Presentation For IAC Federal Acquisition

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Presentation For IAC Federal Acquisition - Presentation Transcript

    1. engage. listen. act. A Network Perspective Federal Acquisition − IAC Executive Series Name Kim Patrick Kobza (Twitter @kpkfusion) Title President and CEO Neighborhood America Date July 1, 2009 All information is proprietary and confidential.
    2. Network Transformation  Networks drive every process within every organization in the world. Moving to a “network information economy”.  Old World View: Value is created in linear processes where there are clear lines of command and control, accountability and authority. “Value chains, supply chains”  New World: Value can also be created by expanding networks beyond linear models, That distributed listening networks can generally add value: create efficiencies, save time and costs. (Customers, partners, employees, citizens). All information is proprietary and confidential. 2
    3. Different Network Experiences Solve Unique Business Problems  All networks are not social. Networks may be built for a purpose and have social characteristics. Different needs require different solutions. Twitter, Facebook, YouTube.  Networks can be experiences, not destinations.  Networks can be complex, where small differences in experience create very large differences in outcome.  Big difference between necessary factors and sufficient conditions to success. All information is proprietary and confidential. 3
    4. Case 1: Discrete Exchange, Department of Defense Defense Acquisition Program Assessment (DAPA) DoD seeks to assess acquisition program and identify areas for cost savings. Taps knowledge of global military leaders for ideas and feedback.  Business Problem: DoD needed to collect large volumes of validated and attributed input from a wide range of stakeholders. [mirrors public comment process]. Key Stakeholders  Department of Defense  Attributes: Independent and  Global military personnel discrete, not anonymous; more  Legislators than opinions, informed based on  Taxpayers benefitting from referential information. reduced spending Lead: Lt. Col Rene Bergeron All information is proprietary and confidential. 4
    5. Results (DAPA) “Those inclusive decisions not Business Results only helped to substantiate the  Urgent need met by speed of SaaS. Public comment site turned on in less than 48 hours team’s recommendations, but  One employee with limited IT skills managed also they helped to increase outreach and incorporated findings into reports confidence in those decisions.  DoD benefitted from shared insight and Becoming part of the process knowledge of military leaders ‘on the ground’ instilled a sense of inclusion  Report and recommendations delivered to Deputy Secretary of Defense on-time and on- and ownership among all those budget involved, including senior leadership.” - Key Project Staff Member Department of Defense All information is proprietary and confidential. 5
    6. Case 2: Social collaboration (concept) All information is proprietary and confidential. 6
    7. Network Aggregation  In a “network information economy” networks can be used to aggregate knowledge, people, and resources across institutional boundaries. Value creation is key.  Have to be thoughtful in using social collaboration. Or:  Too many solution possibilities to be credible.  If audience too broad and anonymous, will lead to lack of trusted environment.  Consider combination of two approaches. All information is proprietary and confidential. 7
    8. Barriers  Disruptive versus Incremental Change. What if it works?  Roles change. Our individual contributions to value change. How we are measured changes. Networks are unpredictable and full of emergent properties.  If we view simply as technology challenge will lead to failure and loss of historic opportunity.  If we approach in a chaotic way, will lead to bad experiences and poor outcomes – loss of credibility, reluctance to accept change. All information is proprietary and confidential. 8
    9. Having a Network Perspective: A different type of change  Having a network perspective is a matter of global competitiveness and national security.  A disruptive change that is being forced on our institutions.  Is an urgent issue with no time to waste.  See Dr. Linton Wells, Dr. Mark Drapeau, Social Software and National Security, an Initial Net Assessment Thank you. @kpkfusion All information is proprietary and confidential. 9

    + kpkobzakpkobza, 4 months ago

    custom

    273 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    This is the slideshow for the Federal Acquisition P more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 273
      • 273 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories