• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
DOUCHEBAG ALERT!!!! Bloomberg Demands Obama Take “Executive Action” Against Second Amendment
 

DOUCHEBAG ALERT!!!! Bloomberg Demands Obama Take “Executive Action” Against Second Amendment

on

  • 444 views

New York mayor and noted gun-grabber ...

New York mayor and noted gun-grabber
Michael Bloomberg went on Meet the Press
today and told Obama he should skirt
Congress and the Constitution and take
executive action against firearms owners in
the United States.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
444
Views on SlideShare
444
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    DOUCHEBAG ALERT!!!! Bloomberg Demands Obama Take “Executive Action” Against Second Amendment DOUCHEBAG ALERT!!!! Bloomberg Demands Obama Take “Executive Action” Against Second Amendment Document Transcript

    • DOUCHEBAG ALERT!!!! Bloomberg DemandsObama Take “Executive Action” Against SecondAmendmentKurt NimmoInfowars.comDecember 16, 2012New York mayor and noted gun-grabberMichael Bloomberg went on Meet the Presstoday and told Obama he should skirtCongress and the Constitution and takeexecutive action against firearms owners inthe United States.Bloomberg On Gun Control On Meet ThePress VIDEO BELOWhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TiDYj-qbF04“It’s time for the president, I think, tostand up and lead and tell this countrywhat we should do — not go to Congressand say, ‘What do you guys want to do?’This should be his number one agenda.He’s president of the United States,”Bloomberg said.“What the president can do is number one,through executive action, he can order hisagencies to to enforce the laws more aggressively.”Issuing an executive action, unlike an executive order, does not modify a law. Executive actions, aObama administration office told NBC News in October, concern “regulation, enforcement, statementsof policy… and numerous other things.”Obama, unlike his predecessors, “is not expanding executive power to meet the demands of an externalcrisis. Instead, he is counteracting a new pattern of partisan behavior – nonstop congressionalobstruction – with a new, partisan pattern of his own,” Andrew Romano and Daniel Klaidman wrote forNewsweek prior to the election.White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer told Newsweek Obama will “work with Congresswhere we can – and then be willing to act where they won’t.”Obama imposed a number of unilateral executive actions in his first term, including a move to stopdefending the Defense of Marriage Act in court, implementing greenhouse-gas regulations held up inthe Senate by allowing the EPA to interpret existing law, bypassing the usual confirmation process tomake four recess appointments while the Senate held pro forma sessions to block them, and ignoringCongress and violating the Constitution by sending troops to Libya (see the entire list posted at
    • Breitbart.com).Obama has already used executive action to instruct the ATF to conficate guns. In September, Obama’sJustice Department gave the ARF authority to “seize and administratively forfeit property involved incontrolled-substance abuses.” In other words, the agency now has the power to size firearms frompeople not convicted of a crime or even charged with a crime.In July, as the Fast and Furious scandal unfolded, Obama’s Justice Department devised new rulesrequiring border-state gun dealers to report large purchases of firearms made by individual buyers overshort periods of time.“Limiting the Second Amendment rights of law abiding citizens is not going to solve the problem ofguns being trafficked into Mexico,” said Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), chairman of the House JudiciaryCommittee, following the order. “This rule unfairly punishes citizens in border states who have theright to purchase firearms to protect themselves and their families from dangerous drug traffickers andhuman smugglers.”“Without the approval of Congress, Obama is making gun shops in border states report gun purchasersto the federal government. Obama bypassed Congress and, instead, used the Justice Department tomake this the law of the land,” said Alan Gottlieb, Chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right toKeep and Bear Arms.“The anti-gun rules require gun dealers to report anyone who makes multiple semi-automatic weaponpurchases within five days to the ATF. The gun buyer’s personal information is then put into a massivegovernment list where their gun activity will likely be tracked and monitored for the rest of their lives.18,000 law-abiding Americans will be put on this list every year.”48 hours after the Gabby Giffords shooting, Attorney General Eric Holder sent out a memo almostcompletely ignored by the establishment media. The memo called for more restrictive sentencing of so-called “straw purchasers” who buy weapons and transfer them to someone else (this activity wasencouraged by the government during Operation Fast and Furious).Obama and his gun-grabbing allies in Congress may try to gum up the current background checksystem implemented under the Brady law under the guise of eliminating supposed loopholes. If theycan turn the system into a bureaucratic nightmare, background checks may grind to a halt and fewerfirearm permits will be issued.Currently, 92% of Brady background checks through NICS (National Instant Criminal BackgroundCheck System) are completed while the FBI is still on the phone with the gun dealer. If this system canbe further tied up with red tape and new regulations imposed by executive action or decree, fewerfirearms will be sold by federally licensed dealers, manufacturers and importers.If the above can be implemented and Obama and the Democrats move to outlaw unlicensed privatesellers who are not subject to the Brady Act, then the sale of legal firearms can be reduced to a trickle.The ATF has moved to shut down gun shows. In 2010, the agency issued directions banning privatesales of guns without licenses at gun shows in Texas, despite there being no law to justify suchdemands.
    • Left Now Calling For The Killing Of GunOwners!Infowars.comDecember 16, 2012The control freak parasite left always seeks todisarm the host country. This must be done so thatthe middle class can not stand up to reeducationand slavery. Now the authoritarian collectivist arein a rage that they can’t get our guns and use thehuge homeland Gestapo to rob and kill us. They arenow skipping the old plan of disarming first thenkilling us and saying start the killing of gun ownersnow.Left Now Calling For The Killing Of GunOwners!http://www.youtube.com/watchfeature=player_embedded&v=B9Fojs35sQcINDEED, NUMEROUS PROMINENT VOICESHAVE SPOUTED THEIR DISARMINGRHETORIC:Gun Grabbers Call for Murder of NRAPresident, Supporters in Wake of Mass ShootingBLOOMBERG TO OBAMA: ‘Calling For ‘Meaningful Action’ Is Not Enough’Alex Jones – The Fix Is In: They’re Coming For Our GunsMichael Moore Calls For “Strict Gun Control” After School MassacreMedia Mogul Murdoch Calls for Outlawing “Automatic Weapons”Piers Morgan Wants to Eviscerate the 2nd AmendmentCelebrities Demand Outrageous Gun Laws Following Connecticut ShootingEnemies of Second Amendment Will Exploit Connecticut ShootingGun control petition to White House gets large and immediate support onlineBan Prozac And Other Mass Murder Drugs Not Guns!State Media Stalk CT Victims’ Families for Anti-Gun Quotes
    • The Federal Government is GuiltyAccomplice in School ShootingStewart RhodesOath KeepersDecember 16, 2012This shooting is yet another tragic example of the failed, grotesque insistence on helpless victim zoneswhere any crazed gunman can be assured of a large number of disarmed, undefended, helpless victims,all crammed into one place, where he can kill many children before an armed defender arrives fromelsewhere. It is disturbing and sick that the federal government so hates the right of the Americanpeople to bear arms, and so hates their natural right to self defense, that the government insists onmaking them helpless, disarmed victims for anyone who cares to kill them. And in this case, all of theteachers and staff were willfully disarmed by the Federal Government, by force of law and threat ofprison, to ensure that they would be disarmed and incapable of saving the lives of the children entrustedto their care.That makes the Federal Government complicit in the deaths of these children, and in fact an accessoryto their mass murder, by forcibly disarming (with the very real threat of prison) all the teachers, all thestaff, and any parent who may have been on school property. That stupid law guaranteed the shooterswould meet no immediate armed resistance, which is exactly what is needed to stop such an attack.In such a shooting (as in every criminal attack), seconds count, and the people best positioned to stopthe attack are the people on the scene – the intended victims and/or their care-takers. In this case, thatwould mean the teachers and staff of the school who were responsible for the well-being of thosechildren, and also the parents, who should have the ability to save the lives of their own children asthey take them to and from school.The police cannot, and do not arrive in time to stop such shooters from killing large numbers ofpeople. They are a slow reactive force compared to an armed citizen on the scene. This should becommon sense, as it is obvious that in the immediacy of a criminal attack, it is the intended victims (ortheir immediate care-takers) who are there, in position to put a stop to the attack, if they are capable.And being capable means being armed, trained, willing, and able to use deadly force, right then, rightthere. Anything less leads to what we saw here.But no doubt the rabid anti-gun government supremacists will use this to further their agenda to disarm
    • the American people, totally ignoring thatobvious, plain-as-day truth. Anti-gun nutstrust the government with guns, but not thepeople, and insist that the lowly citizen must bedisarmed and helpless in the face of murderousassault, and must wait on slow respondingarmed government employees, who will not bethere when the attack starts, and most often canonly really clean up the horrendous crime sceneafterwards and maybe, just maybe apprehend ashooter who has chosen not to kill himself (asthey usually do).The bottom line is that these teachers and staffat the Sandy Hook Elementary School wereincapable of keeping these children safe, andincapable of defending them. And one of thebiggest reasons they were so incapable andunprepared to save the lives of the childrenentrusted to their care is because the anti-gun nuts and their fellow travelers in government insistedon disarming every adult in the vicinity, by threatening them with prison time – EXCEPT the gunmen,who don’t care about the law and thus were not disarmed. laws against carrying weapons in schoolsdon’t stop evil men with murderous intent. Such laws only disarm the law abiding and virtuous, whoare now rendered incompetent to defend the precious children in their care.This is disgusting. And yet another reason to home-school. Why would you want to leave yourchildren helpless, in the hands of adults who are themselves helpless, and incapable of defending them,by government decree? For all we know, one of the teachers may have been a veteran, with thetraining and skill to use a firearm if one had been available. But all the teachers and staff, whatevertheir ability with firearms, were stripped of the choice and chance to save the lives of these kids. There are more good guys than bad guys in the world. But the good guys need to be able to stop the bad guys, and that means they need to be armed so they can stop the bad guys on the spot, without having to wait for “official” government approved good guys to respond. Trust the teachers with arms so they can save the lives of their students. Until the adults are allowed to actually act like adults, and defend themselves and their students, this kind of willful killing will continue to happen, and the federal government will in each case be a guilty party to the conspiracy by ensuring that the targets are disarmed.Until this changes, you should refuse to give your children over to government schools lorded over by aFederal Government so callous and indifferent to their safety and lives.
    • Stewart Rhodes,Founder of Oath KeepersUPDATE: President Obama Issues StatementJust hours after yesterday’s tragic mass shooting at aConnecticut Elementary School, President Obamaissued a statement , in which he said this: As a country, we have been through this too many times. Whether it’s an elementary school in Newtown, or a shopping mall in Oregon, or a temple in Wisconsin, or a movie theater in Aurora, or a street corner in Chicago — these neighborhoods are our neighborhoods, and these children are our children. And we’re going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this, regardless of the politics.For once, I agree with something Obama says. I agreewe have been through this too many times, and we aregoing to have to come together and take meaningfulaction to prevent more tragedies like this, regardlessof the politics – by finally, and completely removing restrictions on the ability of teachers and otherschool staff to carry firearms to protect the children in their care. It is clear and obvious that the factthat the teachers were disarmed by force of law was a direct cause of their inability to defend thechildren in their care. The police could not and did not get there in time to protect the kids. The ideathat the teachers should wait for professional “authorized” armed defenders to arrive obviously failed,as it failed at Columbine, and as it failed at Virginia Tech, and as it has failed in every other schoolshooting, from grade schools, to high schools, to colleges. Those were all senseless tragedies ofhelpless victims that were made possible because of illogical politics. We need to set aside politicalagendas and do what is best for the children – arm their teachers and school staff, or at least let themprotect the children if they so choose. After all, we trust these teachers and staff with our kids everyday. Surely we can trust them to also be armed so they can competently defend our kids. So nice tosee Obama finally express a willingness to talk about solutions that will actually work. It is about time.Oh, wait … do you mean to say Obama didn’t meant we should do the obvious, logical thing and armsthe teachers and the staff, who are already vetted, trusted caretakers? You mean to say he is talkingabout the exact opposite - more victim disarmament as the solution? That he STILL doesn’t trust theteachers and staff with guns, and he still wants them to be unarmed, and unable to defend the children?And he wants to pile on even more restrictions on the right of the people to defend themselves? No,say it isn’t so! [Sarcasm off]Obama wasted no time at all in dancing in the blood of innocent victims, as I knew he would (I believeit was David Codrea, over at War on Guns, who coined the term “blood dancers” to describe the victimdisarmament ghouls who use such tragedies to further their agenda. I think it fits splendidly).When Obama says set politics aside and come together to take meaningful action, he means “set asideyour outdated devotion to your right to bear arms, set aside your clinging to your guns, and let’s finallydisarm the American people.” That’s what he means. And that is what his fellow travelers, like NewYork City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Michael Moore, and others of their ilk mean. As always, and as
    • usual, their answer to a mass murder in a“gun free” disarmed victim zone, by anarmed murderer who doesn’t give a crapabout any stupid laws, is MORE victimdisarmament, by means of more laws.In response to a tragedy exacerbated by,and facilitated by a victim disarmamentzone, their answer is to turn all of theUnited States into one huge “gun free”victim disarmament zone, where theaverage, law abiding citizen iscompletely disarmed, and incapable ofdefending themselves, where the onlypeople who will have guns will beoutlaws and the government, leaving thegreat mass of the people defenselesssheep, unable to defend themselves in any meaningful or effective way against private crime – leavingthem disarmed in the face of private robbery, assault, rape, and murder – and also defenseless againstgovernment crime – government robbery, assault, rape, and murder. You know, like England, wherethe strong and young, and those who run in packs, rule the street, and the average citizen is prosecutedfor even trying to defend themselves with a kitchen knife or a screw driver. In England, women are leftvulnerable to rape by larger and stronger males, and the small, frail, weak, and old are all easy prey forthe young, tough and numerous attackers who want to use them as sport or as a resource . A nationof Eloi.That is what Obama and his ilk want to see done here. Well, Molon Labe, Obama. Molon Labe.Easier said than done. There are millions of us who will NOT disarm, no matter what stupid law youmanage to pass, or what Executive Order you pull out of your ass.Frankly, I hope they try it. Maybe that will finally wake up all the sleeping Elmer Fudds out there, andall the sleeping “conservatives” who have hardly said a word at the destruction of the First, Fourth,Fifth, and Sixth Amendments the past dozen years, because they were so scared of al Qaida that theywere willing to sacrifice those vital parts of the Bill of Rights in the name of security. Maybe, justmaybe, they will finally wake the hell up when it is the Second Amendment on the chopping block. Itis sad, but true, that the minds of so many conservatives have been so corrupted and so mangled by theWar on Terror, which is really a war on our Bill of Rights, that the only part of the Bill of Rights theystill really care about is the Second Amendment. If this is what it takes to finally get them angry,alarmed, and up in arms over the destruction of our Republic – to FINALLY get them to stand up to theoath breaking, treasonous politicians in both major parties – then so be it. Let it come. By God, let itcome. Bring it Obama.http://www.infowars.com/