By: Lowell S. Kabnick, MD, FACS
Visit VeinGlobal at http://www.veinglobal.com/ for more presentations and videos on this topic, or for more information on venous disease news, education and research.
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?
Does Multiple Axial Vein Incompetence Increase The Clinical Severity of Venous Disease?
1. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Lowell S. Kabnick, MD, FACS
Does Multiple Axial Vein
Incompetence Increase
The Clinical Severity Of
Venous Disease?
2. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Disclosure
.
I do not have any potential conflict of
interest
3. Patterns of saphenous reflux in
women with primary veins
590 limbs(326 women) C2 class
Reflux 80%
GSV and SSV 17%
GSV 60%
SSV 20%
Nonsaphenous 20%
Englehorn; JVS 2005;41-645-51
4. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
LOWELL S. KABNICK, MD
HAMZA RANA, MD
Clinical Severity and Number of
Superficial Axial Veins with Reflux in
Each Lower Extremeity
5. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Study Aim:
To evaluate the association between clinical
severity of primary varicose veins and
number of superficial axial veins with
reflux for each leg
6. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Study Design
•Single Center, Retrospective
•Patients:
•>18 yr- seen at NYU Langone Medical Center Vein
Center -November 2012 and February 2013 with baseline
data available for CEAP clinical class, VCSS, and
Venous DUS.
•Excluded were:
•Patients <18 year of age
•History of previous lower extremity superficial venous
intervention
•Deep venous thrombosis.
7. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Predictor Variable:
•Clinical classification of CEAP
•Revised Venous Clinical Severity Score
Outcome Variable:
•Number of axial superficial veins with reflux on
venous duplex ultrasound
•Duration of reflux > 0.5 seconds
•GSV, SSV, AASV, PASV saphenous vein,
intersaphenous vein (Vein of Giacomini), and cranial
extension of small saphenous vein
•Relevant Covariates:
•Age, sex, BMI, number of pregnancies
13. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
CEAP Category & Superficial
Refluxing Veins
Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for
CEAP Categories <0.0001
There is a trend towards multiple superficial veins with
worsening CEAP class with P value of <.0001
14. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Correlation Between Number Of
Refluxing Superficial Axial Veins And
Clinical Variables
Variable Number of Superficial
Veins with Reflux r Value
P Value
VCSS 0.43 0.01
CEAP 0.56 0.01
Age -0.04 0.56
BMI 0.09 0.23
Pearson and Spearman Coefficient (r values) Correlation
>0.5 strong
0.3-0.5 moderate
15. Univariate Logistic Regression Analysis
Variable Multiple Superficial
Axial Veins (≥2)
Odds Ratio
95% CI OR P Value
CEAP Category
CEAP C 0-2
CEAP C 3-6
0.09 0.01 0.72 0.02
11.11
VCSS 1.11 1.00 1.23 .06
Gender
Female 0.54 0.18 1.61 0.27
Age 0.99 0.96 1.03 0.81
BMI 1.03 0.95 1.12 0.40
16. Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis
Variable Multiple Superficial
Axial Veins(≥2)
Odds Ratio
95% CI OR P Value
CEAP Category
CEAP C 0-2
CEAP C 3-6
0.10 0.01 0.88 0.03
10
VCSS 1.04 0.90 1.20 0.56
Female Vs Male 1.24 0.28 5.55 0.77
Pregnancy ≤2 Vs > 2 0.99 0.22 4.48 0.97
Age 0.99 0.95 1.03 0.79
BMI 1.01 0.92 1.13 0.72
No Interaction between
Gender, CEAP or VCSS
C 3-6 is Independent predictor for multiple superficial veins
17. Conclusions
Multiple superficial Axial veins with reflux in the
lower extremity are present in 11% of Patients
Advanced CEAP Clinical Class is an independent
predictor for multiple superficial Axial Veins with
reflux (Odds Ratio of 10 for Multiple Superficial
Axial Vein)
Revised VCSS was not statistically significant
independent predictor for multiple superficial
Axial Veins with reflux.
Editor's Notes
Percentage of patients in each CEAP category.63% ≥ C-3
83/150 ≥1 superficial Axial veins reflux (55.3%) . 10.7% with reflux in ≥2
Cochran- Armitage Trend Test for CEAP Categories <0.0001. there is trend towards multiple superficial veins with worsening CEAP class with P value of <.0001 /what is this test?
CEAP has strong positive correlation 0.5-1.0 is strong
VCSS has moderate correlation as 0.3-0.5 moderate
Age and BMI has no correlation as < 0.1 is no relation
0.1-0.29 is weak
CEAP 0-2 has .09 odds for multiple superficial veins. C3-6 has 11.11 times more odds than C0-2 to have multiple superficial veins . One unit increase in the VCSS has 1.11 odds for multiple superficial veins but not statistically significant.
C 3-6 is Independent predictor for multiple superficial veins with an odds ratio of 10 with vcss,sex, preg, age bmi in the model. One unit increase in the VCS score has 1.04 odds for mutliple superficial veins but not statistically significant in the multivariate model. Here VCSS is continuous variable. If VCSS INCREASES BY ONE POINT, ODDS RATIO FOR MULTIPLE SUPERFICIAL VEINS INCREASES BY 1.04 WITH p VALUE OF 0.56. I believe it would be better to use as continuous variable so we will be consistent with previous published literature. Where VCSS has been used as continuous variable before after the treatemnt. It was not significant even if we use VCSS as categorical variable with splitting data into QUARTILES..
No Interaction between Gender and CEAP or VCSS