Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Voip from kishor ramani
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Voip from kishor ramani

38
views

Published on

this is use to know how voip is used …

this is use to know how voip is used

Published in: Technology, Business

1 Comment
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • this is best for knowing the voip solution
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
38
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
1
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Wireless & VoIP Kishor ramani july 25, 2013
  • 2. Wireless Voice over IP: 2 Questions • Can we make it work? – Can we provide decent quality? – Can we support efficient signaling? • Can the telcos accept it? – Loose control of voice? – Loose control on “services” ?
  • 3. Interactive voice quality, Component #1: delay 0 200 400 600
  • 4. Components of delay • Network (delay, jitter): – Access Network, Uplink – Core Network, – Access Network, Downlink • Packetization, De-Packetization • Device: – Acquisition, Echo control, Compression, – Jitter, Decompression, Playback
  • 5. Managing the Uplink: beware of contention • Data Usage emphasizes “load” – Highly variable sources, – Contention access fits best (CSMA, TDMA- DA, slot request, etc.) • Contention access unfit for voice – Generates “large deviation” – Deviation => jitter => delay. • … Unless very low load factor
  • 6. Packetization frequency: Size => Delay => Quality 0 200 400 600 value 5 10 20 30 40 60
  • 7. Bandwidth => Quality Delay => Header/Payload ratio 0 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 128
  • 8. Voice Quality: Effects of Packet Losses • Loss effect aggravated by “fractal” distribution. • Moderate losses (1%) can be concealed. • Higher losses require redundancy: (standard in RTP): – Affects bandwidth (split / N packets) – affects delay (N packets) => quality…
  • 9. Uplink Starvation => Control Bandwidth, Packet Rate Edge Router, Radio Signaling: •Voice Call ? •Quality ? Network Control Authorize Core Network
  • 10. Can we do efficient signaling? Wireless VoIP => Mobility • Classic telephony approach: – HLR (home) /VLR (visitor) – Based on phone number – Number = Transport + User identity. • VoIP separates network, service – Network: IP address – Service: DNS name, e-mail, URL • Need clean architecture
  • 11. The VoIP Protocol Soup More than one choice… • H.323 – ITU standard, implementations – Complex, heavy, hard to evolve • MGCP – Client server, “telephony device” – Used in Cable networks – Not really adequate for mobility support – MGCP / Megaco / H.248 debacle • SIP – Clean end-to-end architecture
  • 12. Signaling & Mobility: Combine “Mobile IP”, SIP SIP agent Correspondent DHCP Register InviteDHCP DHCP Register Invite #2
  • 13. Can the telcos accept VoIP? Wireless VoIP? • Special price for voice, data: – Wire line: price of voice is 10 x data bit – Wireless: data is “special service.” • Bundling of services: – Caller-ID, Call-Waiting, – Voice Mail, – 3000 “IN” services – 911, etc.
  • 14. Wireless VoIP: loosing control of voice? • In the short term, QoS issues – Contention on the uplink, – Telco can control “voice quality IP”, – But “real time” is more than voice (video, games, monitoring.) • The end of uplink starvation? – High speed wireless LAN, 3GIP? – Need adequate “sharing” procedure.
  • 15. Wireless VoIP: becoming “the” infrastructure • Need to be always on, meet the classic 99.999% requirement, • Deal with societal issues, such as wiretap, in an end-to-end environment, • Provide 911 like services: – Special signaling, no hang-up, – Location services, route to local 911, – “Emergency” level for QoS.
  • 16. Wireless VoIP: loosing control of services • IP signaling is end to end – SIP agent “outside” the network, – Service independent of transport. • State is kept in the device: – Local implementation of services, – Call waiting, multiparty call in device. • Empower users, unleash creativity
  • 17. Wireless VoIP Roadmap • Solve the uplink issue: – QoS on “first hop”, not end-to-end, – Independent of payload type (voice, etc.) – Security, authorization (DHCP, QoS). • Encourage competition: – “Secure Wireless DHCP,” Roaming • Concentrate signaling work on SIP: – Forget the ITU!