Composting of Mixtures of Municipal Solid Waste and Sewage Sludge in Kuwait M.F. Hamoda , Ph.D., P.Eng. Professor of Envir...
Contents <ul><li>Introduction </li></ul><ul><li>Materials and Methods </li></ul><ul><li>Results and Discussion </li></ul><...
Introduction <ul><li>MSW quantities increase by about 5% every year. </li></ul><ul><li>High organic content of MSW (food c...
Composition of MSW in Kuwait  Food 55% 10% Paper 8% 5% Glass 4 % 9%
Materials and Methods <ul><li>Waste Characteristics </li></ul><ul><li>Methods </li></ul><ul><li>In-Vessel Units </li></ul>...
Characteristics of mixed MSW and Sewage Sludge <ul><li>Highly organic ( 75%) </li></ul><ul><li>MSW is mainly food waste (5...
Table 1. Chemical composition of dewatered MSS sample Parameter Mean Value Standard Error of the Mean pH 7.7 0.15 Moisture...
Table 1. Chemical composition of dewatered MSS samples Table 2. Chemical composition of MSW samples   Parameter Mean Value...
Table 3. Characteristics of mixtures of municipal solid wastes and sewage sludges MSW :  MSS  ( Ratio)   Moisture Content ...
In-Vessel Experimental Unit
In-vessel Units <ul><li>Four identical in-vessel units were used. Each  unit was made of a double wall, 364 grade stainles...
In-vessel units <ul><li>The composting vessels were connected to an air compressor through an air flow meter and regulatin...
Windrow Composting Pile
Experimental Set-up Water Cooler Compute r Compresso r Water Pump In-vessel Composting Unit Sludge Temp. Probe Air Vent Ai...
Results and Discussion <ul><li>Process performance was evaluated as follows: </li></ul><ul><li>Reductions in: VS and OC </...
3.1 Reduction in Volatile Solids during Composting of MSW
3.2 Reduction in Volatile Solids during Co-composting of Mixtures of MSW: MSS (2:1)
3.3 Reduction in Volatile Solids during Co-composting of Mixtures of MSW:MSS (4:1)
3.4 Reduction in Organic Carbon during Composting of MSW
3.5 Reduction in Organic Carbon during  Co-composting of Mixtures of MSW:MSS (2:1)
3.6 Reduction in Organic Carbon during  Co-composting of Mixtures of MSW:MSS (4:1)
3.7 Variations in C/N Ratio during Composting of MSW
3.8  Variations in C/N Ratio during Co-composting of  Mixtures of MSW:MSS (2:1)
3.9 Variations in C/N Ratio during Co-composting of Mixtures of MSW:MSS (4:1)
Kinetic Analysis of VS Reduction <ul><li>To waste biodegradability and to measure the loss of organic matter, expressed as...
3.10 Kinetic Analysis  for In-Vessel VS Reduction of MSW at 15  o C
3.11 Kinetic Analysis for In-Vessel VS Reduction of MSW at 45  o C
3.12 Kinetic Analysis for Windrow VS Reduction of MSW at 20  o C
Table 4.  Kinetic rates (k)  for VS reductions during in-vessel composting of MSW  
Conclusions <ul><li>1. Co-composting of mixtures of MSW and MSS at various proportions was more effective than composting ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Dr. Mohammed Hamoda - Composting of Mixtures of Municipal Solid Wastes and Sewage Sludge in Kuwait

1,013 views
826 views

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,013
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
34
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Dr. Mohammed Hamoda - Composting of Mixtures of Municipal Solid Wastes and Sewage Sludge in Kuwait

  1. 1. Composting of Mixtures of Municipal Solid Waste and Sewage Sludge in Kuwait M.F. Hamoda , Ph.D., P.Eng. Professor of Environmental Engineering Kuwait University, Kuwait
  2. 2. Contents <ul><li>Introduction </li></ul><ul><li>Materials and Methods </li></ul><ul><li>Results and Discussion </li></ul><ul><li>Conclusion </li></ul>
  3. 3. Introduction <ul><li>MSW quantities increase by about 5% every year. </li></ul><ul><li>High organic content of MSW (food component about 55%). </li></ul><ul><li>Excessive production of municipal wastewater sludge </li></ul><ul><li>High cost of land and limited suitable sites for landfilling. </li></ul><ul><li>Increased recycling of metals, plastics and glass. </li></ul><ul><li>Potential market for compost to reclaim desert land in the GCC countries. </li></ul>
  4. 4. Composition of MSW in Kuwait Food 55% 10% Paper 8% 5% Glass 4 % 9%
  5. 5. Materials and Methods <ul><li>Waste Characteristics </li></ul><ul><li>Methods </li></ul><ul><li>In-Vessel Units </li></ul><ul><li>Experimental Set-Up </li></ul>
  6. 6. Characteristics of mixed MSW and Sewage Sludge <ul><li>Highly organic ( 75%) </li></ul><ul><li>MSW is mainly food waste (55%) </li></ul><ul><li>Sewage is primarily domestic and sludge is thickened (15 % solids) </li></ul><ul><li>MSW is shredded and screened (particle size : 5mm) </li></ul><ul><li>Moisture content ( M.C.=60%) </li></ul><ul><li>Carbon/Nitrogen ratio (C/N=20) </li></ul>
  7. 7. Table 1. Chemical composition of dewatered MSS sample Parameter Mean Value Standard Error of the Mean pH 7.7 0.15 Moisture Content (%) 54.1 2.24 Organic Matter @ 550 o C (%) 61.5 18.67 Total Organic Carbon (%) 34.2 0.63 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (%) 6.1 0.12 C:N Ratio 5.6 0.15
  8. 8. Table 1. Chemical composition of dewatered MSS samples Table 2. Chemical composition of MSW samples   Parameter Mean Value Standard Error of the Mean pH 7.7 0.15 Moisture Content (%) 54.1 2.24 Organic Matter @ 550 o C (%) 61.5 18.67 Total Organic Carbon (%) 34.2 0.63 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (%) 6.1 0.12 C:N Ratio 5.6 0.15 Parameter Mean Value Standard Error of the Mean pH 5.3 0.23 Moisture Content (%) 61.3 3.95 Organic Matter @ 550 o C (%) 77.93 3.10 Total Organic Carbon (%) 45.2 1.80 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (%) 2.47 0.28 C:N Ratio 18.3 3.09
  9. 9. Table 3. Characteristics of mixtures of municipal solid wastes and sewage sludges MSW : MSS ( Ratio)   Moisture Content (%) C/N (Ratio) Volatile Solids (%) 1:1   54.06 15.25 71.28 2:1 56.78 16.33 72. 35 4:1   58.12 17.36 74.12
  10. 10. In-Vessel Experimental Unit
  11. 11. In-vessel Units <ul><li>Four identical in-vessel units were used. Each unit was made of a double wall, 364 grade stainless steel, cylindrical shape drum and was supported horizontally by 1100 mm height steel frame. The dimensions of each vessel were 600 mm inside diameter, 764 mm outside diameter, and 1000 mm length with capacity of 200 L. Each drum was electrically- driven by a motor and was insulated by a water jacket which was heated with four 1200 watt heating bars, two from each side. Each cylindrical vessel was fully insulated along its circumference with rockwool insulation to minimize heat loss. </li></ul>
  12. 12. In-vessel units <ul><li>The composting vessels were connected to an air compressor through an air flow meter and regulating valve to control the air flow. The air was supplied into the vessel via an air pocket made of 3 mm opening grill in the bottom of the vessel to ensure proper air distribution throughout the vessel and was vented through an outlet 25 mm diameter pipe. The contents of the reactor were mixed by rotating the drum once a day for 15 minutes (6 rotations/minute) and were mixed manually before sample withdrawal. The temperature of the material inside the vessels was continuously monitored by a thermocouple inserted inside the center of the material and was recorded by an on-line computer system. </li></ul>
  13. 13. Windrow Composting Pile
  14. 14. Experimental Set-up Water Cooler Compute r Compresso r Water Pump In-vessel Composting Unit Sludge Temp. Probe Air Vent Air Filter / umidifier Electrical Heaters/Off
  15. 15. Results and Discussion <ul><li>Process performance was evaluated as follows: </li></ul><ul><li>Reductions in: VS and OC </li></ul><ul><li>Other Parameters: pH, C/N </li></ul><ul><li>Kinetic Analysis </li></ul><ul><li>Statistical Analysis </li></ul>
  16. 16. 3.1 Reduction in Volatile Solids during Composting of MSW
  17. 17. 3.2 Reduction in Volatile Solids during Co-composting of Mixtures of MSW: MSS (2:1)
  18. 18. 3.3 Reduction in Volatile Solids during Co-composting of Mixtures of MSW:MSS (4:1)
  19. 19. 3.4 Reduction in Organic Carbon during Composting of MSW
  20. 20. 3.5 Reduction in Organic Carbon during Co-composting of Mixtures of MSW:MSS (2:1)
  21. 21. 3.6 Reduction in Organic Carbon during Co-composting of Mixtures of MSW:MSS (4:1)
  22. 22. 3.7 Variations in C/N Ratio during Composting of MSW
  23. 23. 3.8 Variations in C/N Ratio during Co-composting of Mixtures of MSW:MSS (2:1)
  24. 24. 3.9 Variations in C/N Ratio during Co-composting of Mixtures of MSW:MSS (4:1)
  25. 25. Kinetic Analysis of VS Reduction <ul><li>To waste biodegradability and to measure the loss of organic matter, expressed as volatile solids during composting , it was necessary to determine process kinetics using data obtained in this study under controlled temperature. The plots shown in the following figures and the correlation coefficient (R 2 ) obtained as shown in Table suggest that the degradation of organic matter during MSW composting at the mesophilic temperature range as a function of time follows a first-order kinetics expressed as: </li></ul><ul><li>dC/dt = -kC </li></ul><ul><li>where C is the biodegradable volatile solids at any time, t is the time in days, k is the reaction rate constant (day-1) </li></ul><ul><li>By integrating this equation and letting C = Co at time = 0 gives: </li></ul><ul><li>ln C/ Co = - kt </li></ul>
  26. 26. 3.10 Kinetic Analysis for In-Vessel VS Reduction of MSW at 15 o C
  27. 27. 3.11 Kinetic Analysis for In-Vessel VS Reduction of MSW at 45 o C
  28. 28. 3.12 Kinetic Analysis for Windrow VS Reduction of MSW at 20 o C
  29. 29. Table 4. Kinetic rates (k) for VS reductions during in-vessel composting of MSW  
  30. 30. Conclusions <ul><li>1. Co-composting of mixtures of MSW and MSS at various proportions was more effective than composting of these wastes when treated separately. Reductions of up to 38% of VS were obtained during 30 days of co-composting of MSW and MSS mixtures . </li></ul><ul><li>2. In-vessel composting of wastes at controlled temperatures is more effective than windrow piles where temperatures can not be controlled effectively. </li></ul><ul><li>3. Optimum operating conditions for temperature is 45 o C and for MSW:MSS mixture is 2:1. </li></ul><ul><li>4. A first-order model was suitable to describe the composting process kinetics. </li></ul>

×