View stunning SlideShares in full-screen with the new iOS app!Introducing SlideShare for AndroidExplore all your favorite topics in the SlideShare appGet the SlideShare app to Save for Later — even offline
View stunning SlideShares in full-screen with the new Android app!View stunning SlideShares in full-screen with the new iOS app!
‘ illuminating irony of our time’ that ‘at the same time as American conservatives find same-sex marriage an intolerable threat, queer radicals apparently see same-sex marriage as not enough of a threat, and an unacceptable surrender to heteronormativity’
‘ we must not imagine a world of discourse divided between accepted discourse and excluded discourse, or between the dominant discourse and the dominated one; but as a multiplicity of discourse elements that can come into play in various strategies…We must make allowance for the complex and unstable process whereby discourse can be both an instrument and an effect of power, but also a hindrance, a stumbling block, a point of resistance and a starting point for an opposing strategy. ’
Ashford: ‘ So it is with the emergence of the (homo)normative. It occupies a space outside the accepted and excluded. In considering civil partnerships, same-sex marriage and other aspects of the (homo)normative legal discourse, as with those activities excluded such as public sex and barebacking, we must look, as Foucault suggested, at who is speaking, their position of power and the institutional context in which they happen to be situated. ’