Management Process Is Key
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Management Process Is Key

on

  • 634 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
634
Views on SlideShare
634
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • What is the typical planning horizon in today’s environment? What does control being under monitoring imply? Control depends on monitoring. Budgeted versus actual. Deviations may present an opportunity. For example, a long standing struggle with a competitor you may reduce prices, more advertising to gain market share or increased outreach for a lobbying effort to get legislation changed.
  • How much information is lost when frequency of measurement is reduced. Peaks is sales can be precisely seen with more frequency. A related question. Who provides this data? What incentive do they have to have to collect and provide it? Why would they NOT want to gather more frequently? How often then? Related to how current which is related to how much and how accurate?

Management Process Is Key Management Process Is Key Presentation Transcript

  • Management Process Is Key
    • Management Process: How It Impacts the Organization
    • Best Practice of IT Strategy Driven by Management Process
    • - Pepsi-Cola Case Example
    • 3. Where to Position the Analytical System
    • 4. The Critical Success Factors Approach
    • - GE Power Systems Case Example
    • 5. The Balanced Scorecard
    • 6. Market-Driven Performance Measurement
    • - Dannon Yogurt Case Example
    • 7. Planning vs. Control Systems
    • 8. Expert Systems: Potential for Automating Processes
    • - OceanSpray Case Example: Extracting News from Data
    • 9. Automated Decision Technologies: The New Frontier
    • - DeepGreen Financial Case Example
  • Linking Strategy to Operations - A Closed-Loop Management System Stage 1 Develop the Strategy Stage 2 Translate the Strategy Into Specific Objectives And Initiatives of a Strategic Plan
    • Stage 3
    • Plan Operations
    • Map out the Operational
    • Plans and resources to
    • achieve objectives
    Stage 4 Execute the Strategy & Operational Plans Stage 5 Monitor & Learn Stage 6 Reassess the Strategy And Update it Source: R.S. Kaplan & D.P. Norton, “Mastering the Management System,” HBR, Jan. 2008, p.65
  • Management Process Organization Structure and the Corporate Culture Individuals and Roles The Organization’s Strategy Technology MANAGEMENT PROCESSES: Planning, Control, Rewards EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT: Social, Economic, Political EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT: Technological Competitors Customers - The Glue that Holds the Organization Together Adapted from M.S. Scott Morton & J.F. Rockart, “Implications of Changes in IT for Corporate Strategy,” Interfaces , Jan-Feb, 1984
  • Management Processes That Merit Examination
    • Planning and Budgeting
    • Performance Measurement and Reporting
    • Resource Allocation
    • Human Resource Management
    LESSON: Investments in providing good quality information are a waste if managers do not use the system. Hence, improve the management process first and then develop the information system to support the improved management process.
  • PEPSI-COLA CASE EXAMPLE
    • The Bottler has to be well-managed for the Pepsi-Cola Company to prosper.
    PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Sell "Concentrate" PEPSI BOTTLERS Convert "Concentrate" into Products CONSUMERS Bottles & Cans - Stores Fountain Syrup - Restaurants Vending
  • Focus on the Management Process Identify the Revenue Drivers and Cost Drivers of the Bottler's operations. Develop the Management Process or " how-to " procedures for managing these drivers. An Information System to implement the "how-to" procedures.
  • PEPSI - COLA'S Thinking in 1982
    • All Bottlers face essentially the same problems with regard to improving their operating efficiency and profitability.
    • Why should each Bottler reinvent the wheel?
    • Pepsi-Cola Company will make the investment in developing an information system that can be used by all Bottlers.
    • The PC will enable a "standard" software package to be developed for the Bottler Information System.
  • A Comprehensive Information System to Support the Management Process Developed over a three-year period: Phase I: Sales Analysis & Tank/Cylinder Monitoring Phase II: Equipment Tracking & Service Analysis Phase III: Financial Analysis
  • Information Provided by the System - Some Examples
    • How are My Route Drivers Performing?
    • What is the Average Drop Size for Each Route?
    • Are the Trucks being Overloaded?
    • What is the Sales Trend in Different Channels for Pepsi-Free?
    • Where are My Tanks?
    • How Many Pieces of Equipment are on Loan?
    • What is the Productivity of My Mechanics?
    • Which Makes of Equipment are Less Dependable?
  • Where to Position the Analytical System ? Initial Target of Most BI Systems: - Corporate Financial Data Why? - Area of great interest for top management - Data readily available - Easy to implement Is a Corporate Financial BI Really “Useful” ?
  • A Corporate Financial BI System Is “Useful” IF...
    • It has Micro-Level Data
      • e.g. Expenditures at the Detail Level
      • Data on Individual Debtors by Ageing Period
    • BI System can then Trace Problems to the Root Causes
  • The CSF Approach What Is It? A method to determine the information requirements to improve management effectiveness. Why? Existing MIS systems are “data-rich but information-poor” - too much financial data - unfiltered data - irrelevant operational data - no external environment data We need information about what really counts; just because data is available doesn’t mean it’s important.
  • Critical Success Factors are ... The key areas where “things must go right” for the business to flourish They should receive constant and careful attention from management - Determine the Key Indicators Measure the performance of each indicator - Determine the data needed for each indicator IDENTIFY MUST - DOs  FOCUS BI ON MUST - KNOWs
  • The Critical Success Factors Approach Identify the specific factors most responsible for the organization to achieve its goals Determine the KPIs for monitoring each CSF Define the data requirements for measuring each KPI Develop prototype system. Modify prototype based on user feedback
  • Goals vs. CSFs For For-Profits
    • Earnings per share
    • Return on investment
    • Market share
    • New product success
    • Automotive Industry
      • Styling
      • Quality dealer system
      • Cost control
      • Meeting energy standards
    • Supermarket Industry
      • Product mix
      • Inventory
      • Sales promotion
      • Price
    GOALS CSFs
  • Measures for Tracking CSFs -- An Example
  • Merits of the CSF Approach 1. Focuses on what management absolutely needs to do and know -- not those which would be merely nice to do and know 2. Sets priorities in the Information Systems Plan 3. Limits data collection to what is necessary 4. Avoids the trap of building systems on data which is readily available or easy to collect 5. Forces consideration of external and soft data 6. Highlights the need for change in information systems in response to environmental and business changes
  • GE Power Systems: Focus BI on “MUST - DOs” Changing Business Focus: from new machine to replacement parts market from U.S. to international more price sensitive Improve "Customer Service" Increase Productivity Reduce Costs
  • What Are the “MUST - KNOWs” ? New Data on "DATES" Quote Performance Shipment Performance
  • Data On “Dates” Needed For BI
    • · "QUOTE CYCLE" FROM:
      • - Date of request for quote
      • - Date of quote release
    • · "REQUESTED CYCLE" FROM:
      • - Date of order
      • - Customer "want" date
    • · "SHIP CYCLE" FROM:
      • - Date of order
      • - Date of shipment
    Tracking Cycle Times: Important For Changing Organization Culture From Technology-driven to Market-driven
  • Traditional Performance Measurement Systems Are Inadequate...
    • Each function has its own set of “results measures”. For example:
      • Marketing - Market Share
      • Operations - Inventory
      • Finance - Costs
    • These narrow functional measures could
    • lead to overall system Suboptimization.
    • The few cross-functional results measures are financial:
      • Revenues, Gross Margins, Operating Income,
      • Return on Investment, etc.
      • Report on what happened last period without indicating
      • how managers can improve performance on the next
    • What is Needed: Process Measures
      • To monitor activities throughout the organization
      • that produce a given result.
  • The Balanced Scorecard
    • Translates a company’s strategic objectives into a coherent set of performance measures with four different perspectives:
      • Customer
      • Financial
      • Internal Business Processes
      • Innovation and Learning
    • A limited number of critical indicators should be selected within each perspective - about 15 to 20.
    • Real benefit: Scorecard is the core of the management system - the way the business is run.
  • Rockwater’s Balanced Scorecard Financial Perspective Customer Perspective Internal Business Perspective Innovation & Learning Perspective Return-on-Capital Employed Cash Flow Project Profitability Profit Forecast Reliability Sales Backlog Pricing Index, Tier II Customers Customer Ranking Survey Customer Satisfaction Index Market Share Business Segment, Tier I Customers, Key Accounts Hours with Customers on New Work Tender Success Rate Rework Safety Incident Index Project Performance Index Project Closeout Cycle % Revenue from New Services Rate of Improvement Index Staff Attitude Survey # of Employee Suggestions Revenue per Employee
  • Market-based Performance Measures... MUST be linked to Reward Systems Measurement and reward systems are critical in developing a market-oriented business. Just as managers will emphasize those things that top management’s statements of beliefs and values focus their attention on, they will also do those things for which they are evaluated and rewarded Source : F. Webster, “Rediscovering the Marketing Concept,” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper, 1988.
  • The Dannon Yogurt Case Example
    • Critical Success Factor: Customer Service
    • Key Performance Indicators :
      • For Each Customer
      • Fill Ratio of Each SKU = Shipments  Orders
      • Freshness of Product of Each SKU = Shelf-Life of Shipments
    • New Data Requirements:
      • Fill Ratio of the SKU: Orders for that SKU from Customer
      • Freshness of Product of SKU: Code Dates on Containers of SKU Shipped to Customer
      • (Available Shelf-Life = Code Date minus Ship Date)
    • Result : The legacy Invoicing System, which only had data on
    • Shipments, had to be replaced with a new system that
    • captured the additional data needed for management control.
  • A Market-Driven Performance Measurement System
    • Customer Service became the metric in Dannon for measuring performance of: Marketing Sales Distribution AND Production
    • Uniform Performance Measurement is critical for integrating the important functional areas in the business process.
  • The Management Cycle Establish Objectives Formulate Plan Implement Plan Monitor Performance Control the Implementation, React to Deviations between Plan and Actual Revise Objectives Replan
  • Management Process: Planning and Control
    • Plan
        • Deciding “Today” what to do “Tomorrow”
        • The Planning Horizon: Strategic Planning may be Years Budgeting may be a Year Production may be Weeks
      • Implement
        • Get Organizational Buy-in
        • Restructure Organization if necessary
      • Monitor
        • Measuring Actual Performance is Critical for Control
      • Control
        • How has Actual Performance deviated from Plan?
        • What corrective action must we take?
          • Deviations may also represent an opportunity
  • A BI TO SUPPORT PLANNING IS NOT EASY TO DESIGN
    • (1) Large number of available alternatives
    •    how to determine the "best" plan
    • (2) Uncertainty about the outcomes
    •   how to evaluate the consequences
    • (3) Multiple criteria for measuring outcomes
    •   how to combine "apples" and "oranges"
  • "SATISFICING" vs. "OPTIMIZING" IN DECISION-MAKING
    • Search for the best solution using an optimizing model
    • Problems: Model may not fit the problem
    • More data needed
    • More time and cost
    • Higher intellectual cost
    Choose a solution that is good enough using manager's rules of thumb or heuristics. Benefits: Saves time and cost Easy to implement versus
  • MONITORING PERFORMANCE
    • (1) WHAT ?
    •  What "readings" of actual performance should be
    • taken?
    • (2) HOW ?
    •  Where should the "meters" for taking the readings be placed?
    • (3) HOW OFTEN ?
    •  How often should the "meters" be read?
    • (4) HOW CURRENT ?
    •  How quickly should the "readings" be transmitted to management?
    • (5) HOW ACCURATE ?
    •  How accurate do the "readings" have to be?
  • MONITORING THE MARKET
    • What ?
    • Sales: Volume? Value?
    • Shares: Total Market? Segments?
    • How ?
    • Internal data
    • Market research
    • Call reports of sales force
  • MONITORING THE MARKET
    • How Often ?
    • Daily? Weekly? Monthly?
    • How Timely ?
    • Enough advance warning to steer around the iceberg
    • How Accurate ?
    • Satisficing versus Numerical accuracy
  • Aggregating Data Evens out Market Fluctuations BUT… must be balanced with burden of collecting data
  • REQUIREMENTS OF A BI TO SUPPORT CONTROL
    • (1) Summary reports not useful
    •   they can hide problems
    • (2) Exception reports
    •   a "must" for reducing data overloads
    • (3) Drill - down capability to access detailed data
    •   to trace a problem to the root cause
    • (4) Graphics capability
    •   facilitates comparisons
    • (5) "What happened" is not enough
    •   analysis needed for " what if "
    • (6) Intelligent drill-down
    •   to signal problems at a detail level
  • “ WHAT IF” ANALYSIS - An Example
    • Standard Sales Performance Report
      • Actual vs. Target vs. Last Period
      • Variances
      • % Achievement of Target
    • What are the implications of performance to-date?
    • THE Question : Will Annual Targets be achieved?
    • Compare Current Sales Speed with
    • Balance-To-Achieve Sales Speed
    • BTA Speed = BTA Target / Balance # of Months
  • Standard vs. “What If” Sales Reports Fiscal Year: April-March Standard Year-to-Date Sales Report for December 77% 390 300 Totals 111% 90 100 P3 56% 180 100 P2 83% 120 100 P1 % of Target Target Actual Product 210% (39%) 320% 50% Change 6.67 46.67 16.67 BTA Speed 33.33 11.11 11.11 11.11 Current Speed “ What If” Sales Report for December 210 510 300 Totals 20 120 100 P3 140 240 100 P2 50 150 100 P1 BTA Annual Target Actual Product
  • What are Expert Systems?
    • A technology that enables expertise to be distributed in a firm without the presence of the human expert
    • Rule-Based System
      • If “This”, Then “That”
      • Rules are determined from expert knowledge and programmed in the software
      • Feedback Loop to Improve Rules
    • An HR Application
    • Screening a large number of resumes for relatively low-level positions with well-defined and precise skill requirements
    • - e.g., Call Center Agents
    • Expert System can weed out applicants who do not meet the requirements
  • Using Expert Systems: Extract News from Scanner Data
    • The Promise: Better Data
      • Compared to Retail Store Audits
      • Frequency: Weekly vs. Bimonthly
      • Level of Detail: UPCs vs. Brands
      • Scope: Top 50 Markets vs. Regions
    • The Problem: Too Much Data
      • At least 100 times more data
    • The Result: Impossible to Use Quality Data
  • "CoverStory"- An Expert System Replaced The Human Analyst
    • Before . . .
    •  Companies circulated top-line reports, including tables and charts from the retail store audit data. An analyst prepared the cover memo highlighting important news in the data.
    • Now. . .
    • Not feasible to have an army of analysts to sift through the mountain of scanner data. Instead, "CoverStory" automatically writes this memo !
      • A model-imbedded expert system extracts the news from the data
      • Another expert system composes the memo using a built-in thesaurus to eliminate repetitious wording
  • Case Example: Ocean Spray Cranberries
    • A $1 billion grower-owned agricultural cooperative
    • Lean IS staff
    • Only one marketing professional for analyzing the scanner data
    • Scanner data for juices is imposing
        • -- 400 M numbers covering up to 100 data measures, 10,000 products, 125 weeks and 50 geographic markets
        • -- Grows by 10 million new numbers every four weeks
  • Impact of CoverStory
    • Enables a department of one to alert all Ocean Spray marketing and sales managers to key problems and opportunities and provide problem-solving information
    • Being done across 4 business units handling scores of company products in dozens of markets representing hundreds of millions of dollars of sales
    • System is totally integrated into business operations because it delivers information of competitive value in running the business
  • Automated Decision Technologies… … Are Coming of Age!
    • Best suited for decisions that must be made frequently and rapidly
    • Information for making decisions is available electronically
    • Knowledge and decision criteria must be highly structured
    • Good Example: Bank credit decisions
    • … Repetitive, Uniform Criteria; Plentiful Customer Credit Data Available
    • Poor Choice : Whom to Hire as CEO
    • … Rare Occurrence, Non-Standard Criteria (e.g., personal chemistry) that cannot be captured in a computer model
    • Benefits:
    • … More Consistent Decisions
    • … Respond Faster to Customers
    • … Leverage Scarce Expertise
    • … Reduce Labor Costs
    • … Enforce Policies
  • Case Example: DeepGreen Financial Competitive Advantage – Automated Credit Decisions
    • Targeted Customers: High-end Borrowers
    • - Want a standardized loan for a small fraction of the value of their home
    • Created an Internet-based system in 2000
      • Customer completes home-equity loan application online in 5 minutes
      • Receives decision within 2 minutes in 80% cases
    • No upfront paperwork from borrowers
    • - Traditional appraisal of credit worthiness not required
    • USP: Speed, Service and Convenience
    • - NOT Interest Rates
    • - Can tailor loan terms to needs of individual borrowers
    • Skimming off customers with the best credit
    • 8 Employees process 400 applications a day
    • 5 years: Originated over $4.4B of home-equity lines of credit
  • Automated Credit Decision Process Loan Approved? (2 mins) Joan’s Credit Report pulled out from Online Database - Joan’s Credit Score is calculated by system Joan’s Property Evaluation - Based on Online Data System selects a Notary Public near to Joan’s home Joan chooses Closing Date Loan documents printed from system - express-mailed to the Notary Notary visits Joan’s home to get signatures on loan documents End YES NO Joan applies online for loan ( 5 mins.) Checks for Fraud & Flood Insurance
  • DeepGreen’s Shrewd Strategy Feasible Because …
    • … All data needed to make home-equity loan decisions available online
    • … Relatively easy to make credit decisions involving affluent, low-risk borrowers
    • - Factors to be considered are well understood
    • - Experts can readily codify the decision rules
    • … High-end customers tend to be Internet-savvy
    • - Offer them what they need online, and they will come
  • Lessons Learned
    • Identify Revenue Drivers and Cost Drivers with Significant Bottom-Line Impact – the “MUST DOs”
    • Examine the Current Management Process for Managing These Drivers - Improve the Process - Develop Detailed “HOW-TO” Procedures
    • Determine the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Each Driver
    • Measure the KPIs - “Satisficing” Information is Enough - But, Macro Information is Useless - Micro Information Needed to Pinpoint Root Causes to Enable Corrective Action - “DE-AVERAGE”
    • Reward System Must Be Aligned to KPIs
  • What Is Not The Solution 1. Give Users Access to the Data - They will Drown in All That Data 2. System has Everything - An Overdesigned System: NOT Usable 3. “Build It and They Will Come” - Users need Help “ What to Do with the Information”?
  • What Is The Solution - Some Pointers 1. A Rich Data Base - Business Problems Cannot be Solved in the Aggregate - Detailed Data Needed from Different Sources to Trace Problems/Opportunities to the Root Causes - Soft Data Vital in Marketing & HR 2. “Data” must be Converted into “Actionable” Information - System Design Must Enable Users to Glean the “News” in the Data 3. A Compact System - Ability to Drill Down to Detailed Data Where Needed 4. Problem-Finding Capabilities Built into the System - Ranking, Exception Reports, Trend Graphs 5. System Must be Inviting to Use