How the post-Sandy Hook gun control push spectacularly backfired in America
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

How the post-Sandy Hook gun control push spectacularly backfired in America

on

  • 345 views

In the aftermath of the tragic Sandy Hook shooting, the gun grabbers across America unleashed a full ...

In the aftermath of the tragic Sandy Hook shooting, the gun grabbers across America unleashed a full
court press to try to wholly disarm American citizens. With the help of the incessantly anti-gun
mainstream media, people like Biden, Bloomberg, Cuomo, Feinstein and Obama managed to stir up a
frenzy of fabricated fear that promised all our children would be violently gunned down if we didn’t
immediately agree to turn in all our guns and ammo magazines.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
345
Views on SlideShare
345
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    How the post-Sandy Hook gun control push spectacularly backfired in America How the post-Sandy Hook gun control push spectacularly backfired in America Document Transcript

    • How the post-Sandy Hook gun control pushspectacularly backfired in AmericaMike AdamsNatural NewsFeb 6, 2013In the aftermath of the tragic Sandy Hook shooting, the gun grabbers across America unleashed a fullcourt press to try to wholly disarm American citizens. With the help of the incessantly anti-gunmainstream media, people like Biden, Bloomberg, Cuomo, Feinstein and Obama managed to stir up afrenzy of fabricated fear that promised all our children would be violently gunned down if we didn’timmediately agree to turn in all our guns and ammo magazines.The push for gun control, however, has spectacularly backfired. In reality, it has hardened thepositions of gun rights advocates while massively increasing the number of AR-15s and other firearmssold across the country.The backfire is far worse than the gun grabbers could have possibly imagined when they launched theirefforts on the graves of the dead Sandy Hook children. Here’s my analysis of what has factuallyhappened on the gun control front since Sandy Hook.Analysis of ways in which the gun grab backfired• Instead of reducing sales of AR-15s and other firearms in America, the gun grab dramaticallyincreased sales of nearly all firearms beyond any previous record. In essence, the Americanpeople bought nearly every gun available anywhere in the country, leaving gun store shelvesempty. The upshot of all this? 10+ million new firearms in the hands of citizens and a one-year backlogof gun orders with manufacturers.• Instead of shrinking the influence of the NRA, the gun grab vastly expanded NRA membership.More than 300,000 new members have been added to the NRA’s roster in just the last few months, andthe association has become more steeled in its position than ever before. The NRA has shifted even
    • more dramatically against gun restrictions thanever before, even reversing itself on the issueof “gun free school zones” after learning thatsuch zones don’t work. Gun Owners ofAmerica has also seen its membership numberssoar.• The backlash against Obama, Biden, PiersMorgan and others has been so powerful andpersistent that Obama had to stage a photoop of himself shooting a shotgun in order tocreate the impression that he was “pro gun.”Similarly, anti-gun CNN host Piers Morgan hasnow broadcast a video of himself shooting anAR-15 in Katy, Texas, while softening hisposition and saying he was never against theSecond Amendment in the first place. (Yeah,right…)How big of a deal is all this? It’s huge! Imagine Piers Morgan picking up an AR-15 the day after theSandy Hook shooting. Never would have happened, right? Or imagine Obama allowing himself to bephotographed shooting a shotgun. These images would have been unimaginable mere weeks ago, butthe gun grab push has backfired so completely that even the Second Amendment’s most outspokencritics are practically lining up to be photographed or filmed shooting guns.• Instead of silencing all the gun advocates and owners across the nation, the effort has actually causedpeople to break their silence on the issue and go vocal with their true beliefs on the topic. I’m aperfect example of this: before Sandy Hook, I hardly ever mentioned firearms. After Sandy Hook, I’vebeen one of the most outspoken voices of gun rights and the Second Amendment, and I’ve actuallyfound that instead of losing an audience, I’ve gained a huge number of new subscribers who agreewith me on this issue. Check the Alexa stats; Natural News is steadily gaining in web traffic even as wecover this issue.Other people have done much the same thing. My friend Daniel Vitalis, best known for longevitysupplements and preparedness know-how, has even gone public with his own pro-gun column, and thefeedback from his health-oriented audience has been mostly positive.• The emotionally-loaded “Demand A Plan” Hollywood video, featuring dozens of top stars trying toconvince us we need to disarm ourselves, was very quickly turned into a laughing stock due to therelease of far more informative video showing most of those stars using guns to commit bloody murderon the big screen. The hypocrisy was inescapable: Hollywood people want to claim they are againstguns, but much of their income is based on movies that feature horrific scenes of violent shootings.• While the gun grabbers wanted sheriffs and cops to jump on board the gun disarmament bandwagon,what actually happened is that sheriffs began speaking out AGAINST gun control and encouragingtheir local constituents to arm themselves. Sheriffs across the country — in huge numbers — publiclyproclaimed they would not allow federal agents to enforce gun restrictionsin their counties.• While gun grabbers wanted states to fall in line and surrender to federal authority on the issue of guncontrol, what actually happened is that the Firearms Protection Act began to be introduced in statelegislatures such as Wyoming and Texas. This act, which is now being considered in more than a dozenother states, would make it a felony crime for anyone to enforce new federal gun restrictions in theirstates.
    • • While gun grabbers hoped the U.S. military would agree to fire upon American citizens who refused to turn in their guns, what really happened is that huge numbers of active duty soldiers announced they would never participate in military action against their own countrymen. In fact, inside the military there is rising talk of shooting commanding officers in the head if they order troops to fire on American citizens over gun rights issues. • While the gun grabbers hoped to demonize gun owners and “shame” them into somehow feeling guilty about Sandy Hook, what actually happened is that gun owners found new courage and American pride, and they have loudly voiced their intention to wage a war of resistance against any government that attempts to take their guns. • In New York state, where Mayor Cuomo managed to quickly shove through an illegal, unconstitutionalgun control law, there is now open talk of armed resistance against the state government. Elsewhere,there is even talk that U.S. Senators who vote for gun control may see their own staffers and familiestargeted for assassination. As Stewart Rhodes said on InfoWars Nightly News on December 31st, 2012:“They will be targeted. I think that if they pass this bill, legislators who vote for it will beassassinated… they’re going to be military targets, too, and they’re going to be killed. They thinkthey’re immune, but they’re not. They cannot walk around with enough security to keep from beingshot by a sniper.” – Stewart Rhodes, OathKeepers.org(For the record, Stewart Rhodes is not calling for this action. He is merely stating the obvious: that thisis likely to take place if gun confiscation comes up for a vote in the U.S. Senate.)It’s not just Stewart Rhodes saying this, either. Robbie Cooper from UrbanUndergrounds.com saysmuch the same thing:“We all quickly agreed a violentrevolution and rebellion would occuralmost immediately [following afederal gun ban]. Most, if not all,members of Congress who voted forthe ban / confiscation would beassassinated. And the very first preythat would find themselves in thescopes of the rebels would be themembers of Congress who passed thisban and the members of the mediawho have been their willingmouthpieces and agents ofpropaganda.”Bob Owens from Bob-Owens.compaints a similar picture:
    • “The 535 members of the House and Senate in both parties that allowed such a law to pass wouldlargely be on their own; the Secret Service is too small to protect all of them and their families, theCapitol Police too unskilled, and competent private security not particularly interested in workingagainst their own best interests at any price. The elites will be steadily whittled down, and if theycannot be reached directly, the targets will become their staffers, spouses, children, and grandchildren.Grandstanding media figures loyal to the regime would die in droves, executed as enemies of theRepublic.”For the record once again, these people are not calling for such actions, they are merely predicting whatis likely to take place. A government that attempts to disarm the citizenry at gunpoint isessentially declaring war on the People and should expect to be treated like an occupying enemy ofAmerica. On top of that, the real power in all this is that there is no central leader of any suchrebellion. These actions would organically rise out of the population in the form of independent, self-initiated teams of armed defenders who are willing to risk their lives to save America from tyranny.Veteran firearms instructor Paul Howe even penned a popular piece called 2nd Amendment and theKool-Aid Drinkers in which he explains one popular solution for handling those who attempt to engagein gun confiscation:Should firearm confiscation begin, solutions are simple. If they cannot live in a community, they cannotwork in a community. If their house goes away while they are at work confiscating guns, so be it. Allowthem to leave with their family and what possessions they can pack in their car.Howe also explains, in other interviews, that gun confiscation teams — “tac teams” — should expect tobe attacked without warning and take huge casualties, reducing the effectiveness of those teams andeffectively ending gun confiscation activities.Thank you, Obama, Biden, Cuomo and FeinsteinIn all, the gun grabbers in America have become the single most effective gun rights recruitmentteam in U.S. history.They have awakened people to the truth about the need for a Second Amendment and the ever-presentrisk of tyrannical government trying to dominate a free people. They have encouraged the sale of 10+million firearms which are now held in the hands of private citizens. They have swelled the ranks of theNRA and Gun Owners of America. They have proven all the so-called “conspiracy theorists” rightabout claims that the government is coming for our guns.The post-Sandy Hook actions of the gun grabbers have actually set back the gun control agenda by atleast a decade. Americans are on high alert now, and they realize there is more than enough criticalmass of resistance to stand up against any gun registration or confiscation scheme that might beattempted by an arrogant, unconstitutional and lawless government.Obama has effectively declared himself KingRemember, the Obama administration openly claims the right to order the execution of Americancitizens without trial, without evidence and without any due process. A President who would justifythose actions could justify anything, including nationwide gun confiscation, forced FEMA camp round-ups of citizens, military troops on the streets of U.S. cities and so on. Obama believes there is NOLIMIT to his power, and as a result he is, by definition, a totalitarianistic tyrant.But Obama does not have the loyalty of the military, nor the sheriffs, nor most police departments. Heis absolutely hated by gun owners and political conservatives. His circle of followers is weak andshrinking by the day. His political supporters are largely inner city welfare recipients who, as historyhas shown, matter little in the equation of human history.
    • Liberty is winning in America, and it will continue to win as long as you remain ever vigilant,knowing that the federal government is constantly scheming and conspiring to dream up ways to blamegun owners for tragic events and thereby invoke a false justification for disarming the citizens andcreating a “monopoly of violence” of government.Warning: How the gun grabbers could still winDo not allow the victory of the moment to cloud your vision for the future, however. The gun grabbersare, right now, scheming up new ways to blame gun owners and pass gun confiscation in America.Operation Fast and Furious, for example, was designed from the very start (and at the highest levels) tocause runaway gun violence near the U.S. – Mexico border, providing an excuse to try to ban gunseverywhere across America. It failed because they got caught, but it shows that if they will stage Fastand Furious, they will stage anything.You can bet your bottom dollar that high-level operatives inside the Obama administration are rightnow plotting another mass murder event to be blamed on gun owners. These are called “false flag”attacks, and the most likely scenarios that may be carried out include:• A staged mass shooting at an airport security checkpoint where TSA officers are gunned down. Thefederal response will be to demand that the TSA be armed, and this is how Obama will create his“domestic security force” much like Hitler’s brownshirts.• Another bombing of a federal building or local police station. Expect the patsy to be a drugged-upmilitary veteran who owns lots of guns and whose computer just happens to have a history of visitingwebsites like InfoWars.com. Expect Alex Jones to be blamed for everything.• A repeat of Sandy Hook with lots and lots of dead children. Schools still remain “gun free zones”which means they are wide-open shooting galleries for psychos who don’t want anyone to shoot back.The more children die, the more political power the gun grabbers can squeeze out of the tragedy whilesomehow blaming the NRA.• A dirty bomb released in a major U.S. city and blamed on “patriots” or some anti-government group.Of course, as we already know, a group within the FBI masterminds many of these domestic terrorplots — this is openly admitted by the FBI and was even published in the New York Times, believe itor not.• A mass shooting at a sports stadium in order to terrorize sports crowds. This is why it’s smart to avoidsports crowds for the foreseeable future.In all these theoretical events, you can expect high-capacity magazines, AR-15 rifles and possibly evensilencers (suppressors) to be planted on the scene in order to provide justification for those items to bebanned. Whatever the government wants to take away from the citizens, it simply arranges to havethem dropped off at the next staged mass murder scene. Want an example? There was no AR-15 rifleused in the Sandy Hook shooting. That narrative is a total hoax.Five years ago, all this would have sounded like a kooky conspiracy theory. Today, gun owners allacross America have come to realize this is fact. The government really does stage mass killings inorder to forward its political agenda. They really are coming after your guns. And yes, they really didstage Fast and Furious for the purpose of causing enough mass death near the border to justify new guncontrol laws.Thank you, Obama and Feinstein, for showing your cards and proving us right. America is now moreawake, more vigilant and far better armed than before Sandy Hook. You have managed to achieveprecisely the opposite of what you had hoped, and the spirit of liberty in America is stronger than ever.
    • New York’s Gun-grabber Governor Comparedto Hitler and MussoliniKurt NimmoInfowars.comFebruary 6, 2013New York state Assemblyman Steven F. McLaughlin has taken flak for comparing governorAndrew Cuomo to Hitler and Mussolini due to the methods used to ram through a draconian gun law inthe state. “We’re told basically to shut up and vote, and that’s what this is all about,” McLaughlin saidduring a news conference. “Just don’t question it, just vote. That’s basically the message here. If that’snot dictatorial, I don’t know what is.“Hitler would be proud. Mussolini would be proud of what we did here. Moscow would be proud, butthat’s not democracy.”McLaughlin defended his remarks after he was challenged by the corporate media. “How does Putinact over in Russia?” he asked. “Same thing. Dictate to the Legislature what they’re going to do.They’re rubber-stamping it. I’m not calling the governor a dictator. I’m saying that this was thedictatorial thing to do.”The Assemblyman later issued a video apologizing for his remarks.In January, the NRA and other pro-Second Amendment groups criticized Cuomo and the New YorkSenate for their underhanded effort to force passage of the legislation designed to undercut the SecondAmendment.“Governor Andrew Cuomo, in stunningly brazen fashion, took a hatchet to gun rights in New York withlightning speed.” the NRA reported. “By cutting secret deals behind closed doors, eliminating publicinput and circumventing normal legislative processes, the Governor and state Senate passed sweepinganti-gun measures.”Cuomo’s approval among Republicans, Independents and even Democrats plummeted after he forcedthe legislation through. A Quinnipiac University poll released in late January revealed the Democratgovernor dropped from his all-time high approval rating of 74 percent in December to 59 percent, the
    • Associated Press reported.“Cuomo blames the drop on the public’s misunderstanding of the gun measures, which he rushed intolaw without public hearings or the required public review period,” the AP noted.Steve McLaughlin Compares Cuomo to Hitler, Mussolini VIDEO BELOWhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wAyi6No42ioIs The NYPD’s “Protect & Serve” Policy AThing Of The Past?Luke RudkowskiWeAreChange.orgFebruary 6, 2013NYPD refused to intervene during an in-progress stabbing on a subway, where officers watched aman fend off a serial killer attacking him.Is there a duty to protect & serve?WeAreChange recently got the opportunity to meet and Interview Joe Lozito, the selfless hero who puthis life on the line to stop a serial killer. The story is only magnified when Joe finds out, that whilebeing stabbed by the serial killer, the NYPD was standing by watching everything unfold from thesafety of the conductors door. Currently in a legal suit, the NYPD and City of NY is arguing that theNYPD has NO duty to protect its own citizens.Is The NYPDs "Protect & Serve" Policy A Thing Of The Past? VIDEO BELOWhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=xZKVSNjlSp0http://www.infowars.com/