The Auditorium Suspended Cieling Has No Siesmic Bracing
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

The Auditorium Suspended Cieling Has No Siesmic Bracing

on

  • 806 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
806
Views on SlideShare
547
Embed Views
259

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

1 Embed 259

http://saveccnz.wordpress.com 259

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

The Auditorium Suspended Cieling Has No Siesmic Bracing The Auditorium Suspended Cieling Has No Siesmic Bracing Presentation Transcript

  • From the 54 page demolition permit application
  • Labor Missionaries followed the plans • Increasing evidence that the labor missionaries and their supervisors followed the plans will: • Continue to unravel the various layers of deception and misinformation • Provide Church auditors with a clearer view of methods and motives. • Dispel the many enabling myths that have perpetuated this fraud over 15 years. • Require Beca to reciprocate with plan details and pictures or retract • Warrants a call to the CEO of Beca to voluntarily come forward and make things right.
  • What of the plan details? • The 10 seismic claims do not reference any related plan details or pictures • They are not specific to any particular location • These unsubstantiated seismic assumptions have cast a wide net over the David O McKay Building, the Temple and the Fosters Road chapel • They have become the basis of all past, present and future decisions
  • Integrity • These seismic claims are a summary of all of the reports over a 15 year time span. • They are broad and sweeping with little to no plan details and pictures. • The mounting evidence will expose the guilty parties to the light of day • The seismic claims are not tied to any code issues. • Statements such as “the walls are not connected to the foundations or the columns” are statements of assumed fact. • Our evidence turns these facts to fiction