• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Obama’s DHS Aids Human Traffickers Smuggling Illegals Into The US
 

Obama’s DHS Aids Human Traffickers Smuggling Illegals Into The US

on

  • 381 views

Obama’s DHS Aids Human Traffickers

Obama’s DHS Aids Human Traffickers
Smuggling Illegals Into The US

Statistics

Views

Total Views
381
Views on SlideShare
378
Embed Views
3

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 3

https://twitter.com 3

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Obama’s DHS Aids Human Traffickers Smuggling Illegals Into The US Obama’s DHS Aids Human Traffickers Smuggling Illegals Into The US Document Transcript

    • Obama’s DHS Aids Human Traffickers Smuggling Illegals Into The US By Tim Brown Jan 1, 2014 US District Court Judge Andrew S. Hanen, in a December ruling, claims that the Obama administration’s Homeland Security Department has been openly violating US law by conspiring to smuggle illegal immigrants into the United States. As if all the other scandals that are enveloping this administration weren’t enough, it seems they are now openly aiding an invasion of our country, which again, should be declared as treasonous. The accusations were contained in the judge’s ruling against Mirtha Veronica Nava-Martinez, who plead guilty to attempting to smuggle a tenyear-old El Salvadorean girl, identified only as Y.P.S. in the ruling, into the United States in violation of federal law. Nava-Martinez was caught at the Brownsville & Matamoros Bridge checkpoint. Patricia Elizabeth Salmeron Santos had solicited human traffickers, of which Nava-Martinez is an admitted trafficker, to smuggle her daughter into Virginia. She eventually agreed to pay $8,500 (paying $6,000 in advance) to traffic her daughter into the country. The Texas federal judge accused DHS of delivering children, illegally smuggled into the US to their illegal immigrant parents. “This action makes the DHS complicit in aiding that Mexican drug cartels that control the people smuggling rings,” writes Hanen. He added that the “government is not only allowing (illegal immigrants in the US) to fund the illegal and evil activities of these cartels, but is also inspiring them to do so.” Judge Hanen wrote that in more than one case that has been before his court, members of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a federal agency under DHS, have arrested human traffickers, who are smuggling children illegally into the US, then “delivering the minors to the custody of the parent illegally living in the United States.” In fact, He was quite blatant in his ruling. After describing what took place in apprehending NavaMartinez, Hanen wrote, “Despite this setback (referring to the arrest of Nava-Martinez before she could deliver the girl), the goal of the conspiracy was successfully completed thanks to the actions of the United States Government. This Court is quite concerned with the apparent policy of the Department of Homeland Security of completing the criminal mission of individuals who are violating the border security of the United States.” Even more telling, is the fact that the illegal who instigated the entire process was not only not arrested, but given her child! “Customs and Border Protection agents stopped the Defendant at the border inspection point,” Hanen wrote. “She was arrested, and the child was taken into custody. The DHS officials were notified that
    • Salmeron Santos instigated this illegal conduct. Yet, instead of arresting Salmeron Santos for instigating the conspiracy to violate our border security laws, the DHS delivered the child to her – thus successfully completing the mission of the criminal conspiracy. It did not arrest her. It did not prosecute her. It did not even initiate deportation proceedings for her.” “Time and again this court has been told by representatives of the government and the defense that cartels control the entire smuggling process,” Hanen wrote. “… the government is not only allowing [illegal immigrants in the U.S.] to fund the illegal and evil activities of these cartels, but is also inspiring them to do so. To put this in another context, the DHS policy is as logical as taking illegal drugs or weapons that it has seized from smugglers and delivering them to the criminals who initially solicited their illegal importation/exportation. Legally, this situation is no different.” “The DHS could reunite the parent and child by apprehending the parent who has committed not one, but at least two different crimes,” Judge Hanen wrote. “It would be more efficient for the Government to arrest the individuals who are not only in the country illegally, but while in the country illegally are also fostering illegal conspiracies…. It would also be much cheaper to apprehend those co-conspirators and reunite them at the children’s location,” he added. “Yet, it neither prosecutes nor deports the wrongdoer.” In other words, the administration is “rewarding criminal conduct instead of enforcing the current laws.” Judge Hanen says that there is absolutely no justification for the action of the DHS officials’ unlawful behavior. ”The DHS has simply chosen not to enforce the United States’ border security laws,” he said. He also added that DHS was turning a “blind eye” to criminal conduct and in the process, participating “in and complete the mission of a criminal conspiracy or to encourage parents to put their minor children in perilous situations subject to the whims of evil individuals.” Hanen adds, “These actions are both dangerous and unconscionable. The DHS has simply chosen not to enforce the United States’ border security laws.” Finally, there is someone that will call this administration’s actions for what they are: criminal. The question now is when will Salmeron Santos be arrested and she and her daughter deported? When will the DHS officials involved be terminated and arrested for their criminal activity and when will those who are over them be held accountable to the law?
    • Eugenics & Obamacare – The Ultimate in Political Manipulation By Ed Wood on Jan 1, 2014 Eugenics. It’s a word we don’t hear much these days, but its results are all around us. Back on the farm we called it “selective breeding.” Every dairyman or herdsman or Kentucky Derby contender selects the best of his herd as breeding stock. Can the same principle be applied to humans? Of course. Adolph Hitler used the practice to create what he called a “master race.” Loretta Lynn and Conway Twitty recorded, “You Are the Reason Our Kids are Ugly.” Nobody wants ugly kids, so in this enlightened era of single motherhood, sperm banks catalog their inventory according to eye color, hair color, nose shape, etc. Eugenics? Of course. Harmless? Probably. But are more sinister uses possible? Certainly. Is the concept new? Of course not. The founder of eugenics, Sir Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin, felt that the softness of civilization had prevented the kind of natural selection occurring in Darwin’s Origin of Species from happening in humans, thus creating an unnaturally high number of weak and feeble-minded people. So it was up to governments to augment natural selection through the practice of selective breeding — or eugenics. At that time it was felt that desirable citizens tended to be white, athletic, intelligent, and wealthy, and those it considered to be undesirable tended to be black, Jewish, disabled, or poor. So the power of the state was, and still is, encouraged to promote increases in the number of desirable citizens (positive eugenics) and decreases in the number of undesirable citizens (negative eugenics). Now if you are a genetic scientist, you would want to pursue such DNA manipulation just for the sake of science. The ultimate, of course, would be mass cloning. It’s already been done in sheep and rabbits — although rabbits seem to be doing pretty well in replicating themselves without any outside assistance. Humans? Why not? In his bestselling new book, Things That Matter, psychiatrist Dr. Charles Krauthammer says the limits on human cloning are moral, not scientific. So one day it will happen. But if you are a “public servant,” hell-bent on keeping yourself in office, you might want to pursue such manipulation just to assure an expanding base of political support. So how would you go about creating more of those who would vote for you, and fewer of those who wouldn’t? Would you call it eugenics? Of course not. You would call it providing for the common good; probably through the enactment of a government sponsored and controlled healthcare program. In her recent interview with the BBC, Oprah Winfrey may have inadvertently revealed the real reason for the government to take control of the health care system: “racist cleansing” of our nation. Said Ms. Winfrey, “You know, as long as people can be judged by the color of their skin, problem’s not solved. As long as there is still a whole generation of people, older people, who were born and bred and
    • marinated in it, in that prejudice and racism, they just have to die.” So are the cuts in Medicare, leading to fewer doctors treating seniors, leading to a reduction in access to care and therefore the rationing of care itself, part and parcel of the grand plan to actually hasten the death of all the old, white racists? Please keep in mind that in a recently released Huffington Post poll, Oprah is still right up there in popularity, and even ranks more favorably than does First Lady Michelle Obama. Her opinions must resonate somewhere. So what would you do if the success of your namesake program, Obamacare, is threatened by the number of older and less healthy people signing up and thus overwhelming the enlistment of younger and healthier enrollees? Does this then lead us to the dreaded words, “death panel”? Maybe. On August 8, 2013, the Oregon Health Evidence Review Commission (HERC) unanimously approved revisions to the guideline that assists patients, doctors, and health plans in the care of patients with advanced stage cancer; and instructs them to focus on “efficacy of care,” rather than life expectancy. According to the guideline, “this approach has been shown in scientific studies to improve cancer patients’ lives and allows these patients to spend more time with their families instead of in hospitals.” Sure it does. All right then. Is this what the President had in mind when he told a Mrs. Jane Strum that a heart transplant for her aging mother, “costs a lot and maybe we will have to say, just take a pill”? If, in 1812, the so-called “desirable citizens” tended to be white, athletic, intelligent, and wealthy, what are the desirable citizens of today? Surely not those! The politicians and bureaucrats currently writing most of our societal rules and regulations tend to gain their support from those who are younger, less educated, favor greater government dependency, and are generally persons of color. So we may now look for more government activity in support of these groups — positive eugenics. As Obamacare kicks in, those of us who remain; the older, the sicker, the political opposition, can expect to experience the effects of, you guessed it — negative eugenics. Population Control: The Eugenics Connection - Part 1 VIDEO BELOW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVhE3Muh3co Population Control: The Eugenics Connection - Part 2 VIDEO BELOW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=feJza0S7AeA Population Control: The Eugenics Connection - Part 3 VIDEO BELOW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1p-Xxcwx0U INFOWARS.COM BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND