NCOIC Enterprise Cloud Computing - Kevin Jackson

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    NCOIC Enterprise Cloud Computing - Kevin Jackson - Presentation Transcript

    1. Enterprise Cloud Computing Session at the World Summit of Cloud Computing KEVIN JACKSON DIRECTOR, BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
    2. NCOIC-IGT \"Enterprise Cloud Computing“ Session  ~100 registered  ~50 attendees • Merrill Lynch, Ebay, Forrester, 451 Group, IBM, Amazon, Gigaspaces, BMC, Open Group Forum  Initial Topics • Cloud Interoperability • Cloud Standards • Cloud Computing Reference Architecture (i.e. SOA-R) • Forrester “Ultra Modular Computing” • Cloud Computing Service Layers • 2009 Events
    3. www.Grid.org.il The Clouds Space SaaS PaaS IaaS Cloud PC (DaaS) Enterprise External IntraClouds InterClouds Load Balancing of Cost/Performance Cloud Computing: Pay-per-Use for On-Demand Scalability
    4. www.Grid.org.il The Clouds Space High Risk Data Low Risk data General Peak Time R&D Ad-hoc Projects Enterprise External IntraClouds InterClouds Load Balancing of Cost/Performance Cloud Computing: Pay-per-Use for On-Demand Scalability
    5. Ultra Modular Computing • Like Cloud Computing, but deployed within the Enterprise – and with some key differences Applications 'Enterprise Enabling Software Layer(s)' Commodit y hardware infrastructure 5 Entire contents © 2008 Forrester Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
    6. UMC has potential to be hugely disruptive • Possible combination of both Grid and Cloud Computing technologies – but deployed within the Enterprise • Exploits ultra low cost of commodity hardware • Reduces cost to manage by 10x-100x • Provides many of the business advantages of Cloud Computing, but without several of the concerns • Introduces an enterprise-specific asynchronous, transaction-based, dynamic and scalable computing environment 6 Entire contents © 2008 Forrester Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
    7. How UMC will arrive … • All Enterprises encounter ‘core decision events’ -when an opportunity appears which provides the chance to introduce major change • UMC will exploit ‘thin end of the wedge’ adoption; can be introduced gradually • Main downside: most costs are up front in the initial enterprise-specific software environment – but, once done, scalability is there for the taking 7 Entire contents © 2008 Forrester Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
    8. Key UMC decisions • Should the UMC software environment: » only look to the future (new application and development models) » enable existing application and development models, and, possibly, operating systems » both* * This is the most expensive route 8 Entire contents © 2008 Forrester Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
    9. “Standards Body” Approach  Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum  “Unified Cloud Interface” (aka broker)  Implement as XMPP Extension Protocol (XEP)  Address PaaS and IaaS  Collaboration with OASIS, OMG, W3C, and OGF on Cloud Reference Architecture  “Global Socialization” through 2009 events - NCOIC Enterprise Cloud Computing Working Groups - Open Group 2009 Global Enterprise Cloud Computing Conferences - CloudCamp - ASD NII Cloud Computing Conference - World Summit of Cloud Computing  Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) approval  IEEE International Workshop on Cloud Computing
    10. “Adopt Proven Technology” Approach  General Disagreement with “Standards Body” approach  External vs. Internal Cloud Competition • Legacy applications to the cloud o High value for Enterprise CIO o Worst scenario for External cloud providers • External cloud best practices (like EC2) result in Enterprise cloud implementation and management applications and tools • Internal metering vs. External implementation o Lack of metering tools o Lack of consistent metrics o Inability to build Internal vs. External ROI  Cloud Application definition • Entire application in cloud, • Single service in cloud • Mashed-up services in cloud • 3Tera Applogic “Automation Bundle”  Adopt existing Cloud-VM standard • Distributed Management Task Force - Open Virtualization Format (DMTF-OVF) • Reservoir Project
    11. “Customer Driven” Approach  Technology doesn’t set standards. Industry use cases set the standards  Main Cloud Value = Reduced Cost • Solid Cloud ROI model required  Define Interoperability Requirements from Customer Viewpoint • Disaster Recovery o Between Enterprise and External Cloud o Between External Clouds  Customer Driven Standards & Interoperability • Identify industry cloud needs via Web/Email Survey, Interviews, etc. • Build Internal/External Cloud ROI models • Large Industry Customers cooperatively drive cloud vendor standards and interoperability through ability to deliver on Industry organization cloud ROI models
    12. Personal Observation  Three distinct and valuable approaches • Standards Body • Adopt Proven Technology • Customer Driven  Issues • Global agreement on standards could be a long process • “Proven Technology” may mean “Proprietary Technology” • Multiple industry customers could result in industry linked standards for cloud  Hybrid needed (Examples) • Release “Proven Technology” to industry and adopt as basis for open standard • Multiple standards optimized for industry ROI models • “Interoperability Rating “ issued after standards body technical review  NCOIC engagement needed for any approach

    + Kevin JacksonKevin Jackson, 2 years ago

    custom

    1413 views, 1 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Presentation on NCOIC Enterprise Cloud Computing Me more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1413
      • 1394 on SlideShare
      • 19 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 114
    Most viewed embeds
    • 19 views on http://jisi.dreamblog.jp

    more

    All embeds
    • 19 views on http://jisi.dreamblog.jp

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories