OMB E-300 BY08 Travel Management System


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

OMB E-300 BY08 Travel Management System

  1. 1. Travel Management System (TMS) Exhibit 300: Part I: Summary Information and Justification (All Capital Assets) Overview Date of Submission: Agency: Department of Education Bureau: Office of the Chief Financial Officer Name of this Capital Asset: Travel Management System (TMS) Unique Project (Investment) 018-14-01-01-01-1050-00 Identifier: (For IT investment only, see section 53. For all other, use agency ID system.) What kind of investment will this Mixed Life Cycle be in FY2008? (Please NOTE: Investments moving to O&M ONLY in FY2008, with Planning/Acquisition activities prior to FY2008 should not select O&M. These investments should indicate their current status.) What was the first budget year FY2005 this investment was submitted to OMB? Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency performance gap: eTS supports the PMA on expanded e-government. The eTS solution provides a web-based end-to-end integrated solution to ED travelers that will enable travel documentation to be completed and processed in a more efficient manner. The solution also supports EFT payments through split disbursement capablity. Split disbursement capability allows a traveler to designate a portion of their reimbursement to be sent directly to the Government-contracted travel card vendor and the remainder to the employees' personal account. With the implementation of split disbursement, the Department can realize a benefit with fewer defaulted credit cards because payments are made directly to the vendor, rather than through the traveler first. The
  2. 2. integrated solution includes interfaces between ED's financial system and the eTS system to provide more timely transmissions and accuracy of automated (secured) data. Another advantage of the eTS solution is the integrated On-Line Booking engine (OBE). The OBE is integrated into the solution to allow travelers the flexibility of logging into one system creating the authorization and clicking a button to allow them to make common carrier, hotel and rental car reservations within the same application. This will allow travelers more efficient and effective travel document processing. Did the Agency's Yes Executive/Investment Committee approve this request? a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval? Did the Project Manager review Yes this Exhibit? Has the agency developed and/or No promoted cost effective, energy efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project. a. Will this investment include No electronic assets (including computers)? b. Is this investment for new No construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only) 1. If "yes," is an ESPC or UESC being used to help fund this investment? 2. If "yes," will this investment meet sustainable design principles? 3. If "yes," is it designed to be 30% more energy efficient than relevant code? Does this investment support one Yes of the PMA initiatives? If "yes," check all that apply: Expanded E-Government
  3. 3. a. Briefly describe how this Goal 4: Expand Electronic asset directly supports the Government - eTS supports the identified initiative(s)? PMA by contributing to the fulfillment of internal efficiency and effectiveness to improve the performance and reduce costs of Federal Government administration by using best practices. eTS is a fully integrated end-to-end solution which is web accessible and provides full automated workflow. Does this investment support a No program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)? (For more information about the PART, visit a. If "yes," does this investment No address a weakness found during the PART review? b. If "yes," what is the name of the PART program assessed by OMB's Program Assessment Rating Tool? c. If "yes," what PART rating did it receive? Is this investment for information Yes technology? If the answer to Question: "Is this investment for information technology?" was "Yes," complete this sub-section. If the answer is "No," do not answer this sub-section. For information technology investments only: What is the level of the IT Level 2 Project? (per CIO Council PM Guidance) What project management (2) Project manager qualifications does the Project qualification is under review for Manager have? (per CIO Council this investment PM Guidance): Is this investment identified as Yes
  4. 4. "high risk" on the Q4 - FY 2006 agency high risk report (per OMB's "high risk" memo)? Is this a financial management Yes system? a. If "yes," does this investment No address a FFMIA compliance area? 1. If "yes," which compliance area: 2. If "no," what does it Compliance with Federal address? financial managemetn systems. requirements (Joint Financial Management Improvement Program functional requirements. b. If "yes," please identify the system name(s) and system acronym(s) as reported in the most recent financial systems inventory update required by Circular A-11 section 52 What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2008 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%) Hardware 0 Software 0.050000 Services 0.800000 Other 0.150000 If this project produces No information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities? Are the records produced by this No investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval? Summary of Funding
  5. 5. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated "Government FTE Cost," and should be excluded from the amounts shown for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." The total estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report. Table 1: SUMMARY OF SPENDING FOR PROJECT PHASES (REPORTED IN MILLIONS) (Estimates for BY+1 and beyond are for planning purposes only and do not represent budget decisions) PY - 1 BY + BY + BY + BY + 4 PY CY BY and 1 2 3 and Total 2006 2007 2008 Earlier 2009 2010 2011 Beyond Planning Budgetary 0 0 0 0 Resources Acquisition Budgetary 1.2437 1.35 0.17 0.225 Resources Subtotal Planning & Acquisition Budgetary 1.2437 1.35 0.17 0.225 Resources Operations & Maintenance Budgetary 1.729 0.54 0.703 0.769 Resources TOTAL Budgetary 2.9727 1.89 0.873 0.994 Resources Government FTE Costs Budgetary 1.556 0.457 0.47 0.493 Resources Number of 0 4.10 4.10 4.10 FTE
  6. 6. represented by Costs: Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner agencies). Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented. Will this project require the No agency to hire additional FTE's? a. If "yes," How many and in what year? If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2007 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes: N/A Performance Information In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency's mission and strategic goals, and performance measures must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative or qualitative measure. Agencies must use Table 1 below for reporting performance goals and measures for all non-IT investments and for existing IT investments that were initiated prior to FY 2005. The table can be extended to include measures for years beyond FY 2006. Performance Information Table 1:
  7. 7. Fiscal Strategic Performance Actual/baseline Planned Performance Year Goal(s) Measure (from Previous Performance Metric Supported Year) Metric Results (Target) (Actual) 2004 See table 2 NA NA NA NA All new IT investments initiated for FY 2005 and beyond must use Table 2 and are required to use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Please use Table 2 and the PRM to identify the performance information pertaining to this major IT investment. Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding "Measurement Area" and "Measurement Grouping" identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for at least four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at Performance Information Table 2: Measurement Measurement Measurement Measurement Baseline Planned Actual R Area Category Grouping Indicator Improvement to the Baseline Customer Service Quality Accuracy of Custom Three custom Provide one Two custo Results Service or Reconciliation reports in the additional reports we Product Reports TMS reconciliation moved to Delivered application. report for users production to easily access 03. To ass for with reconciliation reconciliat purposes. issues add users wer issued ‘Repor IDs to ass offices wit reconciliat accounts. Mission and Financial Accounting Interface 26 interfaces Improve the 9 Interfac Business Management Failures failures per interface failures. P Results year. failures to 18 logs produ per year. alerted sy administra and issues
  8. 8. resolved i cases. Processes and Productivity Efficiency Travel Travel Improve Document Activities and Efficiency documentation Document document processing processing processing processing in reduced to takes from TMS to 3-4 days with 7-10 days days additional training p on the sys and the ea use of the system. Technology Reliability and Availability System 20 system Reduce system Scheduled Availability Downtime reboots due reboots due to weekly re to hung reduced th “hungâ€u application to amount o application 14 reboots to less durin period. Customer Service Quality Accuracy of Custom Three custom Provide one As of 9/30 Results Service or Reconciliation reports in the additional no planne Product Reports TMS reconciliation enhancem Delivered application report for users the curren to easily access due to for anticipate reconciliation migration purposes Mission and Financial Accounting Interface 26 interfaces Improve the As of 9/30 Business Management Failures failures per interface no interfa Results year. failures to 18 failures ha per year. resulted in document processing general le Processes and Productivity Efficiency Travel Travel Reduce As of 9/30 Activities and Efficiency Document Document document reimburse Processing processing processing in continue t takes from TMS to 3-4 the 2-4 da 7-10 days days. reimburse timeframe Technology Reliability and Availability System 20 system Reduce system As of 9/30 Availability Downtime reboots due reboots due to five re-bo
  9. 9. to ‘hung' hung have been application. application to required d 14. hung appl Weekly re are still performed part of ED maintenan Customer Service Quality Accuracy of Help Desk 50% End- 75% End-User As of 09/3 Results Service or Support User Traveler Traveler Issues 99% of En Product Issues resolved within issues ref Delivered Resolved one hour by EDCAP within one Desk were hour resolved successfu Customer Service Quality Accuracy of Reduced Travel 50% adoption 70% usage of As of 6/30 Results Service or Ticket rate of on-line on-line booking ED 77% O Product Transactions booking engine usage. ED Delivered Fees engine the highes adoption r OBE usag across the vendor CW Mission and Financial Accounting Interface 26 interfaces Less than 18 As of 6/30 Business Management Failures failures per per year. interface Results year failures. D has been processing regularly General L Processes and Productivity Efficiency Travel 7-10 days Reduce to 2-3 As of 6/30 Activities and Efficiency Document Processing days. 2-3 day Processing Time processing occurs wit integrated system. Technology Reliability and Availability System 20 system Reduce to 14. As of 6/30 Availability Downtime reboots due TMS syste to hung reboots ha application been repo Customer Service Quality Accuracy of Help Desk 50% End- 75% End-User As of 12/3 Results Service or Support User Traveler Traveler Issues 99% of en
  10. 10. Product Issues resolved within travel issu Delivered Resolved one hour were reso within one with the E hour Help Desk that could resolved b Desk Staf Functiona were refer the vendo Help Desk resolution Customer Service Quality Accuracy of Reduced Travel 50% adoption 70% usage of As of 12/3 Results Service or Ticket rate of on-line on-line booking 70% usag Product Transactions booking engine on-line bo Delivered Fees engine by ED sta secure tra reservatio Mission and Financial Accounting Interface 26 interfaces Less than 18 As of 12/3 Business Management Failures failures per per year. 6 interfac Results year failures ha resulted. Resolution failure we addressed resolved w 24 hours outlined in SLAs. Processes and Productivity Efficiency Travel Travel Reduce As of 12/3 Activities and Efficiency document document processing to travel files processing processing 2-3 days. processed takes 3-4 and paym days. were mad within 24 of success processing Technology Reliability and Availability System 20 system Reduce to 14. As of 12/3 Availability Downtime reboots due no system to hung reboots w application requested to the ven System
  11. 11. availabilit monitored GSA. Sche maintenan performed required. Customer Service Quality Accuracy of Help Desk 50% End- 75% End-User Results Ex Results Service or Support User Traveler Traveler Issues December Product Issues resolved within Delivered Resolved one hour within one hour Customer Service Quality Accuracy of Reduced Travel 50% adoption 70% usage of Results Ex Results Service or Ticket rate of on-line on-line booking December Product Transactions booking engine Delivered Fees engine Mission and Financial Accounting Interface 26 interfaces Less than 18 Results Ex Business Management Failures failures per per year. December Results year Processes and Productivity Efficiency Travel Travel Reduce Results Ex Activities and Efficiency document document processing to December processing processing 2-3 days. takes 3-4 days. Technology Reliability and Availability System 20 system Reduce to 14. Results Ex Availability Downtime reboots due December to hung application Enterprise Architecture (EA) In order to successfully address this area of the business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the investment is included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and Investment Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case demonstrates the relationship between the investment and the business, performance, data, services, application, and technology layers of the agency's EA. 1. Is this investment included in your agency's target Yes
  12. 12. enterprise architecture? a. If "no," please explain why? 2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Yes Strategy? a. If "yes," provide the investment name as identified in TMS the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment. b. If "no," please explain why? 3. Service Reference Model (SRM) Table: Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to nent Agency Service FEA SRM FEA SRM FEA Service FEA Service Inte Component Domain Service Type Component Component Component o Description Reused Name Reused UPI Exte Reu Archiving data from legacy travel system for Back Office Data Loading and No R future queries Services Management Archiving involving travel transactions. Maintenance, modification, Development and Back Office and Data Integration No R enhancement of Services Integration the E2 interface with FMSS Application and Development integration Back Office Instrumentation and No R testing of E2 Services and Testing Integration application Information Back Office Development Instrumentation Instrumentation 018-24-02-0 Inte Technology Services and and Testing and Testing 0-01-1020-0
  13. 13. Infrastructure Services provided by the Integration 0 DoED EdNet Investment. Operation and maintence of the Back Office Financial Expense nance travel No R Services Management Management management application Fees for processing employee Back Office Financial Expense Fees No R vouchers in lieu Services Management Management of software licensing fees Training staff on Back Office Human Education / new E2 travel No R Services Resources Training system Operation and maintence of the Back Office Human Travel nance travel No R Services Resources Management management application Incentives paid to contactor for Back Office Human Travel superior travel No R Services Resources Management application performance Establish a Back Office Human Travel Travel 023-10-01-0 Exte common Services Resources Management Management 3-01-0220-2 governmentwide 4 web-based end- to-end travel management service that reduces or eliminates capital investment and minimizes total cost per
  14. 14. transaction for the gov't with policy based on best travel management practices. Operation and maintence of the Business nance travel Analytical Reporting Ad Hoc No R management Services application Operation and maintence of the Business Standardized / nance travel Analytical Reporting No R Canned management Services application Information Technology Infrastructure Business 018-24-02-0 Organizational Network Network Services Management 0-01-1020-0 Inte Management Management Management provided by the Services 0 DoED EdNet Investment. Operation and maintence of the Customer Customer nance travel Initiated Online Tutorials No R Services management Assistance application Operation and maintence of the Digital Asset Document nance travel Classification No R Services Management management application Operation and maintence of the Document Digital Asset Document nance travel Review and No R Services Management management Approval application nance Operation and Process Routing and Inbound No R maintence of the Automation Scheduling Correspondence travel Services Management management
  15. 15. application Software needed Process to support the Tracking and Case Automation No R security of the Workflow Management Services E2 system. Operation and maintence of the Process Tracking and Process nance travel Automation No R Workflow Tracking management Services application Information Technology Infrastructure 018-24-02-0 Support Security Services Cryptography Cryptography 0-01-1020-0 Inte Services Management provided by the 0 DoED EdNet Investment. Information Technology Infrastructure 018-24-02-0 Support Security Intrusion Intrusion Services 0-01-1020-0 Inte Services Management Detection Detection provided by the 0 DoED EdNet Investment Use existing SRM Components or identify as "NEW". A "NEW" component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM. A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission. 'Internal' reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. 'External' reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government. Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding
  16. 16. amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service. 4. Technical Reference Model (TRM) Table: To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment. FEA SRM FEA TRM FEA TRM FEA TRM Service Component Service Area Service Service Specification (i.e. Category Standard vendor or product name) Microsoft Visual Travel Component Business Platform Basic provided by Management Framework Logic Dependent ISS Travel Component Data Database Oracle SQL Net Management Framework Management Connectivity provided by EDNET Oracle Runtime;Cognos Travel Component Data Reporting and Impromptu;Cognos Management Framework Management Analysis Query provided by ISS Microsoft Internet Travel Component Presentation / Static Display Information Services Management Framework Interface provided by EDNET Certificates / Travel Component Security Digital TBD Management Framework Signatures Supporting Travel Component Security Security Provided by ISS Management Framework Services Service Authentication Travel Service Access and / Single Sign- TBD Management Requirements Delivery on Service Travel Service Internal provided by Access and Hosting Management Requirements EDNET Delivery Travel Service Service Legislative / Federal Travel Management Access and Requirements Compliance Regulations;Section
  17. 17. Delivery 508 Service Travel Service Service Access and Provided by EDNET Management Transport Transport Delivery Service Supporting Travel Service Access and Network Provided by EDNET Management Transport Delivery Services Service Oracle PL SQL and Expense Interface and Integration Middleware Net 8 provided by Management Integration ISS Service Travel Database / Platform and Database Oracle provided ISS Management Storage Infrastructure Service Travel Database / IBM SAN provided Platform and Storage Management Storage by ISS Infrastructure Service Microsoft Internet Travel Delivery Application Platform and Information Services Management Servers Servers Infrastructure provided by EDNET Service Travel Delivery Platform and Web Servers Progress 9.1C Management Servers Infrastructure Service Travel Hardware / Servers / Compaq ProLiant Platform and Management Infrastructure Computers provided by ISS Infrastructure Service Travel Software Rational Rose Platform and Modeling Management Engineering provided by ISS Infrastructure Rational Enterprise Service Software Travel Software Suite and Rational Platform and Configuration Management Engineering Clearcase provided Infrastructure Management by ISS Service Mercury Interactive Travel Software Test Platform and Load Runner Management Engineering Management Infrastructure provided by ISS Microsoft Windows Service Travel Support Platform provided by Platform and Management Platforms Dependent EDNET;IBM-AIX Infrastructure provided by ISS Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA
  18. 18. SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate. 5. Will the application leverage Yes existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)? a. If "yes," please describe. ED will use a enterprise-wide e-Gov travel solution as required by the Federal Travel Regulations. The tailored task order was issued under GSA's Master Contract. 6. Does this investment provide Yes the public with access to a government automated information system? a. If "yes," does customer Yes access require specific software (e.g., a specific web browser version)? 1. If "yes," provide the E2 Solutions, Version 3.7.2. specific product name(s) and Enterprise-wide deployment on version number(s) of the October 2, 2006. required software and the date when the public will be able to access this investment by any software (i.e. to ensure equitable and timely access of government information and services). Exhibit 300: Part II: Planning, Acquisition and Performance Information Alternatives Analysis
  19. 19. Part II should be completed only for investments identified as "Planning" or "Full Acquisition," or "Mixed Life-Cycle" investments in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above. In selecting the best capital asset, you should identify and consider at least three viable alternatives, in addition to the current baseline, i.e., the status quo. Use OMB Circular A- 94 for all investments, and the Clinger Cohen Act of 1996 for IT investments, to determine the criteria you should use in your Benefit/Cost Analysis. 1. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this Yes project? a. If "yes," provide the date the analysis was 6/10/2006 completed? b. If "no," what is the anticipated date this analysis will be completed? c. If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why: 2. Alternative Analysis Results: Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table: Send Alternative Description of Risk Risk to Analyzed Alternative Adjusted Adjusted OMB Lifecycle Lifecycle Costs Benefits estimate estimate True 1 Maintain contractor support at current level. Continue contractor baseline support through eTS lifecycle. This alternative would also utilize the on-board ED expertise to successfully manage the eTS solution. This solution relies on the contractor labor and provides the highest
  20. 20. degree of expertise for maintaining the hosted software end-to-end solution. Government takes over baseline support for the complete eTS solution. Benefits would be similar to Alternative 1 but costs would be greater due to the increase in government employees needed to take over eTS True 2 maintenance tasks. In addition, this risk is greater under this alternative due to current staffing constraints and the the timeline associated with the hiring of additional qualified ED staff would severely impact the system. Do not migrate to the eTS solution. This would be the greatest risk and put the Department in non- compliance with the Federal Travel Regulations True 3 and the PMA initiatives. This would prove to be the most economical solution but not viable due to the mandates associated with the eTS migration. False 4 Eliminate ED travel system and enter into a cross- servicing agreement with another agency. We would enter into an agreement with another agency to handle our travel management functionality.
  21. 21. This may not offer the degree of functionality we currently enjoy. It also might not be as integrated with the rest of EDCAPS requiring manual system updates. 3. Which alternative was selected by the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee and why was it chosen? Alternative One was selected and was derived by the Federal Travel Regulations whereas each Federal civilian agency must migrate to a eTS solution no later than September 30, 2006. The Department received a waiver of the migration date to extend to October 2, 2006 due to the implementation of a new FMSS system. If a waiver would not have been granted a significant amount of funding would have been required to integrate the solution with the legacy and new FMSS systems. 4. What specific qualitative benefits will be realized? With the migration to the eTS solution, the Department will be in compliance with the FTR provisions. Risk Management You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life- cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle. 1. Does the investment have a Yes Risk Management Plan? a. If "yes," what is the date of 1/30/2006 the plan? b. Has the Risk Management No Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB? c. If "yes," describe any significant changes: 2. If there currently is no plan,
  22. 22. will a plan be developed? a. If "yes," what is the planned completion date? b. If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks? 3. Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule: The Task Order issued is a performance based contract. Risks identified and mitigation strategies identified are outlined in the Service Level Agreement. Cost and Schedule Performance 1. Does the earned value No management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard-748? 2. Answer the following questions about current cumulative cost and schedule performance. The numbers reported below should reflect current actual information. (Per OMB requirements Cost/Schedule Performance information should include both Government and Contractor Costs): a. What is the Planned Value 5250.300000 (PV)? b. What is the Earned Value 5101.260000 (EV)? c. What is the actual cost of 5753.622000 work performed (AC)? d. What costs are included in Contractor and Government the reported Cost/Schedule Performance information (Government Only/Contractor Only/Both)? e. "As of" date: 12/31/2006 3. What is the calculated Schedule 0.973000 Performance Index (SPI= EV/PV)? 4. What is the schedule variance -163.305000
  23. 23. (SV = EV-PV)? 5. What is the calculated Cost 1.031000 Performance Index (CPI = EV/AC)? 6. What is the cost variance 175.724000 (CV=EV-AC)? 7. Is the CV% or SV% greater No than +/- 10%? (CV%= CV/EV x 100; SV%= SV/PV x 100) a. If "yes," was it the? b. If "yes," explain the variance: c. If "yes," what corrective actions are being taken? 8. Have any significant changes No been made to the baseline during the past fiscal year? 8. If "yes," when was it approved No by OMB?