Content Based Language Learning: Revisited? Reconceptualised? - Presentation Transcript
Content-based teaching: Again? Revisited? Remembered? Reconceptualised? Lindy Norris Murdoch University
Structure of the paper
Why have we ‘gone cold and quiet’ on this topic here in Australia in the last decade?
Why should we now give content-based teaching consideration?
How might it be reconceptualised?
What might it look like, particularly with respect to Indonesian?
In content-based classrooms, students are exposed to a considerable amount of language while learning content. This incidental language should be comprehensible, linked to their immediate prior learning, and relevant to their needs – all important criteria for successful language learning. Such a setting for learning makes second language learning consistent with most other academic learning contexts as well; that is most classrooms involve the teaching of some type of content information, and, in those classes, language learning also occurs – at least incidentally .
Snow and Brinton 1997, pp.19-20 (my emphasis)
Infrastructure issues
Establishment and maintenance costs
Learning and teaching resources
Continuity
We went from minimal English in immersion classes to minimal Indonesian in Indonesian classes.
Norris 1999, p.159
Teacher provision
Pedagogical issues
Teacher knowledge
proficiency V content knowledge
Methodological approach
‘ submersion’ V ‘immersion’
Limited focus on oral production
Limited focus on form
Limited focus on ‘culture’
Policy issues
National focus on the expansion of the number of programs (NALSAS) rather than necessarily strengthening existing programs.
And in spite of the above, the valuing of languages was not comparable to French in Canada or English in Europe.
What’s changed?
Language and learning
Focus on form
Sociocultural and constructivist views on language learning
What’s changed?
Language policy
NALSSP aims to:
Increase the number of Asian language classes offered in schools.
Increase the number of qualified Asian language teachers.
Develop a specialist curriculum for advanced language students.
Have12% of students exit Year 12 with a fluency by 2020.
How might it be reconceptalised?
Need to take account of previous experiences and shortcomings
Need to be aware of situation-specificity of language use
BICS and CALP
L2 as literacy
Genre
What else?
Janji College
Defining ‘content’ at Janji College:
Learner phase of development
School organisational structure
Conceptual orientations and emphases, particularly;
Literacy
Multiliteracies
Investigation
Interculturality
Resources
How these factors intersect will determine content and orientation of the program. Program orientation will not be static but will shift to support the different emphases associated with different phases of schooling and the diversity within the school community. A consequence of this will be that the ‘content’ of the Indonesian program will be experienced very differently by learners depending on who they are and what they bring to the program. Shifting emphases also have significant implications for the staffing and resourcing of the program.
K-1
Indonesian will be the medium of instruction for regular play-based learning experiences.
There will be no explicit attention to the language in terms of literacy.
2-4
Comparisons of the features of L1 with Indonesian to enhance understanding of the structure and workings of language.
Gradual expansion of the knowledge and use of language conventions.
Some designated content from other curriculum areas to be taught / reinforced in Indonesian.
In terms of interculturality there will be explicit attention to noticing similarities and differences through curriculum (big books, Indonesian narratives, S and E content).
5-7
Increasing explicit emphasis on language as social practice rather than language as code.
Increasing use of ICT to enhance and grow understandings associated with hybridity in both L1 and L2 texts.
Opportunities provided for the challenging of stereotypes and for ‘borderline experiences’ with some of the markedly different conceptualisations of Indonesian culture. (Witte 2006)
Indonesian language and culture reflected through, and used in ‘big idea’ integrated investigative projects.
8-9
Curriculum planning and implementation to include significant intersections between TL and other content areas ( History and Politics with Indonesian texts in English and in Media).
Emphasis on learners developing a growing appreciation of the foreign culture and language, together with a developing capacity to reflect on own culture and language.
Learners will increasingly appreciate how social practices are fundamentally connected to, and interwoven with, language use and literacy practices.
Emphasis on synchronous and asynchronous real TL communication with ICTs.
10-12
In-country experience
Other learning experiences as per state post-compulsory curriculum requirements
‘ adjustments’ through specialised NALSSP curriculum
The proposed program configuration, with its different intersections and interpretations of context, content and language has the potential to deliver on NALSSP objectives, particularly with respect to year 12 exit proficiency.
It also has the capacity to enhance the status and appreciation of languages in general and Indonesian in particular. Given the current state of affairs with respect to the study of Indonesian in Australian schools, we could do with some good news.
0 comments
Post a comment