School Library 2.0

2,119 views
2,031 views

Published on

IASL 2009 38th Annual Conference
Abano Terme (Padua), Italy, 2 - 4 September 2009

Published in: Education
1 Comment
7 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total views
2,119
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
157
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
1
Likes
7
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Aprendizagem individual e autónoma fora da sala de aula
  • Se os alunos podem aprender em qualquer lado, com ferramentas e recursos que não estão exclusivamente disponíveis na escola, porque precisamos de uma biblioteca escolar?
  • Procura constantemente a inovação e acompanha as mudanças que ocorrem na comunidade, adaptando os seus serviços para permitir aos utilizadores procurar, encontrar e utilizar a informação
  • Web 2.0 provides tools to «get inside the heads of people who are using these new environments for social interaction» (Kukulska-Hulme, 2006)
  • A partir de 2005, começaram a surgir os primeiros estudos internacionais sobre Web 2.0 envolvendo bibliotecas, bibliotecários e ferramentas tecnológicas, originando o conceito de Biblioteca 2.0. O termo Biblioteca 2.0 (Library 2.0) foi concebido por Michael Casey no seu blogue LibrayCrunch ( http:// www.librarycrunch.com ) em 2005.
  • A tag is a keyword that is added to a digital object (e.g. a website, picture or video clip) to describe it, but not as part of a formal classification system. Tagging is also known as social classification or social indexing. When an item has a tag added to it, the tag becomes a clickable link to more items associated with that tag. Users can create tag clouds that reveal the most popular tags: tags with higher frequency of use are displayed in larger text.
  • Tagging is also known as democratic indexing: Every single item includes descriptive cataloguing and subject indexing based on user perceptions of the item; the ability of individual users to record their private indexes, offering a democratic approach to indexing. Democratic indexing is a challenge how to involve users in creating metadata. Metadata created by professionals have high quality but are expensive. User-created metadata are an alternative tagging is essentially Web 2.0 because it allows users to add and change not only content (data), but content describing content (metadata). In Library 2.0, users could tag the library's collection and thereby participate in the cataloging process.
  • Technolust" -- a insatiable need to acquire the latest, fastest, most exotic computer gadgets, whether teachers and students need them or want them.
  • Interage com os utilizadores quer de forma síncrona (por ex. IM – mensagens instantâneas) quer de forma assíncrona (por ex. wikis).
  • School Library 2.0

    1. 1. Carlos Pinheiro, Fevereiro de 2009 School Library 2.0 IASL 2009 38th Annual Conference Abano Terme (Padua), Italy, 2 - 4 September 2009 Carlos Pinheiro, Portugal
    2. 2. New Wa ys of lear ning
    3. 3. <ul><li>Different media lead to… </li></ul><ul><li>… different skills </li></ul>
    4. 5. Multi-Tasking Listening to favorite music Doing homework Calling a friend Surfing the web and using MSN
    5. 6. Why do we School libraries? need still
    6. 7. innovative user-centered dynamic School library
    7. 8. Web 2.0 Web 2.0 provides tools to «get inside the heads of people who are using these new environments for social interaction» (Kukulska-Hulme, 2006)
    8. 9. Web 2.0+Library = Library 2.0
    9. 10. For books Web 2.0 tools for libraries Social cataloging
    10. 11. For music Web 2.0 tools for libraries Social cataloging Rate Your Music
    11. 12. For movies Web 2.0 tools for libraries Social cataloging
    12. 13. For academic publications Web 2.0 tools for libraries Social cataloging
    13. 14. For computer and video games Web 2.0 tools for libraries Social cataloging
    14. 15. Social OPAC* exlibrisgroup.com encoreforlibraries.com *Online Public Access Catalog Web 2.0 tools for libraries
    15. 16. Communicate blogger.com wordpress.com wikispaces.com Web 2.0 tools for libraries
    16. 17. Organize bloglines.com diigo.com Web 2.0 tools for libraries
    17. 18. Share slideshare.net Web 2.0 tools for libraries
    18. 19. Rating fresqui.com digg.com Web 2.0 tools for libraries
    19. 20. Social Networks hi5.com Web 2.0 tools for libraries
    20. 21. <ul><li>Free </li></ul><ul><li>Easy to use, easy to stay updated </li></ul><ul><li>Complement of library web page </li></ul>Blogs
    21. 22. <ul><li>We use it for: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Support for curriculum, literacy and reading. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Encourage students to write. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Provide resources to students and teachers. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Provide news and announcements. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Present collections of links for specific topics. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Supply lists of new acquisitions, reading lists and book reviews. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Facilitate access to podcasts, slideshows and videos. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Platform of social bookmarking. </li></ul></ul>Blogs
    22. 23. <ul><li>http:// lerparacrer.wordpress.com </li></ul>Blogs
    23. 24. <ul><li>Can be used to teach citizenship in the online world being a starting point for discussions about web research, copyright, illegal downloads… </li></ul><ul><li>We also provide resources on information literacy, advertise library collections and services, share pictures/music/videos/virtual exhibitions and we use commenting feature to ask students to suggest books and videos for the collection. </li></ul>Social network sites
    24. 25. <ul><li>RSS feeds provide libraries a way to syndicate and republish content on the Web. </li></ul><ul><li>Can be used to republish content from other sites or blogs on the library sites or blogs, or to delivery information to the users, new items in a collection, new services, and new content. </li></ul>RSS Feeds
    25. 26. <ul><li>Allows real-time interaction through a computer using text. </li></ul><ul><li>Why to use Instant Messaging (IM) in the SL? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Students love it (MSN is the most popular tool in the school computers); </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>It's free! </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Easy to use. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Students may access the library remotely (in our school students use it as an online helpdesk). </li></ul></ul>Instant messaging
    26. 27. <ul><li>Easy to use. </li></ul><ul><li>Anyone can make changes. </li></ul><ul><li>Free and open source. </li></ul><ul><li>Very useful for group working. </li></ul><ul><li>We use wikis for many different purposes: library and information skills tutorials, reading lists, book reviews… </li></ul><ul><li>http://netescola.wikispaces.com </li></ul>Wikis
    27. 28. Tagging and social bookmarking
    28. 29. Tagging and social bookmarking The act of tagging is done by the person consuming the information. ' VanderWal, 2005, blog entry.
    29. 30. Tagging and social bookmarking http://www.diigo.com/user/biblionet
    30. 31. Social cataloging
    31. 32. Social cataloging
    32. 33. Social cataloging
    33. 34. Getting started <ul><li>You must have a plan! </li></ul><ul><li>How will this improve library services? Will pupils use it? </li></ul><ul><li>Focus on the functionality, not the tool. </li></ul><ul><li>Don’t do it alone: Involve library staff and ICT teachers and even pupils. </li></ul><ul><li>Enjoy it. Web 2.0 is fun! </li></ul><ul><li>Offer trainings for staff and pupils. </li></ul><ul><li>Be prepared to make mistakes. </li></ul>
    34. 35. <ul><li>Library 2.0 is not just about technology. We must remember that while technology can be a tool to better serve our users, it is not the final answer to all of our problems. (M. Casey) </li></ul>
    35. 36. It is not a new technology, but a new attitude
    36. 37. Library 2.0 it's all of us
    37. 38. Thank you [email_address]

    ×