National Security Threat: Obama’s Birth Certificate Proven Fraudulent
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

National Security Threat: Obama’s Birth Certificate Proven Fraudulent



One of the biggest cover-ups in U.S....

One of the biggest cover-ups in U.S.
political history
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s
cold case posse has confirmed that
President Barack Obama’s birth
certificate is “definitely fraudulent,”
prompting the media and political
establishment to launch a frenzied spin
campaign in an effort to deflect attention
from the astounding new evidence
uncovered by the investigation



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

National Security Threat: Obama’s Birth Certificate Proven Fraudulent National Security Threat: Obama’s Birth Certificate Proven Fraudulent Document Transcript

  • National Security Threat: Obama’s BirthCertificate Proven FraudulentPaul Joseph WatsonInfowars.comWednesday, July 18, 2012One of the biggest cover-ups in U.S.political historyMaricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’scold case posse has confirmed thatPresident Barack Obama’s birthcertificate is “definitely fraudulent,”prompting the media and politicalestablishment to launch a frenzied spincampaign in an effort to deflect attentionfrom the astounding new evidenceuncovered by the investigation.Video 2: The Manual Coding On Barack Obamas Birth Certificate Proves Its Not Legit videobelow addition to the deluge of previous evidence clearly proving Obama’s long form birth certificate hadbeen tampered with, including the fact that when analyzed the document clearly shows that layered texthas been added in artificially and that the scan of the document is not an original, Arpaio and his posseunearthed tantalizing new information.The most stunning revelation is the fact that in numerous places, Obama’s birth certificate has hadinformation added at a later date than the original.The posse was able to obtain the original 1961 coding guide used to fill in the birth certificates at theexact time Obama’s document was filed. For example, when describing the “race of father,” thenumber 9 on the coding guide indicates “unknown or not stated.”The number 9 appears on Obama’s birth certificate in section 9 entitled “race of father.” This meansthat the race of Obama’s father was unknown or not stated at the time the original birth certificate wasfiled. However, the box also contains the word “African,” which was not even used as a descriptiveterm at the time. The fact that the document contradicts itself in that it denotes the “race of father” asnot stated but then also “African” clearly indicates that “African” was added in at a later date.The same error can be found in box 12b, “kind of business or industry,” which is also marked with anumber 9 to denote ‘not stated’ yet also contains the word “University,” again clearly suggesting thedocument was tampered with at a later date.Sheriff Arpaio has now promised to elevate the issue to a higher authority within the federalgovernment.“Although I am having a difficult time deciding who to forward this information to given the fact that
  • the obvious choices report directly to the president, I cannot stand by and hold on to information that threatens to weaken national security,” said Arpaio. If you’re wondering how the media and the political establishment will respond to this latest bombshell evidence that Obama’s background is completely fraudulent, look no further than two of the individuals featured in a Fox 10 news report. Instead of attempting to respond to the astounding facts about the fraudulent nature of the birth certificate unearthed during the investigation, critics resorted to emotional manipulation.Former Arizona Attorney General Grant Woods labeled the issue “an absolute joke” and questionedwhy Arpaio would even look into the matter, before falsely claiming that most conservatives had“given up on this issue,” when in reality polls show that a majority of likely Republican votersbelieve that Obama was born in another country. Woods also labeled the matter “fake” and “offensive,”relying on the use of emotive words rather than challenging the facts surrounding the suspect birthcertificate.Democrat Paul Penzone, who is running against Arpaio for Maricopa County Sheriff, also displayed ajaw-dropping disregard for irony when he responded to the new evidence by stating, “I feel like it’sgroundhog day, I’m hearing the same thing over and over again but you’re not going to convince meotherwise – I don’t want to hear any more.”In other words, ‘my mind’s already made up – don’t bother me with the facts.’“The media has demeaned this investigation at every turn assilly and wasteful,” said Lisa Allen, MCSO spokesperson. “Wesimply ask right now that you put your preconceived notionsabout this listen to the facts and if you can keep an openmind.”However, none of the criticism of the investigation has daredto address the facts because they cannot be shot down. Instead,opponents of Sheriff Arpaio have cast aspersions aboutpolitical motivations behind the investigation while othershave resorted to name calling and petty jibes.No matter what spin the media and political establishmentattempt to put on this, the facts cannot be denied. PresidentObama’s birth certificate betrays innumerable instances clearlyindicating that the document has been tampered with in aneffort to manufacture the myth that Obama was born in theUnited States.The manifestly logical conclusion that he was not creates an urgent national security threat andrepresents one of the biggest cover-ups in U.S. political history.Arpaio: Obama birth record has been tampered with video below
  • Obama White House Lauds Syrian SuicideBombingPaul Joseph WatsonInfowars.comWednesday, July 18, 2012Exploits attack to increase pressure onAssadCompletely failing to condemn a suicidebombing which killed several seniorSyrian officials in Damascus today, theObama White House instead lauded theattack as a sign that the “window isclosing” on Bashar Assad’s regime. Whilethe likes of Obama and Hillary Clintonhave been quick to denounce claims ofviolence carried out by Assad’s forceswith vitriolic gusto and emotivehumanitarian condemnation, today’sdeadly bombing was met with thinlyveiled glee.According to a Reuters update, the “White House says violence is not the answer in Syria but attack onAssad’s inner circle shows “window is closing.” White House says international community needs toact in a unified way.”In other words, while claiming violence is not the answer, the Obama administration simultaneouslyupholds the suicide bombing carried out by terrorists as a rhetorical threat against the Assad regime.U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and British Defense Minister Philip Hammond also refused tocondemn the attack, instead using it as a tool to exert “maximum pressure” on Assad to step down.Confused? Let me explain. This is good terrorism. When the terrorists are on the same side as the United States and NATO – as Hillary herself has admitted - acts of terrorism in pursuit of NATO’s geopolitical agenda to overthrow Syria do not require condemnation. Indeed, whenever rebels and NATO-backed Al-Qaeda terrorists carry out another act of bloodshed in Syria, top NATO and U.S. officials find it hard to contain their joy.
  • Following a bombing attack back in May that killed members of Syria’s security forces, USAmbassador to the United Nations Susan Rice reacted not bydenouncing such tactics, but by openly exploiting the bombingto politically threaten Assad.In a series of messages, Rice cited the bombing as a reminderthat Assad should make way for NATO’s neo-colonialism,tweeting, “The longer Assad clings to power, the greater therisk of destabilization in Syria and throughout the region.”“Bombings also remind us of the urgent need for a politicalsolution in Syria before it is too late,” she added.Let’s also not forget Hillary Clinton’s applause, snickering andshameless glee at learning the news of Colonel Gaddafi’sexecution by Libyan rebels last year.In not only failing to condemn the bombings and the terroristsbehind them, but actually lauding such attacks as beingemblematic of the west’s geopolitical agenda in the region, thepolitical leadership of the United States and NATO revealthemselves to be rhetorical terrorists, as well as cheerleaders for some of the very same terrorists whohave killed U.S. and British troops.Whistleblower: NSA AnalyzingConversations In Real TimePaul Joseph WatsonInfowars.comWednesday, July 18, 2012Spy agency has Google-style capability to search all communicationsThe National Security Agency is storing allelectronic communications and analyzingthem in real time, according to former NSAemployee turned whistleblower WilliamBinney, who warns that the federal agencyhas a Google-style capability to search allconversations for keywords.Since 2008, the NSA has had the legalpower to intercept all phone calls, emailsand text messages sent by Americancitizens without probable cause. However,although long suspected, the agency hasnever admitted that it is analyzing the content of such messages, conceding only that persons, dates andlocations are part of the snooping process.
  • However, in a recent sworn declaration to the United States District Court for the Northern District ofCalifornia, Binney, a former NSA employee with the signals intelligence agency within the DoD,divulges that the federal agency, “has the capability to do individualized searches, similar to Google,for particular electronic communications in real time through such criteria as target addresses,locations, countries and phone numbers, as well as watch-listed names, keywords, and phrases inemail.”Using as many as twenty data intercept centers throughout the United States which can each store analmost unimaginable quantity of information, Binney notes that, “The sheer size of that capacityindicates that the NSA is not filtering personal electronic communications such as email before storagebut is, in fact, storing all that they are collecting.”Binney also points to FBI Director Robert Mueller’s 2011 admission that the FBI, with the aid of theNSA and DoD, had “put in place technological improvements relating to the capabilities of a databaseto pull together past emails as well as … and future ones as they come in so that it does not require an individualized search.” Binney said he quit the NSA in 2001 because “the individual liberties preserved in the U.S. Constitution were no longer a consideration,” after 9/11. Binney’s revelations coalesce with the fact that, according to many privacy experts, the NSA has been intercepting and recording all electronic communications across the entire world since at least the early 1990′s. In 1999, the Australian government admitted that they were part of an NSA-ledglobal intercept and surveillance program called Echelon in alliance with the US and Britain that couldlisten to “every international telephone call, fax, e-mail, or radio transmission,” on the planet.In addition, a 2001 European Parliament report stated that “within Europe all e-mail, telephone and faxcommunications are routinely intercepted” by the NSA.Under the Clinton Administration Echelon certainly turned its attention to citizens of countries aroundthe globe and monitored millions of calls and other communications.Echelon expert Mike Frost, who spent 20 years as a spy for the Canadian equivalent of the NationalSecurity Agency, told CBS’s “60 Minutes” that the agency was monitoring “everything from datatransfers to cell phones to portable phones to baby monitors to ATMs.”Last month the NSA refused to provide details of its clandestine spying program, ironically arguing thatto do so would violate the privacy of American citizens.When Senators Ron Wyden and Mark Udall of the intelligence oversight committee asked that the NSAprovide a rough estimate as to how many U.S. citizens have had their communications monitored underthe expanded Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the federal agency refused to provide the figurebecause it would “further violate the privacy of U.S. persons.”