• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Is Radical Orthodoxy Like Jumbo Shrimp

Is Radical Orthodoxy Like Jumbo Shrimp






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 1

http://www.slideshare.net 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Is Radical Orthodoxy Like Jumbo Shrimp Is Radical Orthodoxy Like Jumbo Shrimp Presentation Transcript

    • Is “Radical Orthodoxy” Like “Jumbo Shrimp”? An Introduction The Promise and Perils of Post-Secular Theology
    • A Little Background
      • My introduction to Postmodernity
    • Primary Questions
      • How Radical is Radical Orthodoxy?
      • How Orthodox is Radical Orthodoxy?
      • Is the emphasis on Radical or Orthodoxy ?
      • What are the promises and the perils of Radical Orthodoxy?
    • Radical Orthodox Theologians
      • John Milbank: Theology and Social Theory
      • Catherine Pickstock
      • Graham Ward
      • William Cavanaugh
      • James K. A. Smith
    • What is it?
      • Radically Post-modern
      • Brazenly Theological
      • Unapologetically Confessional
      • Aggressively Social
    • I. Radically Post-Modern “ Weird for the sake of Weird”
    • Pre-Modernity Reason Revelation
    • Modernity Reason Phenomena Noumena
    • The Wrong Turn of Modernity
      • Foundationalist Epistemology
      • Quest for Rational Certainty
      • Loss of participatory ontology
      • Loss of the historical (time)
      • Loss of the catholic (universal)
    • Leads to…
      • Fragmentation of society
      • Breakdown of communication
      • Loss of wonder and beauty
      • Textual nihilism
      • Individualistic narcissism
      • Rejection of dogmatic/confessional theology
      • Results in a “Religion Without Religion” (Derrida)
    • Jean-Francois Lyotard
      • Postmodernism: “incredulity towards
      • Metanarratives”
    • Jacques Derrida
      • There is Nothing Outside the Text!
    • Michel Foucault
      • Power is Knowledge
    • The Primary Culprits: The Rejection of Revelation and the Loss of Participatory Ontology
      • Duns Scotus’ Knowledge by Abstraction versus Augustine’s Knowledge by Illumination
    • Example of the End of Modernity: Pruitt-Igoe Housing Demolition
    • II. Brazenly Theological
      • Post-Secular: All theory (social, political, economic, philosophical) is confessional/theological
      • “ All thought which brackets out God is ultimately nihilistic”
      • Christian theology returns to being the queen of the disciplines
      • Theology must be non-accommodationist
      • Christian theology now offers a discourse able to position and overcome nihilism itself. This is why it is so important to reassert theology as a master discourse; theology, alone, remains the discourse of non-mastery.
      • — John Milbank
    • Recovering Metaphysics
      • Plato
      • Augustine
      • Aquinas
    • III. Rigorously Confessional
      • A new ad fontes: Ressourcement
      • “ Abandoning all scholastic attempts to graft faith onto a universal base of reason [Radical Orthodoxy] instead turns to the church Fathers.”
      • — Milbank
    • IV. Aggressively Social
      • “ Not simply returning in nostalgia to the premodern, it visits sites in which secularism has invested heavily — aesthetics, politics, sex, the body, personhood, visibility, space — and resituates them from a Christian standpoint; that is, in terms of the Trinity, Christology, the Church and the Eucharist.” — Radical Orthodoxy
    • The Church as Polis
      • Augustine’s City of God
      • The church is the only
      • authentic polis, because
      • it eschews individualism
      • “ The church IS a social ethic”
    • The Promise of Radical Orthodoxy
      • Returns theology to public discourse
      • Points out the “confessional” nature of secularism
      • Challenges faith/reason dichotomy
      • Challenges sacred/secular dualism
      • Emphasizes the role of the church in the world
      • Attempts a rigorous confessional Christianity within a pluralist, post-secular context
    • The Perils of Radical Orthodoxy
      • Limits potential for interdisciplinary dialogue(?)
      • Lacks clear criterion for Ressourcement ? (which theologian? Which tradition?)
      • Undermines the constructive promise of contextual theology (voices from the margins)
      • Is it desconstructive enough? Is it reconstructive enough?
      • Metaphysics potentially over-rides biblical and systematic theology
        • Sophia as warning