Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
PHILOSOPHY DEBATE Laura Sortwell & Chris Trahos
<ul><li>Proof of an External World </li></ul>G.E. Moore
Hands Example
Proof – 3 Conditions <ul><li>Premise is different from the conclusion </li></ul><ul><li>I certainly know the premise </li>...
Misprints Example <ul><li>Laura and Chris are giiving a presentation today debating the arguments of Bertrand Russell and ...
Proof for the Past
Objections
<ul><li>“ In all affairs it's a healthy thing now and then to hang a question mark on the things you have long taken for g...
Sense-data <ul><li>We do not perceive physical objects directly, but instead only perceive their sense-data </li></ul><ul>...
Table Example
Table Cloth Example
Proof <ul><li>If P is an instinctive belief, </li></ul><ul><li>P provides the best explanation of S’s evidence </li></ul><...
Objections
<ul><li>Please split up into 2 teams </li></ul>Class Discussion
2 Proofs <ul><li>Premise is different from the conclusion </li></ul><ul><li>I certainly know the premise </li></ul><ul><li...
The End
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Philosophy Debate Powerpoint

1,749

Published on

A powerpoint I made for my Philosophy & Star Trek Class for a debate between the principles of Moore and Russel over whether there is an external world or not. Simple ppt for the presentation but it was effective.

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,749
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
21
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Philosophy Debate Powerpoint"

  1. 1. PHILOSOPHY DEBATE Laura Sortwell & Chris Trahos
  2. 2. <ul><li>Proof of an External World </li></ul>G.E. Moore
  3. 3. Hands Example
  4. 4. Proof – 3 Conditions <ul><li>Premise is different from the conclusion </li></ul><ul><li>I certainly know the premise </li></ul><ul><li>The conclusion follows </li></ul>
  5. 5. Misprints Example <ul><li>Laura and Chris are giiving a presentation today debating the arguments of Bertrand Russell and G.E. Moore. </li></ul><ul><li>Following their opening statements, they will be providng objections. Thewy will follow up each objection with an appropriate response. </li></ul>
  6. 6. Proof for the Past
  7. 7. Objections
  8. 8. <ul><li>“ In all affairs it's a healthy thing now and then to hang a question mark on the things you have long taken for granted.” </li></ul><ul><li>- Bertrand Russell </li></ul>Bertrand Russell
  9. 9. Sense-data <ul><li>We do not perceive physical objects directly, but instead only perceive their sense-data </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Sense-data are the things that are immediately known in sensation such as color, touch, smell, etc </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. Table Example
  11. 11. Table Cloth Example
  12. 12. Proof <ul><li>If P is an instinctive belief, </li></ul><ul><li>P provides the best explanation of S’s evidence </li></ul><ul><li>Then S is justified in believing that P </li></ul>
  13. 13. Objections
  14. 14. <ul><li>Please split up into 2 teams </li></ul>Class Discussion
  15. 15. 2 Proofs <ul><li>Premise is different from the conclusion </li></ul><ul><li>I certainly know the premise </li></ul><ul><li>The conclusion follows </li></ul><ul><li>If P is an instinctive belief, </li></ul><ul><li>P provides the best explanation of S’s evidence </li></ul><ul><li>Then S is justified in believing that P </li></ul><ul><li>Moore’s </li></ul><ul><li>Russell’s </li></ul>
  16. 16. The End
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×