Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
La plaza cultural reporter's book
La plaza cultural reporter's book
La plaza cultural reporter's book
La plaza cultural reporter's book
La plaza cultural reporter's book
La plaza cultural reporter's book
La plaza cultural reporter's book
La plaza cultural reporter's book
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

La plaza cultural reporter's book

649

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
649
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  1. Reporters’ book La Plaza Cultural Armando Perez Hyemi Lee, Gyujin Jung, Nahee Choi, Nozomi Akioka
  2. Part 1: Interview
  3. 1.1 Description What do they do? (Description of service idea, e.g. a community garden, a food coop, etc). What are the demands/problems this initiative responds to? What is the aim of the initiative? What happens and how does it happens? What benefits does it bring to the neighborhood? “La plaza Cultural” is a non-profit organization that is widely open to the public, and mostly served on volunteer basis. The owners of this garden, i.e. the executive director and her husband are professionals in theater skills and when they discovered this garden they decided to renovate it to an open theatre. In their view, the garden can be used for several kinds of events such as rental space for magazine’s photo shooting, holding birthday parties, wedding ceremonies, family gatherings as well as meetings. They charge a certain amount of fee for people to use the premises. According to the owners, this forms the largest source of their income and it has a membership of 150-200 official members. There are also several committees who are charged with different roles in the garden: parents committee, landscape committee, Website committee, event committee. The most unique thing about the garden is that it has plenty of space so parents always bring their children to play and engage in other activities with other children thus offering them a great experience. 1.2 Context What is this neighborhood like? How was it before this new solution took place? 12 years ago before community garden was created, people of working class used to live at Alphabet Avenue but it was an insecure place to reside. A lot of land was on waste and there were no restaurants, bars, or major high rises and many drug peddlers were on the streets. The population mostly consisted of people of Spanish origin. After the development of the community garden, there were great changes and advancements on Alphabet Avenue. New people moved in while others visited, the neighborhood became trendy as people opened new businesses such as restaurants and bars and also residential and rental houses for those who came to visit the garden. The crime rate went down and security was improved thus encouraging more people to visit the area.
  4. 1.3 History of the initiative How did the project/initiative start? Who took the initiative? Why? Can you describe a timeline of events, highlighting success and failure aspects, major milestones? How far can you go back? How did this initiative mature? How did it turn to be a real enterprise? (registered, formalized etc.) Did it receive public or private support of any kind? Did it help change the public or policy structure? Formation of La Plaza Cultural in 1976 was through a joint effort of the local residents and greening activists. A city that was sparsely occupied and with piles of waste and rubble was the initial picture of the area before renovation. With the determination to secure the area from the filthy look and encroachment of vices, members of the Latino group CHARAS who were the initial founders of the La Plaza Cultural, joined efforts to refurbish the area. Buckminster Fuller, a very famous architect helped in building an arena and show casting of events began. Liz Christy was a great activist of the community garden and she helped in planting of trees. Liz Christy who was a pioneer helped in planting of the turf and linden trees. More so it has a lot of political history. One time the garden was almost snatched by some people who wanted to erect buildings on that area. After numerous court battles, La Plaza was finally secured. Currently, La plaza Cultural is really successful. Many of these volunteers visit the place without having to pay much thus making out a great success story. 1.4 Main actors Who are the users of this initiative? Who are the promoters of this initiative? Is there a difference between users and promoters or are they basically the same? Describe users and promoters lifestyles? Do the users work as a group or groups? Is there a network of related organizations and/or individuals? Do they have any form of connection or exchange with other similar initiatives? Was the group inspired by other examples? Do you know counter examples, (of service ideas that did not take-off), cases that went wrong? We interviewed the executive director of the garden, Sheila. She works as a volunteer in the garden. Basically, her work is to oversee that all the different committees in the garden perform their duties. They have four different kinds of committee which are the compost committee, parents committee, landscape committee and event committee. The compost committee works to maintain the garden and food waste compost system made up of the metal cans, 3 bins system, and compost tumbler. The Parents Committee works to enhance children’s use of La Plaza. Sometimes they have children learning classes and seasonal parties. Landscape committee is responsible for the landscaping of the garden. The performance and events committee oversees and prepares the venue for the events that take place in the garden such as birthday parties, BBQs, weddings, theater & music events. Most of the members are residents around that area and they visit the place often to plant vegetables.
  5. 1.5. Technologies What are the technologies that the group uses? How are they used in system? The group uses a compost system. They have a compost committee that is in charge of managing the compost in the garden. Fortunately, we met a member of the compost committee. He told us that the committee consists of 7 members. The members are responsible for mixing food waste, putting it into the composting bins, and maintaining the cleanliness of the composting area. They work Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and weekends. There are no assigned work shifts so that whoever has time comes and does the job. Moreover, they let people even from outside of the community bring food scraps from home. For the future, they plan to build a rainwater gathering system. 1.6. Communication What communication materials do the group have? (e.g. website, brochures, postcards, etc). What is the main purpose of these materials? e.g. to keep participants updated about activities (internal communication) or to get more participants (external communication)? Does the group want to have more participants? They use a website to inform the general public of the garden's mission, how to become a member and get involved in committees, and what activities happen there every month. Also, through the website, people who are interested in booking the space for an event can contact the executive director of the community garden to make a reservation. The community garden would like to have more participants.
  6. 1.7. Perspective for the future What are the perspective/objectives of the group for the next 3-5 years? What are some of the success factors and possible risks in the short medium and long term? La Plaza Garden is divided into several communities catering to the New York City’s general public as a landscape community. It is based on the concept of green garden recycling. The surrounding community is preparing to further develop the vicinity within the next several years. Several buildings and large trees shade the park blocking sunlight. The park’s first initiative is to remove and trim these trees allowing the park to harbor more sun, space and a potential rain water system. With the lack of volunteers to maintain the garden the construction of a rain water system to irrigate water flow would shift the dependency on manual labor allowing the garden to run self-sufficiently. To create an easier environment for parents and children to interact safely, the parents committee intends to renovate the sandbox as well as construct long benches along the garden’s sandbox that allows storage space for toys. The construction of the benches will align the park for the parents to easily supervise their children as they play.   1.8. Problems and opportunities Are there any specific issues/problems/barriers that pose threats to the initiative? Are there any main areas of concern among the participants (leaders and users alike)? Are there any opportunities that could be explored (that are currently not explored)? There are several issues surrounding the construction of the garden and its initiative. The existence of the garden is not 100% assured with the inauguration of New York City’s next mayor and the choice to further the development of public city parks. The maintenance schedule itself as well is unreliable because of the gardens dependency on city volunteers. The responsibility to keep the garden safe and clean relies on a collective effort and with lack of proper leadership attracting voluntary community participation will be difficult. Noise pollution as well serves as a conflicting issue as the Chief Executive Officer of the garden voiced concern in the surrounding neighborhood’s sensitivity to noise. To solve this current predicament, a suggestion of installing a sound proof enclosure has been made. Space also threatens a current park amenity of a private gardening plot. There is a large wait list to obtain these plots hindering the opportunity for private gardening. .
  7. 1.9. Indications of other social innovation Do the users participate in other entrepreneurial endeavors? Do they form small initiatives on their own? Are members involved in other “sustainable” services within the community? (Ex. Food Co-op, carpooling, community gardens, etc)? Do you see evidence of wider networks that these users contribute to? The original construction of the garden was not intentionally to create a community space, but an open area for theatrical use. Fortunately, initiatives to further promote the garden and its foundation of green recycle gardening have been made by independently creating compost piles for gardening of their private plots. Other endeavors were not discussed within the interview.   1.10. References Website of the initiative Interviewee name and contact information (email, address, phone number) Other references (websites, articles, other people we should talk to) Executive director: Sheila Garson Garden Address: 9th Street and Avenue C Email: laplazaevents@yahoo.com
  8. Quantitative Data Exercise How many members does the initiative have? How many are very active in the initiative? How does individual spaces compare with shared/group spaces? How many members are involved in other community-based services? (Food Co-op, activist orgs, clothes swapping, bike sharing, etc.) What is the size of the initiative in square footage? CEO of the garden is handling events and each different committee is in charge of doing their work: parents committee, landscape committee, compost committee, website committee, event committee. 150-200 members are involved in the garden and it is run by 7 gardeners.  

×