| An Interview with Robert Fisk |  Insider Knowledge:  An Interview  with Robert Fisk Robert Fisk of the London Independen...
| An Interview with Robert Fisk |know you’ll get support from the White House, from a Republicanpresident like Mr. George ...
| An Interview with Robert Fisk |                                                 “The problem is that, really, the UN is ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

084 6 1_insider_knowledge_robert_fisk

74

Published on

Published in: News & Politics
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
74
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

084 6 1_insider_knowledge_robert_fisk

  1. 1. | An Interview with Robert Fisk | Insider Knowledge: An Interview with Robert Fisk Robert Fisk of the London Independent.K nown for his extensive originally provoked this battle, by firing missiles into Israel. And coverage of the Middle “I think that’s how the war actually began. East crisis, the London the Israelis Now the real issue is: Were the Israelis at some point going toIndependents’ foreign attack the Hezbollah anyway? Did the Hezbollah realise the reactioncorrespondent Robert Fisk speaks tell the that the Israelis would have? In other words the mass bombardmentexclusively to SIGNAL magazine Americans of infrastructure and people across Southern Lebanon. Sayyedabout Lebanon, Israel and the Hassan, once the head of Hezbollah, said; “If we had knownreputation of Irish peace-keeping what 1% what Israel would do, we would never have committed this operation.” I don’t believe that. The Hezbollah knew very well whattroops. By David Coffey. they’re the Israelis would do. Immediately after I heard of the capture of the going to two soldiers and the killing of the three others, I was on the road from Beirut to Southern Lebanon. Now if I knew what the IsraelisCould you explain how last year’s open do and were going to do, don’t tell me Hezbollah did not.”conflict in the Lebanon originated?“On the morning of July 12 Hezbollah tell themembers crossed the Lebanon/Israeli Americans Is there a possibility that the attack on Hezbollah wasborder. They captured two Israeli soldiers premeditated? There are some sources that say Israel hadand killed three others. In the subsequent that they consulted the US government about such an attack months priorfighting, an Israeli tank was driven over theborder and got blown up by a mine - it may expect to the beginning of the violence. Had Israel gone to Washington for permission to attack Hezbollah?have been an old mine, we don’t know - and their “I don’t think that Israel asked for permission. I think the Israelis tellfive more soldiers were killed. According tothe best sources in Lebanon, the Israelis support.” the Americans what they’re going to do and tell the Americans that they expect their support. You don’t ask permission for anything ofstarted firing mortar rounds into Lebanon Washington if you’re Israel. You do what you want to do and you’lland the Hezbollah then retaliated, having62 | | Summer ‘07 |
  2. 2. | An Interview with Robert Fisk |know you’ll get support from the White House, from a Republicanpresident like Mr. George W Bush. What we do know is that there “Over two decades, there is no doubtare articles in the Israeli press suggesting that there was goingto be a future battle with the Hezbollah. And of course all armies, that many hundreds of Lebaneseincluding the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF), will have plans for are alive because Irish troops riskedscenarios that may or may never happen, but if there was a plan, asthe conspiracy theories have it, for Israel to attack Lebanon, I think their lives, and sometimes gave theirthey didn’t know much what to do when they got attacked by the lives, as peace-keepers of SouthernHezbollah because their campaign against the Hezbollah was a totalfailure in both military and political terms. While that doesn’t mean Lebanon.”that Hezbollah won the war, it certainly means the Israelis lost thewar.”Do you think the US might have been serving their own interestsby delaying the cease-fire process?Of course they were. What the United States wants to do is frightenIran by allowing Hezbollah to be destroyed by Israel. But theAmerican administration is self-delusional. It thought it was goingto find weapons of mass destruction, capture Iraq, take over Iraq,and make it a democracy, the same with Afghanistan. It hasn’thappened. It’s complete delusion. The opposite has happened. Itwas extraordinary after being in Southern Lebanon under Israeli air and does not have to take weapons fromattack and watching all this, for me to hear Bush say: “Israel won” Hezbollah. Hezbollah says it will not give up- even the Israelis don’t think they won! And he said Hezbollah have its weapons. The Lebanese government hasbeen defeated which is clearly not true. The Bush administration no power to force it to do so. There will beobviously believed that, prior to any kind of further pressures on no disarming of Hezbollah, absolutely not.Iran, the destruction of the Iranian ‘lung’ in Lebanon, if you want todescribe the Hezbollah rather accurately, would teach Iran a lesson,but they didn’t destroy the ‘lung.’ And Iran’s lesson was - we won.” The Irish Defence forces have committed 150 troops to the current peacekeeping mission. Could you summarise theThe current peace keeping mission in Lebanon is set at a chapter contribution that Irish troops have made6 mandate. In past conflicts of similar hostility we have seen a to peacekeeping missions in Lebanon overchapter 7 mandate implemented. Is a chapter 6 mandate robust the years and in this current conflict?enough to handle the current situation? Over two decades, there is no doubt thatThe problem with the UNIFIL force is that it is now a NATO force and many hundreds of Lebanese are alivewe’ve had NATO forces before. And in one form or another, western because Irish troops risked their lives,forces, whether they be NATO, Canadian, British, American, special and sometimes gave their lives, as peace-forces, infantry groups, helicopter groups, are now in Kazakhstan, keepers of Southern Lebanon. However,Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Turkey, Egypt, Algeria, back then they were participating in a forceBahrain, Yemen, Saudi Arabia and Iraq of course, we are spread which clearly was agreed by both sides andabout thirty-two times more thickly across the Muslim world than the which was not intended to be a buffer zoneoriginal crusaders were in the twelfth century. If UNIFIL has become for Hezbollah or for South Lebanon, or fora NATO force it will be attacked. Al-Qaeda have already threatened Israel. Now they have taken a political side,it, it hasn’t been threatened by Hezbollah, but in the end I expect UNIFIL - I don’t mean “they” the “Irish” - IUNIFIL will ask Hezbollah for protection. It will be attacked by Sunni mean UNIFIL is now on one side, they’re onMuslim groups. I have been to families in Lebanon whose sons have the side of the protection of Israel for thegone off and committed suicide attacks on the Americans in Iraq. security council of the UN, i.e. the UnitedThe same families are not going to sit in their homes and watch States. It’s called a buffer force but it’sanother NATO force be set up in Lebanon. inside Lebanon so it’s protecting Israel.What are the objectives of the UN force in Lebanon now, in your Any force that wants to do that becomesopinion? politically liable. I do not know the decision-It is a pro-American, pro-Israeli force. It is constantly called a buffer making behind the sending of 150 Irishforce. Buffer against what? Buffer for whom? It is not there to troops back to UNIFIL. There is no doubtprotect the Lebanese, and the Lebanese know that. If it was there that there is enormous good will not just into protect both sides, Israel and Lebanon, then the buffer would South Lebanon but in other Arab countriesbe deployed on both sides of the border. But it’s not on the Israeli towards Ireland because of it’s extremelyside, it’s in Lebanon. UNIFIL is there to protect the Israelis from courageous peacekeeping troops. I’veHezbollah and Lebanon. driven with them under fire, I’ve been with them under fire, I’ve crouched in ditches with them under fire and I can tell you theySo will we see a disarmament of Hezbollah in the coming months? are first class soldiers. But the despatch of 150 troops to a NATO lead force is a veryNo, of course not. General Pellegrini, the UNIFIL commander told me serious matter.personally three weeks ago, that under the mandate he has no right | Summer ‘07 | | 63
  3. 3. | An Interview with Robert Fisk | “The problem is that, really, the UN is the only hopeDo you think the European Union could bedoing more to provide global security and of bringing back some justice to the Middle East,diffuse international hostilities? f lawed and corrupt though it is.”Well we saw the European Union (EU) atwork in Bosnia and it didn’t work. There isno EU foreign policy and there is certainlyno EU policy on the Middle East. It has the hope of bringing back some justice to the Middle East, flawed andeconomic power to do enormous things but corrupt though it is. You have to ally with that, the fact the Unitedthey don’t have the political will and that’s States wishes the UN not to be a peace-keeper but to be irrelevant.the problem. And the United States doesn’t The former US ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, his job was towant it to have the political will. The United make sure it remains irrelevant - but useful, when it’s necessary.States wants to keep the EU politically andmilitary weak. I mean they’re happy to have The new UN Secretary General is just another colourless bureaucratthem as allies in a place like Basra and and he’ll do what he’s told by the United States via the securityAfghanistan but that’s not the same thing council - he won’t get a second term if he doesn’t.at all.The successor of Kofi Annan as UNSecretary General was announced today.Do you think we will see significantchanges in the UN, as an organisation,with the introduction of Mr Ban Ki-moon? Above: Beirut in theNo, nothing at all. This is a totally unknown aftermath of an Israeliman taking over from a very weak man. The air campaign lastproblem is that, really, the UN is the only summer.64 | | Summer ‘07 |

×