Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
T13 parametric tests
T13 parametric tests
T13 parametric tests
T13 parametric tests
T13 parametric tests
T13 parametric tests
T13 parametric tests
T13 parametric tests
T13 parametric tests
T13 parametric tests
T13 parametric tests
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

T13 parametric tests

878

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
878
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
22
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Parametric TestsBy Rama Krishna Kompella
  • 2. Simpson’s Paradox• Example: 44% of male Male Female applicants are admitted by a university, but only 33% of female applicants Accept 35 20• Does this mean there is unfair discrimination? Refuse 45 40• University investigates entry and breaks down figures for Engineering and English programmes Total 80 60
  • 3. Simpson’s Paradox• No relationship between sex Engineer- Male Female and acceptance for either ing programme – So no evidence of Accept 30 10 discrimination• Why? Refuse 30 10 – More females apply for the entry English programme, but it is Total 60 20 hard to get into – More males applied to English Male Female Engineering, which has a higher acceptance rate than Accept 5 10 English• Must look deeper than single Refuse 15 30 cross-tab to find this out entry Total 20 40
  • 4. Another Example• A study of graduates’ salaries showed negative association between economists’ starting salary and the level of the degree – i.e. PhDs earned less than Masters degree holders, who in turn earned less than those with just a Bachelor’s degree – Why?• The data was split into three employment sectors – Teaching, government and private industry – Each sector showed a positive relationship – Employer type was confounded with degree level
  • 5. Simpson’s Paradox• In each of these examples, the bivariate analysis (cross-tabulation or correlation) gave misleading results• Introducing another variable gave a better understanding of the data – It even reversed the initial conclusions
  • 6. Many Variables• Commonly have many relevant variables in market research surveys – E.g. one not atypical survey had ~2000 variables – Typically researchers pore over many crosstabs – However it can be difficult to make sense of these, and the crosstabs may be misleading• MVA can help summarise the data – E.g. factor analysis and segmentation based on agreement ratings on 20 attitude statements• MVA can also reduce the chance of obtaining spurious results
  • 7. Multivariate Analysis Methods• Two general types of MVA technique – Analysis of dependence • Where one (or more) variables are dependent variables, to be explained or predicted by others – E.g. Multiple regression – Analysis of interdependence • No variables thought of as “dependent” • Look at the relationships among variables, objects or cases – E.g. cluster analysis, factor analysis
  • 8. Multivariate MethodsThe following methods can be seen as direct extensions of 3 basic univariate methods:• Correlational Methods (extending correlation) – Canonical correlation (CC) – Factor Analysis (FA) – Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)• Prediction Methods (extending regression) – Multiple Regression (MR) – Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) – Logistic Regression (LR)• Group Difference Methods (extending ANOVA) – Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) – Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA)
  • 9. Questions?

×