• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Fatigue behaviour of reinforced concrete beams with corroded
 

Fatigue behaviour of reinforced concrete beams with corroded

on

  • 2,853 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,853
Views on SlideShare
2,347
Embed Views
506

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
84
Comments
0

4 Embeds 506

http://websinhala.blogspot.com 432
http://www.websinhala.blogspot.com 66
http://websinhala.blogspot.in 6
http://feeds.feedburner.com 2

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Fatigue behaviour of reinforced concrete beams with corroded Fatigue behaviour of reinforced concrete beams with corroded Presentation Transcript

    • FATIGUE BEHAVIOUR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS WITH CORRODED STEEL REINFORCEMENT
      GROUP 11
      Priyadarshani S.T.A. RU/E/2008/139
      Priyanga Y.M.H.S RU/E/2008/140
      Priyankara K.M. RU/E/2008/142
      Rajakaruna R.M.O.B. RU/E/2008/143
      Rananjaya J.A.W. RU/E/2008/144
    • Objective
      Understand the behaviour of reinforced concrete beams with corroded steel reinforcements under high-cycle fatigue loading and the residual mechanical properties of corroded steel reinforcement following fatigue failure of the beam.
      The research was done only for the compressive and tension steel bars (not for stirrups)
    • Materials and specimen details
      3600 mm
      3400 mm
      2T10
      275 mm
      300 mm
      8R @ 150
      150 mm
      2T20
      9 beams (L0 to L8) with one control beam with uncorroded steel was created. All the beams were designed to fail in flexural mode under concentrated mid spam load by providing ample uncorroded vertical shear reinforcement to prevent shear failure
    • Materials and specimen details
      Six 150*150*150 mm cubes were made for each beam to determine the compressive strength of concrete which was used.
    • Accelerated corrosion of steel
      A special electrolytic pool was constructed (5200*4500*120mm).
      After the specimens were placed in the pool, a layer of sand was spread.
      A 4% NaCl solution was sprayed on the sand to retain moisture.
      Negative electrode was connected to copper wire and placed in the wet sand.
      Each beam has a separate DC power supply with a voltage limit of 12V
      Applied corrosion currents were monitored daily using a multimeter with an accuracy of 0.01mA
      Corrosion was estimated using Faraday’s low.
      • ∆m :- Mass loss of steel (g)
      • I :- Corrosion current (A)
      • T :- Time (s)
      • F :- Faraday’s constant (96490 C/mol)
      • Z :- Valence (Fe =2)
      • M :- Atomic mass (Fe = 56 g/mol)
      • Assumption :- The applied current is fully used in the dissolution of iron
      ∆m =(Mit)/(ZF)
    • Materials and specimen details
    • Fatigue and static tests
      Hydraulic fatigue testing machine was used.
      Auxiliary supports at both end of the beams were used to prevent shifting of beams.
      Magnitude of fatigue load was controlled and measured by a load cell.
      Frequency of repeated load was 3.5 Hz
      Applied maximum and minimum fatigue loads are 33 & 7 kN.
      When the number of cycles reached 10,000, 50,000, 100,000, 300,000, 500,000, 1million, and 2million, a static load with a maximum value equal to the maximum fatigue load was applied.
      The deflection at mid span and quarter span of the beams were measured by using 3 displacement transducers.
      The vertical displacements at the 2 pivots of the supports were also measured.
      When the beam did not fail after 2million cycles, the static load was applied to failure.
    • Fatigue and static tests
      load cell.
      Beam
      Auxiliary supports
      displacement transducers
    • Test results and discussions (cracks)
      No cracks were observed in beam L1 & L2
      One of these 2 cracks were observed in other beams,
      Lateral surface of the beam parallel to corroded reinforced steel
      Bottom surface directly under the corroded reinforced steel
      Crack width :- 0.1mm - 0.3mm
    • Test results and discussions (control beam)
      • After 2 million cycles, beam L0 still showed good ductile failure characteristics, and failure load was 71.13kN.
      • The fatigue cycles have no marked effect on the beam’s static performance except for the disappearance of elastic stage due to concrete cracking
      Deflection – load ratio versus fatigue cycle of control beam (L0)
    • Test results and discussions (corroded steel ex: L6)
      • Flexural stiffness of the un corroded and corroded beam decreased during the early loading cycles due to the transverse cracking of concrete beams
      • Stiffness of tested beam was characterized by 3 stages,
      • Decreasing stiffness
      • Stable response
      • Increasing stiffness
      • L0 has the lower flexural stiffness and lower compressive strength in concrete
      • L5 has the higher flexural stiffness and compressive strength than less corroded beam and maximum compressive strength
      • Main factor that influence the mechanical properties of steel
      • Mass loss percentage
      • Fatigue stress magnitude
    • Test results and discussions
      The reduction of steel area due to mass loss under corrosion could result in an increase of fatigue stress in steel reinforcement.
      The maximum upper limit of fatigue stress in steel reinforcement could reach 220 Mpa
      More the mass loss percentage of steel reinforcement the less the fatigue life of the beam.
      Corrosion substantially reduces the fatigue life of the beam.
    • After the failure of beams under fatigue loading
      The main tensile reinforcements were carefully removed.
      Cleaned with a brass bristle brush to remove all adhering mortar.
      Cleaned with an acid solution
      Residual rust products were removed again by using a bristle brush.
      The reference weight of a steel bar per unit length was measured using noncorroded bars.
      The mass loss percentage of corroded steel reinforcement was obtained.
      Cut each steel bar in 5 parts (a,b,c,d,e) and did static material test to find out fatigue damage for each section.
      When the corroded steel reinforcements were removed, severe corrosion pits at the location of fracture of steel reinforcement was observed
      Result shows that the critical section of corroded RC beam under fatigue load is at the maximum bending moment region & at the location of most severe corrosion pits in the steel reinforcement
    • Static testing of corroded steel bars after fatigue cycles
      Maximum fatigue strength of L0
      Ratio of mechanical properties of corroded steel to original steel after fatigue loading
    • Test results and discussions
      The increase of fatigue stress in steel bars did not significantly change the tensile strength of steel.
      But decrease the ultimate tensile strain.
      Yield strength of steel was reduced from 389MPa to 305Mpa due to the effect of corrosion & fatigue.
      Yield strength of corroded steel reinforcement decreased linearly with the mass loss percentage of decrease.
      Fatigue stress induces several cumulative damage in corroded steel reinforcement.
      The effect of steel reinforcement corrosion on structural performance should have a significant consideration during the durability design of RC structures