Case Analysis Guide Long Format Mgmt4650 - Presentation Transcript
GUIDELINES FOR LONG-FORM CASE ANALYSIS
MANAGEMENT 4650
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
DR. GARY L. WISHNIEWSKY
Copyright 2007 – All Rights Reserved
GETTING STARTED
READ THE CASE COMPLETELY. DO NOT MAKE NOTES. PUT THE CASE ASIDE. REFLECT ON THE CASE INFORMATION.
READ THE CASE AGAIN AFTER HALF A DAY OR SO. NOW MAKE NOTES. BEGIN WITH THE CASE SITUATION: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHY, HOW.
BEGIN TO SEARCH FOR THE
KEY FACTORS IN THE CASE.
Copyright 2007. Wishniewsky
GUIDELINES FOR CASE ANALYSIS
CONDUCTING FACTOR ANALYSIS IT IS DESIRABLE TO BEGIN BY IDENTIFYING THE SIGNIFICANT FACTORS IN THE CASE FIRST CONDUCTING CASE ANALYSIS IS LIKE BEING A DETECTIVE ONCE THE FACTORS ARE IDENTIFIED IT IS NECESSARY TO ANALYZE THEM TO FIND THEIR IMPORTANCE TO THE CASE Copyright 2007. Wishniewsky
CONDUCTING FACTOR ANALYSIS A GOOD WAY TO ISOLATE THE RELEVANCE OF EACH FACTOR IS TO CONSIDER THAT YOU HAVE ALL THE FACTORS INSIDE A GLASS CUBE YOU SHAKE THE CUBE AND THE FACTORS INSIDE VIGOROUSLY. THEN YOU VIEW THE FACTORS, AND THE CASE, THROUGH ONE OF THE FACES Copyright 2007. Wishniewsky
CONDUCTING FACTOR ANALYSIS AFTER NOTING DOWN VARIOUS FACTORS, YOU REPEAT THE PROCESS AGAIN UNTIL YOU ARE SATISFIED YOU’VE IDENTIFIED ALL FACTORS AND THEIR RELATIVE IMPORTANCE TO THE MAIN THEMES IN CASE NOW YOU ARE READY TO ORGANIZE THE FACTORS ACCORDING TO THEIR ORDER OF IMPORTANCE AND THEN FORMULATE YOUR CENTRAL ISSUE AND RECOMMENDATION Copyright 2007. Wishniewsky
GUIDELINES FOR CASE ANALYSIS
SECTION ONE CENTRAL ISSUE
BRIEFLY STATE THE CENTRAL ISSUE IN THE CASE.
CONDENSE THE ISSUE INTO 5 TO 7 SENTENCES.
THIS MAY ALSO BE CONSIDERED THE "PROBLEM
STATEMENT" OR THE "OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT"
CONSIDER WHERE THE SITUATION
IS NOW, HOW IT DEVELOPED, WHY,
AND WHAT THE NEXT STEP(S) CAN BE.
Copyright 2007. Wishniewsky
WHEN APPLICABLE TO CASE FACTS, THE CENTRAL ISSUE SHOULD BE PROACTIVE AND LOOK TO THE FUTURE.
THE CENTRAL ISSUE SHOULD NOT BE A RESTATEMENT OF WHAT HAPPENED IN THE CASE IN THE PAST.
ASSUME WE HAVE ALL READ THE CASE. IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO RESTATE KEY FACTS.
USE CONCEPTS INSTEAD.
Copyright 2007. Wishniewsky
GUIDELINES FOR CASE ANALYSIS
SECTION TWO
RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION
WHAT ARE YOUR PROPOSED COURSES OF ACTION?
CONDENSE ANALYSIS INTO 6 TO 8 PARAGRAPHS.
WHAT SHOULD THE INDIVIDUAL, COMPANY, ORGANIZATION, GOVERNMENT, OR
SUBJECT OF THE CASE DO NOW?
Copyright 2007. Wishniewsky
THINK OF YOUR RECOMMENDATION AS “HOW TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM,” OR “HOW TO SEIZE THE OPPORTUNITY.”
YOUR RECOMMENDATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE SITUATION AND THE
FACTS PRESENTED IN THE CASE.
INTEGRATE YOUR UNDERSTANDING
OF MANAGEMENT, AND YOUR OWN
PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE.
Copyright 2007. Wishniewsky
GUIDELINES FOR CASE ANALYSIS
SECTION THREE SIGNIFICANT FACTORS
IDENTIFY THE KEY ISSUES IN THE CASE RELEVANT TO THE CENTRAL ISSUE AND TO YOUR RECOMMENDATION.
NUMBER THE SIGNIFICANT FACTORS IN ORDER
OF IMPORTANCE TO YOUR RECOMMENDATION.
YOU MAY BE BRIEF AND WRITE IN EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY FORMAT WITH BULLETS AND PHRASES.
USE STRATEGY AND MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS RATHER THAN SPECIFIC FACTS WHENEVER POSSIBLE.
Copyright 2007. Wishniewsky
GUIDELINES FOR CASE ANALYSIS
SECTION FOUR JUSTIFICATION
THIS IS THE HEART OF THE CASE ANALYSIS.
NOW JUSTIFY YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS.
BRIEFLY DISCUSS THE CENTRAL ISSUE AND
THE RECOMMENDED COURSES OF ACTION.
RELATE THE RELEVANCE AND THE
IMPORTANCE OF THE SIGNIFICANT
FACTORS TO THIS DISCUSSION.
Copyright 2007. Wishniewsky
THIS DISCUSSION MUST BE ANALYTICAL IN NATURE AND NOT REPEAT THE CASE FACTS.
CONVINCE THE READER THAT YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS ARE THE ONLY WAY TO RESOLVE THE CASE SITUATION.
0 comments
Post a comment