Qti Update Jan 2009

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Qti Update Jan 2009 - Presentation Transcript

    1. QTI: where are we and where are we going? Pierre Gorissen - SURFfoundation Steve Lay - Questionmark
    2. QTI timeline
      • Conceived in 1999, v1.0 released in 2000
      • Updated in 2001 (v1.1) and 2002 (v1.2) to improve and extend the model
      • By 2003 it was clear that a major revision was necessary, a quick fix (1.2.1) was followed by a complete rewrite
      • QTI v2.0 was published February 2005
      • QTI v2.1 (PD2) published June 2006
      • QTI v2.1 (PD2) – addendum published March 2008
      • QTI v2.1 (Final) expected ??
    3. QTI 2.1 Status
      • Collected comments on Public Draft
        • Released errata document
      • Profiling discussion
        • Still ongoing, some work done on CC K12 profile
      • Interoperability demonstration
        • Has not taken place yet
      • Because of that – no date set for final release
    4. Project team
      • Meeting on monthly basis until December 2008
      • As of January 2009
        • Co-chair Steve Lay stepped down
        • Co-chair Pierre Gorissen stepped down
      • IMS are looking for a new chair, issues should be raised directly with:
        • Kevin Riley, IMS
        • Lisa Mattson, IMS Operations
    5. Changes in most recent update
      • Esoteric backwards-compatible changes:
        • Outcomes can also be substituted in Maths and Objects (not just template variables); minor schema change
        • Minor changes to rules of substitution in MathML to support operator and variable name parameterization; no schema change
        • Deprecation of special duration-based operators; no schema change
        • Recommendation to allow extensions at ‘rule’ level within processing elements; more permissive schema extensions
        • Other wording changes to provide clarity with no intended changes to meaning or schema
      • These are only recommendations from this community – they are not agreed changes!
    6. Questions…
    7. Thank you for your attention…

    + University of StrathclydeUniversity of Strathclyde, 11 months ago

    custom

    186 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Steve Lay of Questionmark and Pierre Gorissen of SU more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 186
      • 186 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Tags