Sheriff Joe Arpaio Set To Unleash “Shocking” Obama Birth Certificate Revelations
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Sheriff Joe Arpaio Set To Unleash “Shocking” Obama Birth Certificate Revelations



“Breathtaking” information will top previous...

“Breathtaking” information will top previous
press conference, says lead investigator
Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse are
set to unleash “shocking” revelations about
Barack Obama’s birth certificate at a press
conference later this month, information
described as “breathtaking” by lead investigator
Mike Zullo.



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Sheriff Joe Arpaio Set To Unleash “Shocking” Obama Birth Certificate Revelations Sheriff Joe Arpaio Set To Unleash “Shocking” Obama Birth Certificate Revelations Document Transcript

  • Sheriff Joe Arpaio Set To Unleash“Shocking” Obama Birth CertificateRevelationsPaul Joseph WatsonInfowars.comMonday, July 2, 2012“Breathtaking” information will top previouspress conference, says lead investigatorSheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse areset to unleash “shocking” revelations aboutBarack Obama’s birth certificate at a pressconference later this month, informationdescribed as “breathtaking” by lead investigatorMike Zullo.BREAKING! Sheriff Joe Promises a JULY17th SCORCHER ON Obamas EligibilityVideo below with Tea Party Power Hour host MarkGillar, Zullo said that the upcoming press conference would go above and beyond the March 1st eventduring which Arpaio and his team announced they would investigate the probability that Obama’s longform birth certificate, released by the White House in April 2011, was a forgery. “I can’t disclose to youwhat we’ve discovered, but it’s going to be a shocking revelation at our press conference,” said Zullo.Arpaio and his posse are set to present evidence gathered during their recent trip to Hawaii, includingthe fact that stamps bearing Registrar Alvin Onaka’s name, used to verify Obama’s birth in Honolulu,are “floating around” inside the Hawaii Department of Health. The upcoming press conference is set tobe held on July 17 at 2:30 p.m. local time at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office in Phoenix, Ariz.,with World Net Daily again providing live streaming video coverage. “From what you’re telling me,”Gillar said, “it sounds like the next press conference is going to be even more amazing than the lastpress conference back on March 1st.”“It will be,” Zullo responded. “The information … is going to be breathtaking when it’s released.”As we have exhaustively documented, Obama’s long form birth certificate contains so many errors itlooks it was cobbled together by a teenager using rudimentary software. Sheriff Arpaio has beentargeted by the Obama administration over his stance surrounding the Arizona illegal immigrationissue, a process many suspect is also tied to Arpaio’s efforts to vet Obama’s birth certificate.During a recent appearance on Fox News, Arpaio promised to maintain his position despite a recentSupreme Court’s decision to strike down parts of the law which requires suspected illegal immigrantsto prove they are in the country legally.Back in May, the Justice Department announced it was suing Arpaio over alleged civil rights violationson behalf of the Maricopa County sheriff’s office.
  • Supreme Court Helps Obama Fulfill Dreamsfrom His Communist MentorPaul Kengoramericanthinker.comJuly 2, 2012As readers of this site are aware,thanks especially to Jack Cashillsrecent posts, Ive been researchingand writing a book on BarackObamas mentor, Frank MarshallDavis. That book, titled TheCommunist: Frank Marshall Davis,The Untold Story of BarackObamas Mentor, just came off thepress this week, with an officialrelease date of July 17. I knew thatthe book would be very relevant,and weve been preparing formedia reaction. In the book, I listat length the stunning commonalities in Daviss thinking and communist propaganda work andPresident Obamas thinking and work. That said, I didnt imagine how relevant it would be inlight of the Supreme Courts decision on ObamaCare. Let me explain.Frank Marshall Davis, who lived from 1905 to 1987, mentored Barack Obama in Hawaii in the 1970s.Davis was a devoted communist -- pro-Soviet, pro-Stalin, and pro-Mao. His Communist Party numberwas 47544. Davis did terrible, blatant propaganda work for the international communist movement. InThe Communist, I publish rare declassified FBI and Soviet archival documents on Davis and his work.I also present columns written by Davis for Communist Party newspapers in the 1940s and 1950s.(Click here for video.)Among those columns, Frank Marshall Davis wrote a piece on July 21, 1955 calling for taxpayerfunding of universal health care. That column was published in the Honolulu Record, which was theCommunist Party publication for Hawaii. As Davis put it, he wanted to "see my tax dollars go to insure health care for everybody." I first read that column over a year ago. Given Daviss linking of "tax" dollars to universal health care, and Chief Justice John Roberts and the Supreme Court doing the same in their historic decision, that column suddenly has new meaning (and irony) for me.
  • In fact, Daviss belief in government-controlled health carewent even farther. Prior to his work writing communistpropaganda for the Honolulu Record, Frank Marshall Davishad been a columnist and founding editor-in-chief for theChicago Star (1946-48). The Star was the Communist Partypublication for Chicago -- known among locals as the "RedStar." There, Daviss fellow columnists included SenatorClaude "Red" Pepper of Florida, who championed a 1947 billto socialize medicine in the United States. That bill, whichfailed, was written by Peppers chief of staff, Charles Kramer.Who was Charles Kramer? Kramer was born CharlesKrivitsky. He had been a self-proclaimed "progressive" whopreviously worked for FDRs Agricultural AdjustmentAdministration. In fact, we now know that Kramer wasworking for the KGB. He was an official Soviet agent, withthe KGB codename "Mole." He was so bad, so suspicious,that J. Edgar Hoover himself personally wrote a letter directlyto President Truman warning about Kramer.Such were the kind of characters that Obamas mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, worked with to advancea government takeover of health care in the 1940s. They called themselves "progressives," but in truth,they were hardcore communists trying to advance Marxism, with a government takeover of health careas a crucial step.And yet, theres more to the story.Another irony of Frank Marshall Davis, in light of Obamas and the courts actions on health care, washis bold willingness to declare certain policies "constitutional" even when they clearly were not. Daviswas never shy about that. In a June 1949 column, to cite just one example, he stated unequivocally,"That, it seems to me, is unconstitutional."Well, lets bring this, too, up to date.Thanks to the current actions of the Supreme Court, which declared Obamas health care bid"constitutional," Frank Marshall Davis is no doubt smiling from his grave. Alas, the old CommunistParty cronys pupil, Barack Obama, has at long last fulfilled the dreams of Frank Marshall Davis:government-controlled "universal health care," sanctified by the Supreme Court as "constitutional," anddeclared a "tax."Its eerie, chilling, but true. In his wildest dreams, Justice John Roberts couldnt imagine that he hasfulfilled the ambitions not only of Barack Obama, but of Frank Marshall Davis and Communist PartyUSA.Hows that for hope and change? Amazing, truly amazing.Dreams from My Real Father: A Story of Obamas Real Father Frank Marshall DavisVideo below
  • Obama Wants You on Food StampsMelissa MeltonInfowars.comJune 30, 2012If the Supreme Court upholding Obamacare leftAmericans with any doubts we are officially living in adebt-fueled social welfare state, the ObamaAdministration recently spent three million dollars toconvince us we will all live healthier lives if we sign upfor food stamps.The U.S. Department of Agriculture has been running aSupplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)propaganda campaign for several months now. Primarilyaimed at Hispanics, the elderly, and the working poor andunemployed, ads include radio segments claiming thatfood stamps help beneficiaries “eat right”: Woman #1: “I wonder how she stays so fit, what’s her secret?” Woman #2: “Well she told me that food stamp benefits help her eat right, and she stays active too.”(The full commercials may be heard here.)Food stamp guidelines only require that items purchased with stamps are designated as “food for homeconsumption”. It should be noted the USDA does not station enforcement officers at grocery stores toensure food stamp recipients’ shopping carts are filled with vegetables instead of potato chips.Reality apparently aside, food stamp use has skyrocketed 100 percent in President Obama’s America,no doubt due in part to his stimulus act which made it easier for adults without jobs or children toreceive food stamp aid. Obama also increased the total allotted benefit amount by 15 percent. Meanwhile, American poverty figures are absolutely staggering. A full third of the country’s population are considered working poor. One out of every seven Americans is on food stamps now, the highest number since the program’s inception. In fact, the USDA doled out $75 billion dollars in food stamps throughout fiscal year 2011, more than double the $34.6 billion spent in 2008. The county is ripe with economic strife. Our national deficit is nearly $16 trillion dollars. While $3 million must seem like a drop in the bucket, federally funded food stamp advertisements raise an obvious and troubling question. At a time when more people than ever before are relying on the government to buy their food, why in the world would the USDA spend millions in an attempt to boost enrollment in an already overburdened program?
  • According to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, foodstamps actually stimulate the economy and create jobs: Pelosi shared Vilsack’s sentiment at a pressconference back in 2010 when she claimed, “It is thebiggest bang for the buck when you do food stamps andunemployment insurance.”Following this logic, if more people are on food stampsthan ever, then more people should be employed than ever,right? That must be why we have the highest long-termunemployment rates since the Great Depression.The USDA’s radio ads are part of a newly releasedcommunity outreach toolkit which its website explains ismeant to “improve existing SNAP outreach to those whoare eligible but not participating in the program.” This kitalso includes a series of flyers that suggest “fresh ideas” togarner local offices more aid recipients, such as throwingfood stamp “parties,” complete with entertainment and foodstamp info-themed BINGO games.Sounds super fun, right? Perhaps one of the game card squares should read “Road to AmericanSerfdom.”B-I-N-G-O!Madsen Holder scandal may be US attemptto destabilize MexicoPress TVJuly 2, 2012 Holder incident to destabilize Mexico? Video below analyst says the trafficking of guns by theUS to violent cartels in Mexico in a secretoperation has resulted in some of those gunsentering into Arizona.Press TV has interviewed Wayne Madsen,investigative journalist from Washington, aboutthe ramifications of the US running guns acrossthe Mexican border and being caught doing it;and also about the possibility that US AttorneyGeneral Eric Holder, voted by Congress as beingin contempt of Congress, will be pursuedthrough independent prosecution.
  • What follows is an approximate transcript of the interview. Press TV: It’s been said that the Holder case is meant to distract Americans from bigger issues at hand such as the economy and never ending wars etc. Do you agree or is this a lot more significant? Madsen:Well, I think one of the interests in this case may be misplaced somewhat. Of course, the Obama White House says this was a political move, but… and we have to understand it is the Justice Department,which would have to bring charges for this contempt of Congress vote against the attorney general. Well, the attorney general is the head of the Justice Department so it’s rather doubtful that he is going to appoint a prosecutor to have himself prosecuted.So, this is actually more of a symbolic vote by the House. They knew this wasn’t going to goanywhere, but there’s another issue.The issue is that anytime the National Rifle Association thinks that guns are an issue and it could berestricted, they have their people in Congress vote for their legislation. So we saw some 17 Democratsvote with Republicans to cite Holder for contempt of Congress – I think only two Republicans joinedthe Democrats in opposition.But we also know that there are a lot of strange things going on in Mexico with the two major drugcartels, Las Zetas and the Sinaloa cartel and the fact is that guns from the US wound up in the hands ofthese cartels.There’s a conspiracy theory amongst the NRA that this is a means by the Obama administration to tryto restrict guns, but there’s also another thought that this is an attempt to destabilize Mexico. There’s a big presidential election in Mexico on Sunday and the mere fact that we could see a return of the PRI Party candidates, which ruled Mexico for decades, there could be much more to what’s going on with the running of guns from the US into Mexico.And I’m told from sources in Arizona that guns arecoming back across the border from Mexico into stateslike Arizona that share a border with Mexico… So I’mwondering whether there’s an intelligence operation goingon and that is why Mr. Holder decided to stonewallbecause his record shows that he will protect the interestsof all US intelligence operations and this may be anattempt by the US to destabilize Mexico.
  • Press TV: I want to pick up on your point about the Justice Department. Doesn’t the fact that Holder’s case will be referred to prosecutors under him unearth a vital flaw, maybe, in the judicial system? It seems the US attorney general is in a sense above the law as no prosecutor would want to jeopardize his or her own position. Madsen: Absolutely. And this is why many times we saw independent special councils or independent prosecutors named, to get that individual out from any kind of coercion from the attorney general. We saw during Watergate with the independent Watergate prosecutor; we saw it again in the move against President Clinton that ended up in his impeachment – of course, he was found not guilty bythe Senate. But we have seen these special prosecutors appointed because of this very issue. It’s always stated that the attorney general is not a political position. It’s somehow different from the other members of the Cabinet, but we’ve seen from past history with the Attorney General John Mitchell under Richard Nixon and Edwin Meese under Reagan that these attorneys general have been highly political and in fact Attorney General Mitchell went to prison because of his activity during the Watergate scandal.So, yes it does point out a flaw in the Independent Counsel Statute, which is now not in force. It wasalways used as a means to prevent the politicization of the Justice Department in these types of matters.Here’s How Much The Obamacare PenaltyTax Will Cost You…Henry BlodgetBusiness InsiderJuly 2, 2012Many Americans are furious that Obamacare will requirethem to buy health insurance.Most of these folks seem to hate the idea that Obama is forcingthem to do something more than they hate the idea of shelling outmoney.But for those who also care about the money, here are the details.The good news is that, for most people, the "penalty tax" forthose who choose not to buy health insurance will cost a lot lessthan health insurance.
  • As with everything tax-related, theres no simpleanswer to "How much is the Obamacare penaltytax?" But here are some key points, • The penalty/tax will be phased in from 2014 to 2016. • The minimum penalty/tax in 2016 will be $695 per person and up to 3-times that per family. After 2016, these amounts will increase at the rate of inflation. • The minimum penalty/tax per person will start at $95 in 2014 (and then increase through 2016) • No family will ever pay more than 3X the per-person penalty, regardless of how many people are in the family. • The $695 per-person penalty is only for those who make between $9,500 and ~$37,000 per year. If you make less than ~$9.500, youre exempt. If you make more than ~$37,000, your penalty is calculated by the following formula... • The penalty is 2.5% of any household income above the level at which you are required to file a tax return. That level is currently $9,500 per person and $19,000 per couple. The penalty on any income above that is 2.5%. So the penalty can get expensive quickly if you make a lot of money. • However, the penalty can never be more than the cost of a "Bronze" heath insurance plan purchased through one of the state "exchanges" that will be created as part of Obamacare. The CBO estimates that these policies will cost $4,500-$5,000 per person and $12,000-$12,500 per family in 2016, with the costs rising thereafter.So, basically, youre looking at penalties of approximately the following at the following income levels: • Less than $9,500 income = $0 • $9,500 - $37,000 income = $695 • $50,000 income = $1,000 • $75,000 income = $1,600 • $100,000 income = $2,250 • $125,000 income = $2,900 • $150,000 income = $3,500 • $175,000 income = $4,100 • $200,000 income = $4,700 • Over $200,000 = The cost of a "bronze" health-insurance planThe IRS will collect the penalty-tax, a fact that will no doubt further enrage those who hate Obamacare.But heres some more good news for those folks:
  • The IRS will not have the power to charge you criminally or seize your assets if you refuse to pay. TheIRS will only have the ability to sue you. And the most the IRS can collect from you if it wins the suitis 2X the amount you owe. So if you want to thumb your nose at the penalty-tax, the IRS wont be ableto do as much to you as they could if you refused to pay, say, income tax.By the way, the following folks will be exempt from the penalty-tax: • Those who make less than $9,500 • Employees whose employers only offer plans that cost more than 8% of the employees income • Those with "hardships" • Members of Indian tribes • Members of certain religions that dont pay Social Security tax, such as Amish, Hutterites, or MennonitesAnd, of course, Obamacare isnt free. So, whether you pay the penalty or not, youre going to have topay a lot of other taxes to pay for it. Here they are >The Obama Deception The Truth About Barry Soetoro AKA Barack Obama VIDEO BELOW of the Republic The Destruction of America VIDEO BELOW Blue Print to Global Enslavement VIDEO BELOW