecommunications Law Overview January 27, 2011 – Professor Jack Lerner Guest lecturer: Lisa Borodkin
Background - Radio Ship to Ship Radiotelegraphy (37 Stat. 302 1912) Radio Act of 1928
Communications Act of 1934 Created FCC 5 Commissioners Appointed by the President One chief
Expansion to Television  The FTC Act was held to cover television in the 1950s Broadcast Cable Satellite IPTV “known or unknown, hereafter devised”
Title III Broadcast regulation To grant licenses to promote “public convenience, interest or necessity.” 47 U.S.C. § 307(2), 309(a)  Prescribe the nature of service Assign Frequencies Determine location of stations Prescribe qualifications of station operators No License can be granted to a foreign citizen – (310(a),(b))
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. V. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 (1969) First Amendment rights “personal attack” rule 1 week to respond Rationale was dominance of broadcast media and ability to drown out other voices
Common Carrier/Enhanced Services Distinction Basic Services – “Plain Old Fashioned Telephone” regulated tariffs Anything else, circa 1980 – “Enhanced” not regulated To be enhanced, can merely be subscriber interaction with stored information – e.g. 976 billing service for adult telephone service Enhanced services were deregulated and approved by the 11th Circuit – 1982 But the 9th Circuit found preemption invalid - 1990
MCI v. AT&T, 512 U.S. 218 (1994) Found that the FCC could not use discretion to tailor the Act and apply it to non-dominant exchange carriers like MCI One a service was found to have common carrier status, the full regulation of the Act applied, including tariff regulation
Rationale of the 1996 Act Reduce barriers to entry, deregulate and promote competition Added new sections 251 to 261 to Title II Imposed duties on Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (“ILEC”) Duty to interconnect Duty to resell on nondiscriminatory basis Duty to share networks
Title II of the 1996 Act 8 year limit on broadcast license (shortened from 15) Section 203 Allows for reconsideration of incumbent without considering competing applications (Sec. 204) Lapse if broadcaster fails to transmit for 1 year
Unbundling necessary network elements requirement Network elements are the physical wire loop from the telephone exchange to the customer’s premises Think about competition for long distance services
FCC’s Power - to Revoke License False statements Failed to operate within license Failed to provide access to political candidates Used license to distribute controlled substance
Satellite – Section 205 Jurisdiction over direct-to-home satellite Criminalizes interception and decryption of direct to home satellite broadcast
V-Chip technology -1988 Requires tvs greater than 13” to have V-chip technology to allow parents to block out violent, sexual or other programming
Trends – Deregulation because scarcity less of an issue Light regulation of IP-based services Packet-switching technology replacing circuit switched Reno v. ACLU, 521 U.S. 844 (1997) Refused to apply Red Lion to the Internet Because it was not characterized by scarcity Struck down part of the Communications Decency Act as unconstitutional (Section 230)
Network self-governance ICAAN – Network solutions Dispute resolution over domain names TLD Registrars Enforcement Issues Conflict of laws - .ly COICA – U.S. Customs
Private Rights of Action Violation of 47 U.S.C. Section 605 Violation of 47 U.S.C. Section 553
IPTV Issues Google TV Apple TV Content Providers under no obligation to provide content Hulu Fox withholding content from IPTV

More Related Content

What's hot

Broadcast Regulation
Broadcast RegulationBroadcast Regulation
Broadcast Regulation
Miriam Smith
 
1 telecom actomanen
1 telecom actomanen1 telecom actomanen
1 telecom actomanen
traoman
 
Laws & acts relating to the media industry
Laws & acts relating to the media industryLaws & acts relating to the media industry
Laws & acts relating to the media industry
Megan Hughes
 
Contact Center Compliance April 11 2012 FCC Webinar
Contact Center Compliance April 11 2012 FCC WebinarContact Center Compliance April 11 2012 FCC Webinar
Contact Center Compliance April 11 2012 FCC Webinar
Ryan Thurman
 

What's hot (20)

Telecommunications 2016: The Challenges Facing Local Government
Telecommunications 2016: The Challenges Facing Local Government Telecommunications 2016: The Challenges Facing Local Government
Telecommunications 2016: The Challenges Facing Local Government
 
Public Safety and Wireless Deployment
Public Safety and Wireless DeploymentPublic Safety and Wireless Deployment
Public Safety and Wireless Deployment
 
Local Government Revenues in a Broadband World: Rights-of-Way Compensation
Local Government Revenues in a Broadband World: Rights-of-Way CompensationLocal Government Revenues in a Broadband World: Rights-of-Way Compensation
Local Government Revenues in a Broadband World: Rights-of-Way Compensation
 
State Franchising and Renewal: What Happens Next?
State Franchising and Renewal: What Happens Next?    State Franchising and Renewal: What Happens Next?
State Franchising and Renewal: What Happens Next?
 
FCC Wireless Rulemaking - 2013
FCC Wireless Rulemaking - 2013FCC Wireless Rulemaking - 2013
FCC Wireless Rulemaking - 2013
 
Municipal Cable Franchise Transfer Toolkit
Municipal Cable Franchise Transfer ToolkitMunicipal Cable Franchise Transfer Toolkit
Municipal Cable Franchise Transfer Toolkit
 
Update on Wireless Facilities Siting Issues
Update on Wireless Facilities Siting IssuesUpdate on Wireless Facilities Siting Issues
Update on Wireless Facilities Siting Issues
 
Us wireless cable television
Us wireless cable televisionUs wireless cable television
Us wireless cable television
 
Broadcast Regulation
Broadcast RegulationBroadcast Regulation
Broadcast Regulation
 
Radio
RadioRadio
Radio
 
Q&A Telecoms reform in Mexico
Q&A Telecoms reform in Mexico Q&A Telecoms reform in Mexico
Q&A Telecoms reform in Mexico
 
Telecommunications & Broadcasting in Mexico
Telecommunications & Broadcasting in MexicoTelecommunications & Broadcasting in Mexico
Telecommunications & Broadcasting in Mexico
 
Cellular Antennas on Special District Property: The Opportunity and the Risk
Cellular Antennas on Special District Property: The Opportunity and the RiskCellular Antennas on Special District Property: The Opportunity and the Risk
Cellular Antennas on Special District Property: The Opportunity and the Risk
 
Telecom act
Telecom actTelecom act
Telecom act
 
Television
TelevisionTelevision
Television
 
Mega-Mergers and Impacts on Local Government
Mega-Mergers and Impacts on Local GovernmentMega-Mergers and Impacts on Local Government
Mega-Mergers and Impacts on Local Government
 
1 telecom actomanen
1 telecom actomanen1 telecom actomanen
1 telecom actomanen
 
Cable Television Update 2015 – A Look at Federal Regulatory Developments
Cable Television Update 2015 – A Look at Federal Regulatory DevelopmentsCable Television Update 2015 – A Look at Federal Regulatory Developments
Cable Television Update 2015 – A Look at Federal Regulatory Developments
 
Laws & acts relating to the media industry
Laws & acts relating to the media industryLaws & acts relating to the media industry
Laws & acts relating to the media industry
 
Contact Center Compliance April 11 2012 FCC Webinar
Contact Center Compliance April 11 2012 FCC WebinarContact Center Compliance April 11 2012 FCC Webinar
Contact Center Compliance April 11 2012 FCC Webinar
 

Similar to 01 27 11 telecom law

TechComm Industry Update ~ November 2, 2012
TechComm Industry Update ~ November 2, 2012TechComm Industry Update ~ November 2, 2012
TechComm Industry Update ~ November 2, 2012
Patton Boggs LLP
 
TechComm Industry Update - February 26, 2013
TechComm Industry Update - February 26, 2013TechComm Industry Update - February 26, 2013
TechComm Industry Update - February 26, 2013
Patton Boggs LLP
 
2017-01-12 Release - Straight Path CD- Draft_4 clean
2017-01-12 Release - Straight Path CD- Draft_4 clean2017-01-12 Release - Straight Path CD- Draft_4 clean
2017-01-12 Release - Straight Path CD- Draft_4 clean
Andrew Kline
 
Marsden net neutrality in the European Parliament
Marsden net neutrality in the European ParliamentMarsden net neutrality in the European Parliament
Marsden net neutrality in the European Parliament
Chris Marsden
 
Fast DAS FCC Comments Biennial Review(12-5-2016FY)
Fast DAS FCC Comments Biennial Review(12-5-2016FY)Fast DAS FCC Comments Biennial Review(12-5-2016FY)
Fast DAS FCC Comments Biennial Review(12-5-2016FY)
Farzin S Yazdani
 
SRA Denver 2014 - wireless facilities poster
SRA Denver 2014 - wireless facilities posterSRA Denver 2014 - wireless facilities poster
SRA Denver 2014 - wireless facilities poster
Michael Musso
 
TechComm Industry Update - August 17, 2012
TechComm Industry Update - August 17, 2012TechComm Industry Update - August 17, 2012
TechComm Industry Update - August 17, 2012
Patton Boggs LLP
 
Boston conference slides final
Boston conference slides finalBoston conference slides final
Boston conference slides final
Sharpe_Smith
 
Boston conference slides final
Boston conference slides finalBoston conference slides final
Boston conference slides final
Sharpe_Smith
 
TechComm Industry Update - July 20, 2012
TechComm Industry Update - July 20, 2012TechComm Industry Update - July 20, 2012
TechComm Industry Update - July 20, 2012
Patton Boggs LLP
 

Similar to 01 27 11 telecom law (20)

TechComm Industry Update ~ November 2, 2012
TechComm Industry Update ~ November 2, 2012TechComm Industry Update ~ November 2, 2012
TechComm Industry Update ~ November 2, 2012
 
Fcc
FccFcc
Fcc
 
TechComm Industry Update - February 26, 2013
TechComm Industry Update - February 26, 2013TechComm Industry Update - February 26, 2013
TechComm Industry Update - February 26, 2013
 
FCC Proposes New Rules On Local Wireless Siting
FCC Proposes New Rules On Local Wireless SitingFCC Proposes New Rules On Local Wireless Siting
FCC Proposes New Rules On Local Wireless Siting
 
F2C 2012: Mike Marcus
F2C 2012: Mike MarcusF2C 2012: Mike Marcus
F2C 2012: Mike Marcus
 
Tprc2007
Tprc2007Tprc2007
Tprc2007
 
2017-01-12 Release - Straight Path CD- Draft_4 clean
2017-01-12 Release - Straight Path CD- Draft_4 clean2017-01-12 Release - Straight Path CD- Draft_4 clean
2017-01-12 Release - Straight Path CD- Draft_4 clean
 
9.broadcast.public2020
9.broadcast.public20209.broadcast.public2020
9.broadcast.public2020
 
Wireless broadband
Wireless broadband Wireless broadband
Wireless broadband
 
Broadcast and cable regulation
Broadcast and cable regulationBroadcast and cable regulation
Broadcast and cable regulation
 
Marsden net neutrality in the European Parliament
Marsden net neutrality in the European ParliamentMarsden net neutrality in the European Parliament
Marsden net neutrality in the European Parliament
 
Fast DAS FCC Comments Biennial Review(12-5-2016FY)
Fast DAS FCC Comments Biennial Review(12-5-2016FY)Fast DAS FCC Comments Biennial Review(12-5-2016FY)
Fast DAS FCC Comments Biennial Review(12-5-2016FY)
 
2007 Telecom Case Law Update
2007 Telecom Case Law Update2007 Telecom Case Law Update
2007 Telecom Case Law Update
 
NGA legislation in Poland
 NGA legislation in Poland NGA legislation in Poland
NGA legislation in Poland
 
SRA Denver 2014 - wireless facilities poster
SRA Denver 2014 - wireless facilities posterSRA Denver 2014 - wireless facilities poster
SRA Denver 2014 - wireless facilities poster
 
Net Neutrality & Broadband "Reclassification"
Net Neutrality & Broadband "Reclassification"Net Neutrality & Broadband "Reclassification"
Net Neutrality & Broadband "Reclassification"
 
TechComm Industry Update - August 17, 2012
TechComm Industry Update - August 17, 2012TechComm Industry Update - August 17, 2012
TechComm Industry Update - August 17, 2012
 
Boston conference slides final
Boston conference slides finalBoston conference slides final
Boston conference slides final
 
Boston conference slides final
Boston conference slides finalBoston conference slides final
Boston conference slides final
 
TechComm Industry Update - July 20, 2012
TechComm Industry Update - July 20, 2012TechComm Industry Update - July 20, 2012
TechComm Industry Update - July 20, 2012
 

01 27 11 telecom law

  • 1. Telecommunications Law Overview January 27, 2011 – Professor Jack Lerner Guest lecturer: Lisa Borodkin
  • 2. Background - Radio Ship to Ship Radiotelegraphy (37 Stat. 302 1912) Radio Act of 1928
  • 3. Communications Act of 1934 Created FCC 5 Commissioners Appointed by the President One chief
  • 4. Expansion to Television The FTC Act was held to cover television in the 1950s Broadcast Cable Satellite IPTV “known or unknown, hereafter devised”
  • 5. Title III Broadcast regulation To grant licenses to promote “public convenience, interest or necessity.” 47 U.S.C. § 307(2), 309(a) Prescribe the nature of service Assign Frequencies Determine location of stations Prescribe qualifications of station operators No License can be granted to a foreign citizen – (310(a),(b))
  • 6. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. V. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 (1969) First Amendment rights “personal attack” rule 1 week to respond Rationale was dominance of broadcast media and ability to drown out other voices
  • 7. Common Carrier/Enhanced Services Distinction Basic Services – “Plain Old Fashioned Telephone” regulated tariffs Anything else, circa 1980 – “Enhanced” not regulated To be enhanced, can merely be subscriber interaction with stored information – e.g. 976 billing service for adult telephone service Enhanced services were deregulated and approved by the 11th Circuit – 1982 But the 9th Circuit found preemption invalid - 1990
  • 8. MCI v. AT&T, 512 U.S. 218 (1994) Found that the FCC could not use discretion to tailor the Act and apply it to non-dominant exchange carriers like MCI One a service was found to have common carrier status, the full regulation of the Act applied, including tariff regulation
  • 9. Rationale of the 1996 Act Reduce barriers to entry, deregulate and promote competition Added new sections 251 to 261 to Title II Imposed duties on Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (“ILEC”) Duty to interconnect Duty to resell on nondiscriminatory basis Duty to share networks
  • 10. Title II of the 1996 Act 8 year limit on broadcast license (shortened from 15) Section 203 Allows for reconsideration of incumbent without considering competing applications (Sec. 204) Lapse if broadcaster fails to transmit for 1 year
  • 11. Unbundling necessary network elements requirement Network elements are the physical wire loop from the telephone exchange to the customer’s premises Think about competition for long distance services
  • 12. FCC’s Power - to Revoke License False statements Failed to operate within license Failed to provide access to political candidates Used license to distribute controlled substance
  • 13. Satellite – Section 205 Jurisdiction over direct-to-home satellite Criminalizes interception and decryption of direct to home satellite broadcast
  • 14. V-Chip technology -1988 Requires tvs greater than 13” to have V-chip technology to allow parents to block out violent, sexual or other programming
  • 15. Trends – Deregulation because scarcity less of an issue Light regulation of IP-based services Packet-switching technology replacing circuit switched Reno v. ACLU, 521 U.S. 844 (1997) Refused to apply Red Lion to the Internet Because it was not characterized by scarcity Struck down part of the Communications Decency Act as unconstitutional (Section 230)
  • 16. Network self-governance ICAAN – Network solutions Dispute resolution over domain names TLD Registrars Enforcement Issues Conflict of laws - .ly COICA – U.S. Customs
  • 17. Private Rights of Action Violation of 47 U.S.C. Section 605 Violation of 47 U.S.C. Section 553
  • 18. IPTV Issues Google TV Apple TV Content Providers under no obligation to provide content Hulu Fox withholding content from IPTV

Editor's Notes

  1. Rationale: Allocation of scarce spectrumElectronic Media Regulation History• Wireless Ship Act of 1910• Radio Act of 1912, prompted by Titanic disaster• Radio Act of 1927, establishing the Federal Radio Commission
  2. • Communications Act of 1934, establishing the Federal Communications CommissionFederal Communications Commission• Commissioners–5 commissioners, 5-year terms–President appoints, U.S. Senate confirms–No more than 3 commissioners from same political partyFederal Communications Commission•
  3. Regulates technologies using the electromagnetic spectrum– e.g., radio, TV, cable, satellite•Regulates wireline and wireless long-distance phone companiesBroadcast Regulation•Spectrum scarcity•Broadcast media are pervasive•Radio, TV impact on audiences, particularly childrenPolitical Broadcasting• Section 315 of Communications Act of 1934–When one legally qualified candidate for an elective office uses a radio or TV station or cable system–Any other legally qualified candidate for the same office may ask for equal opportunity to use the station or system• Equal opportunity is chance to reach approximately same type and size of audience as opponent hadPolitical Broadcasting• Legally qualified candidate–Legally qualified to hold office, and–Publicly announced as candidate, or active write-in candidatePolitical Broadcasting•Using a broadcast station or cable system–The candidate, the candidate’s picture or the candidate’s voice being seen or heard–Candidate need not discuss politicsPolitical Broadcasting•Exceptions to the use rule–Regularly scheduled newscast–Regularly scheduled news interview program–Coverage of bona fide news event, including candidate debates–News documentaryPolitical Broadcasting• Candidate must ask for equal opportunity• Station or system must keep publicly-available records of political uses Political Broadcasting• Politicians must be charged lowest unit rate–Lowest advertising rate station or system charges–During period 60 days before general elections and 45 days before primary elections• Outside the 60-day and 45-day periods, politicians must be charged rates comparable to any other advertiserPolitical Broadcasting•Stations and systems cannot censor or edit political advertisementsPolitical Broadcasting•Section 312(a)(7) of the Communications Act of 1934•Broadcast stations must provide reasonable access to candidates for federal officesChildren’s Programming• Commercial TV stations must provide programming for children meeting their intellectual and social/emotional needs–3 hours per week–At least 30-minute long programs–Programs scheduled weekly–Programs broadcast between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m.Broadcast Licensing• Must have FCC license to broadcast on radio or TV• Must meet certain criteria to obtain licenseCable TV Regulation• Cable’s First Amendment rights–Content-based regulations are tested under strict-scrutiny analysis–Content-neutral regulations are tested under intermediate-scrutiny analysisCable TV Regulation• Cable Franchising–Franchise is required to provide cable service–Franchise is granted by franchising authority• Franchising authority usually is the city government where cable service will be providedCable TV Regulation• Cable programming–Cable systems carry broadcast TV stations through• Must-carry, or• Retransmission consentCable TV Regulation• Cable programming: Most cable systems provide–Public, educational or governmental (PEG) channels–Commercial leased access channelsInternet Regulation•The First Amendment protects Internet content as completely as it does print media content
  4. Circuit split can be resolved by the Supreme Court or Amending the Statute