Data-Driven “Rigor” Meeting the Needs of Staff and Students
Where We Are Where We Are Going
2008, AYP was finally met!
2009 Objectives:
By June 2010:
RFL will meet or exceed the AYP target of 65%
Biology HSA scores will increase by 40%.
Number of students who take and pass HSAs will increase by 20%
Drive Staff Development
Measure Rank
Know Performance Standards
Evaluate School Sc h ool wide evaluation on the national level
Identify Staff(ing) Needs
Maximize Staff Involvement
Drive Instruction
Evaluate departments and/or grade levels on the local level
Quarterly benchmarks and reflective reports
Utilize the Big Picture
Meet the needs of “failing” students.
Use data to gather information about their career interest and pathway of choice.
Supporting Student Achievement
Qualify instruction with student need
Identify individual goals on the local and national level.
Equip all students with the ability to “self-learn” devices / tutorials
Applying Data
Promote Professional staff development
Celebrate Accomplishments
Revisit goals, objectives and vision.
Sources
State of Maryland. “2008 Maryland Report Card.” [Online] 2008. http://www.mdreportcard.org
Red Schoolhouse Software (OARS). “Benchmark Summaries: Test II” [Online Image] 24 March 2008. https://bcps.oarsaccess.net/bcps/_reports/ia/standard_analysis.php?ig=&final=1
A tiered process toward improving test scores works more
A tiered process toward improving test scores works best for most schools. See how one English teacher at Reginald F. Lewis has used national standards, state standards, school standards, classroom standards, then finally individual standards to help scores increase by 40 percent. less
0 comments
Post a comment