EDTEC 685 9-11 Commission findings

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    EDTEC 685 9-11 Commission findings - Presentation Transcript

    1. Performance Technology Perspective on the 9-11 Commission Report Information Sharing April Foiles Mike Teaman Patricia Guthrie Wyn Jamison Nicholas Glading Kathleen Borsos-Wooley
    2. Information Sharing: Introduction
      • Information sharing & 9/11
          • What actually happened?
      • Optimal performance of information sharing
          • Where do we need to be?
      • Drivers & barriers to information sharing
          • What are the key factors to get us there?
      • Suggested Solution System
    3. Information Sharing: Actuals
      • What happened?
        • Information which potentially could have prevented 9/11 was not shared and utilized by the appropriate agencies.
          • Including: names of key terrorists, attack plans, and activities.
          • Each agency had a different piece of the puzzle.
          • Critical information could not be accessed by those who could use it.
          • Information was pushed upwards awaiting top level approval and dissemination, only to be bogged down, rather than shared horizontally between agencies where swift action could be taken.
    4. Information Sharing: Actuals
      • Why could information not be shared?
        • Agency databases inadequate
            • Not designed for inter-agency sharing
            • Not designed for analysis of historical data
            • Do not incorporate local agencies
        • Cultures of agencies
            • Cold War cultures required absolute secrecy
            • Agencies collect and analyze information differently
              • CIA - successful predictions
              • FBI - successful convictions
    5. Information Sharing: FBI & CIA (for example) Everywhere EXCEPT the USA United States of America Scope Secrecy is all important. Never reveal sources. Watch criminals. Find specific evidence that they can use in court. Method Predict world events. Convict criminals. Mission Intelligence agency Law enforcement agency What is it? CIA Central Intelligence Agency FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation Agency
    6. Information Sharing: The “Optimal” Occurrence
      • Where do we need to be?
        • Information Sharing
          • Organizations should provide incentives for sharing.
          • Participation from all levels of government under one shared mission.
        • Information Sharing Procedures
          • Information should be processed, reported, and distributed according to a uniform set of high standards.
          • Information should be shared horizontally between agencies.
    7. Information Sharing: The “Optimal” Occurrence
      • Where do we need to be?
        • Leadership
          • President should lead agency information reform.
            • Establishment of the Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC)
          • Sharing and use of information must be directed by practical guidelines.
        • Building Trust
          • Procedures must take into account the people, the nation’s business – and must spend taxpayer money judiciously.
        • Let’s Move Things Along!
    8. Information Sharing: The “Optimal” Occurrence
      • Where do we need to be?
        • Exemplars: Communities of Practice - local, state, & federal agency response teams
          • 2002 Olympics (State of Utah & Pentagon’s Defense Threat Reduction Agency)
          • CATIC (California Anti-Terrorism Information Center) working with Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and NYC Police Department
          • FBI Dallas Office’s Emergency Response Network (800+ public & private agencies)
    9. Information Sharing: Drivers & Barriers
      • What are the key factors that need to be addressed in order to achieve optimal information sharing?
        • Skills/Knowledge
          • Border, screening, and immigration agents don’t know what to look for or what to share .
          • Agencies have different approaches to gathering and using intelligence that are not integrated into a unified effort.
        • Motivation
          • Border, screening, and immigration agents don’t have confidence screening for possible terrorist threats.
          • Agencies don’t value information sharing due to Cold War cultures still present that required absolute security of sources and information.
    10. Information Sharing: Drivers & Barriers
      • What are the key factors that need to be addressed in order to achieve optimal information sharing?
        • Environment
          • No joint mission or agency to manage it.
          • No standardized system or coordinated database in place for information collecting and sharing.
          • No communication system to unify all intelligence gathering sources.
          • Analysis of intelligence scattered amongst agencies with no collaboration of efforts and information.
          • Although civil liberties & privacy rights need to be ensured, s ecurity requirements nurture over classification and excessive compartmentalization of information.
          • No top level leadership to encourage sharing.
    11. Information Sharing: Drivers & Barriers
      • What are the key factors that need to be addressed in order to achieve optimal information sharing?
        • Incentives
          • Agencies have “need to know” cultures, rather than “need to share”
            • Few rewards (& possibly punishment) for information sharing
            • No punishment for not sharing
          • Lack of inter-agency trust with sharing sources and methods.
          • Funding incentives encourage individual agency successes, rather than success of joint mission amongst all agencies.
    12. Information Sharing: Solution System
        • A solution with a common vision…
        • Government restructuring
          • Presidential leadership promoting information sharing
          • National Intelligence Director (NID) to direct and manage international, domestic and defense intelligence agencies
          • Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC)
              • Coordinate national defense against terrorism
              • Ensure horizontal information sharing
              • Maintain and analyze shared information database systemically
          • Joint CIA-FBI anti-terrorism task force
              • Funded and managed as independent agency
    13. Information Sharing: Solution System
        • A solution with a common vision…
        • Knowledge Management System
          • Networked National Community
            • Ground-up NOT Top-down Approach
            • Integrated NOT Stove-piped
            • Horizontal access for all levels of government
          • Robust Information System
            • Redundancy - reduces dependency on any one “arm”
            • Interoperability - flexibility; uses existing systems
            • Open standards - connectivity, consistency
            • Safeguards Civil Liberties
              • Review and permission structure
              • Audit trail of information access
    14. Information Sharing: Solution System
        • A solution with a common vision…
        • Systematic Training & Process Development
          • Scenario and data collection training, including performance support tools, for border, screening, and immigration agents
              • Incorporate mentoring and coaching systems using top performers
              • Online community of practice to maintain learning and optimal performance
          • Feedback systems that promote sharing and discourage withholding
          • Standardized system for gathering, analyzing and sharing information
          • Standardized system for communication amongst local and federal agencies
    15. Information Sharing: 9-11 Commission Resources
      • National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also known as the 9-11 Commission)
      • http://www.9-11commission.gov/
      • The September 11 Digital Archive
      • http://911digitalarchive.org/
      • The Family Steering Committee for the 9-11 Independent Commission
      • http://www.911independentcommission.org/

    + kwooleykwooley, 3 years ago

    custom

    1229 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    EDTEC 685 9-11 Commission findings presentation

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1229
      • 1229 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories