UPDATED Family Guy Episode Predicted Boston Marathon Attack
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

UPDATED Family Guy Episode Predicted Boston Marathon Attack



Scenes deleted for rebroadcasts

Scenes deleted for rebroadcasts



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 4

https://twitter.com 4



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

UPDATED Family Guy Episode Predicted Boston Marathon Attack UPDATED Family Guy Episode Predicted Boston Marathon Attack Document Transcript

  • UPDATED Family Guy Episode PredictedBoston Marathon AttackPaul Joseph WatsonInfowars.comApril 16, 2013 Scenes deleted for rebroadcastsAn episode of the popular show FamilyGuy which was first aired less than amonth ago eerily predicted aspects ofthe Boston Marathon attack, depictingthe main character detonating twobombs in addition to winning themarathon by killing the rest of theparticipants.The episode, named Turban Cowboy,centers around Peter becomingembroiled with terrorists who plan onblowing up bridges in Boston. Theshow aired on March 17, just under amonth ago on the Fox network and hasbeen repeated in recent days.The image of Peter killing the BostonMarathon runners even shows bloodand missing limbs, a chilling reminder of the very real scenes of carnage we saw yesterday.It is important to note that the video shows two clips from different points of the show edited together,but they are from the same episode.Critics responded to the episode by remarking that it “feels like an episode made in 2002 and left on theshelf for a decade.”The plot was so similar to the tragic events in Boston yesterday that scenes have been deleted forrebroadcasts.Family Guy Episode Predicted Boston Marathon Attack! VIDEO BELOWhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFXLKtZoABgSimpsons 911 Prediction VIDEO BELOWhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ifu2Uy21yURugrats in Paris - 9/11 Symbolism (2001) VIDEO BELOWhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDzYp_sygSoCartoons That Predicted 9/11 *Compilation* VIDEO BELOWhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZAqp5GpLNI
  • Obama Adversaries to be Blamed ForBoston Attack?Paul Joseph WatsonInfowars.comApril 16, 2013Democratic operatives urged Presidentto exploit terrorRahm Emanuel’s call to “never let aserious crisis go to waste” is really goingto come to the fore this week ifyesterday’s Boston Marathon attack isblamed on Barack Obama’s politicalopposition, with Democratic operativeshaving previously urged the President toexploit terror in order to reinvigorate hispresidency.Suggestions that the bombing could havebeen the work of Tea Partiers or anti-taxprotesters have swirled despite the fact thatthe only suspect being questioned inresponse to the attack is a Saudi national.Numerous establishment media outlets have also savaged Alex Jones for suggesting that the federalgovernment could have been complicit in the bombing. Jones’ logic is based on a fact that the NewYork Times reported on last year, that many of the recent domestic terror plots in the United States“were facilitated by the F.B.I.,” a history that goes back until at least 1993 when the FBI gave terroristsreal explosives with which to conduct the first WTC bombing.Indeed, under the auspices of Operation Gladio, the idea of governments carrying out acts of terror andblaming them on political adversaries to alter the political climate was far from a “conspiracy theory,”it was an admitted fact.Operation Gladio was a NATO cold war “stay behind” project designed to demonize politicalopposition and “force the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security,” according to thetestimony of former Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra. In 2000, an Italian parliamentary investigationfound that the 1980 Bologna train bombing, which killed 85 people, was carried out by “men insideItalian state institutions and … men linked to the structures of United States intelligence.”“You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people farremoved from any political game,” Vinciguerra explained in sworn testimony.“The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn tothe state to ask for greater security. This is the political logic that lies behind all the massacres and thebombings which remain unpunished, because the state cannot convict itself or declare itself responsiblefor what happened,” he added.Given the fact that Barack Obama’s political career was launched in the living room of infamous
  • domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, the notion that his administration would use terror to further their agenda is hardly a far fetched idea. Early evidence also clearly suggests that authorities had prior knowledge of the bombings and were running drills immediately beforehand centered around the samepremise while telling marathon runners not to panic. Police later denied they had any warnings or wererunning drills, contradicting eyewitness reports.However, while any suspicion of state involvement has been derided as a baseless conspiracy theory,claims of conservatives being responsible for the attack have begun to proliferate, despite there beingzero evidence to suggest such a scenario.Former Bill Clinton advisor David Axelrod hinted on MSNBC today that the attack could have been aform of tax protest.“We really don’t know who did this — it was tax day. Was it someone who was pro–you know, you justdon’t know,” he said.A US Forest Service PR rep also took to Twitter to blame the bombing on the Tea Party, writing, “I fearnutty logic goes like this … Patriots Day. April 15. Tax Day. Bad government. Boston. Tea Party. Let’sshow ‘em.”Following the Aurora theater massacre last year, Time Magazine lamented the fact that Obama had notbeen forceful enough in seizing upon the tragedy to reinvigorate the evisceration of the secondamendment.However, others have gone even further, to the point of seemingly welcoming terror attacks andbloodshed as a means of helping Obama pose as a tough leader and in turn rallying Americans aroundhis big government agenda.During a 2010 appearance on Chris Matthews’ Hardball, former Clintonite and Democratoperative Mark Penn braze nly stated that Obama would need to take advantage of a massacre to getfresh momentum behind his presidency.“Remember, President Clinton reconnected through Oklahoma, right?” Penn told Matthews. “And thepresident right now seems removed. It wasn’t until that speech [after the bombing] that [Clinton] reallyclicked with the American public. Obama needs a similar defining moment,” said Penn.Penn was not alone in invoking how an act of mass bloodshed could ride to Obama’s political rescue.In an article concerning Obama’s plunging popularity before the 2010 mid-terms, Robert Shapiro,former senior advisor to President Bill Clinton, wrote that the only thing that could conceivably rescueObama’s presidency was a terror attack on the scale of the Oklahoma City bombing.
  • “The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro,adding, “He has to find some way….of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidenceand, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”Given the fact that the FBI admittedly facilitates terrorist attacks, in addition to top Democraticstrategists continually calling on Obama to exploit terrorist attacks in the spirit of Rahm Emanuel’surge to “never let a serious crisis go to waste,” should any link to a Tea Partier, a libertarian, an anti-taxprotester or any political adversary of Obama emerge in the coming days, it will be ruthlessly exploitedby the Obama administration to further entrench the notion - habitually reiterated by the likes of theDHS - that liberty lovers are dangerous terrorists who need to be silenced, discredited, disenfranchisedand pushed to the fringes of society. The Boston MurdersLew Rockwelllewrockwell.comApril 16, 2013This morning, I saw a little of Fox & Friends (3 hearts withbut one IQ). The woman was calling the Boston murderer a“coward.” “America does not do such things!” she yelled. Ofcourse, the US bombs people, including civilians, hund reds oftimes a day with its drones, run by brave guys in Nevadabasements. About 50 innocents are murdered for every allegedterrorist. Earlier this month, 11 little boys were killed inPakistan by drone. But they don’t count. They’re gooks,ragheads, untermenschen, sand n_____, Muslims. www.infowars.com/