Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
  • Save
Migrating to Moodle: Faculty, Student and Technology Perspectives
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Migrating to Moodle: Faculty, Student and Technology Perspectives

  • 4,223 views
Published

Presentation to the SUNY Delhi MoodleMoot on 7 August 2009

Presentation to the SUNY Delhi MoodleMoot on 7 August 2009

Published in Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
4,223
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
6

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Migrating to Moodle: Faculty, Student and Technology Perspectives Keith Landa Purchase College SUNY http://www.slideshare.net/keith.landa What? Why? How?
  • 2. Learning management system (LMS) Virtual learning environment (VLE) Open source - Created by ed, for ed Moodle community - http:// moodle.org Pedagogical origins - Focus on student learning - Emphasis on activities and student engagement International
  • 3.  
  • 4.  
  • 5. Demonstrating Moodle
    • Examples: our student tutorial, Mars Explorations
    • Course organization (& pedagogical implications)
    • Student learning activities
    • Learning resources
    • Communications tools
    • Schedule and navigation
    • (Gradebook / Assessments )
    • Reports
  • 6. Moodle community
    • http://moodle.org
    • Package downloads, themes and modules
    • User documentation
    • Support forums
    • Sandbox environments
    • Moodle tracker
    • Product roadmap ( http://docs.moodle.org/en/Roadmap )
    • Transparent project management
  • 7. LMS review @ Purchase (idealized) Fall 2008 : establish faculty task force; faculty survey of desired features; selection criteria (teaching/learning tools, tech support, cost); sandbox for each alternative LMS; compare representative demo courses; recommendation to faculty Spring 2009 : establish production system; communications plan; pedagogy/training workshops; JIT tutorials; course conversion assistance Context : faculty dissatisfaction with Blackboard; superficial use of LMS; escalating costs Summer 2009 : course conversion and course prep Fall 2009 : migration to new LMS complete
  • 8. LMS review @ Purchase (realized) Fall 2008 : faculty task force established (yes); faculty survey (yes); selection criteria (ambivalence among task force); no formal recommendation to faculty by end of semester Spring 2009 : production system established; pilot Moodle courses (~20); student survey (key driver); ongoing communication; development of general sense among faculty that ‘we’re going with Moodle’…. Context : faculty dissatisfaction with Blackboard; superficial use of LMS; escalating costs Summer 2009 : summer faculty workshop series (new); course conversion and course prep; consolidation of electronic reserves into Moodle courses Fall 2009/Spring 2010 : transition year; one more year of Blackboard; faculty encouraged/assisted to move courses to Moodle; ongoing Moodle workshops; termination of Blackboard at end of year
  • 9. Faculty survey
    • Online survey to all faculty
    • Use of Blackboard, ERes, or not
    • Reasons why not
    • Usage of specific Blackboard features
    • Extent of integration of BB into course
    • Desired features of ideal LMS
  • 10. Faculty qualitative responses Blackboard likes : announcements; document storage/delivery; not having to photocopy materials; easy to navigate / simple interface; available to students anywhere; discussion forums; gradebook; “nothing to like about it” Blackboard dislikes : too static; clunky interface; too many clicks to do anything; enrolling students; entering grades; difficult to format and add forum posts; can’t upload multiple documents; cumbersome assignments and quizzes; doesn’t handle media files well; no blogs & wikis Blackboard wishes : reuse courses easily; blogs & wikis; TurnItIn; more user-friendly discussion forums; merge Blackboard and ERes; better quiz functionality; more integrated listserv, Blackboard, ERes functions; interface with ArtSTOR and EmbARK
  • 11. Faculty Blackboard uses
  • 12. LMS desired features
    • Distribute materials
    • Library services
    • Integration with SIS
    • Course communications
    • Links to external web sites
    • One stop shopping for students
    • Discussion forum
    • Gradebook
    • New media (blogs, wikis, podcasts)
    • Drop boxes
    • Student collaboration tools
    • Course reports
    • Self-directed lessons
    • Online quizzing
    • Real-time tools (chat, etc)
    • Clickers
  • 13. LMS review @ Purchase (realized) Fall 2008 : faculty task force established (yes); faculty survey (yes); selection criteria (ambivalence among task force); no formal recommendation to faculty by end of semester Spring 2009 : production system established; pilot Moodle courses (~20); student survey (key driver); ongoing communication; development of general sense among faculty that ‘we’re going with Moodle’…. Context : faculty dissatisfaction with Blackboard; superficial use of LMS; escalating costs Summer 2009 : summer faculty workshop series (new); course conversion and course prep; consolidation of electronic reserves into Moodle courses Fall 2009/Spring 2010 : transition year; one more year of Blackboard; faculty encouraged/assisted to move courses to Moodle; ongoing Moodle workshops; termination of Blackboard at end of year
  • 14. Student survey
    • Demographic info: major, year, gender, IT comfort, LMS exp.
    • Moodle features ratings
    • Moodle comments, good and bad
    • Blackboard features ratings
    • Blackboard comments, good and bad
    • Direct comparisons
    • Overall preference
  • 15.  
  • 16. n=94 n=93
  • 17. n=75 n=78
  • 18. n=91 n=91
  • 19. n=87 n=86
  • 20. n=79 n=76
  • 21. Student comments http://www.wordle.net
  • 22. n=95
  • 23. LMS review @ Purchase (realized) Fall 2008 : faculty task force established (yes); faculty survey (yes); selection criteria (ambivalence among task force); no formal recommendation to faculty by end of semester Spring 2009 : production system established; pilot Moodle courses (~20) ; student survey (key driver); ongoing communication; development of general sense among faculty that ‘we’re going with Moodle’…. Context : faculty dissatisfaction with Blackboard; superficial use of LMS; escalating costs Summer 2009 : summer faculty workshop series (new); course conversion and course prep; consolidation of electronic reserves into Moodle courses Fall 2009/Spring 2010 : transition year; one more year of Blackboard; faculty encouraged/assisted to move courses to Moodle; ongoing Moodle workshops; termination of Blackboard at end of year
  • 24. Why Moodle @ Purchase? Focus on teaching & learning - Robust set of activities & resources - Add-on modules from the community - Moodle development pathway Costs - No licensing costs - Similar support costs Risk management - Risks of open source - Commercial products have different risks Integration - Other systems - Web 2.0 world Flexible open architecture
  • 25. How to put a production system in place?
    • Build your own
    • Download standard package
    • PHP/SQL web server
    • Accounts
    • Enrollments
    • Add-ons and themes
    • SUNY Purchase
    • Moodle partners
    • Hosting services
      • moodlerooms.com
      • remote-learner.net
      • classroomrevolution.com
    • Custom installation, account management, enrollments, service desk
    • SUNY Delhi
  • 26. Learning Moodle
    • Moodle docs docs.moodle.org
    • Moodle forums moodle.org/course/view.php?id=5
    • www.moodletutorials.org
    • Moodle videos on YouTube
    • Books
    • Get in and start playing with it…….
  • 27. Free Moodle hosting
    • An easy way to a sandbox, for testing & evaluation
    • Production system for campus? – probably not
    • ‘ Free’ hosting involves some business model, e.g. ads
    • Issues: account & enrollment management, support, intellectual property, privacy, ability to customize system??
  • 28. Some options for free hosting Sign up: https://www.keytoschool.com/member/signup.php
  • 29. Demo: setting up your site
    • Front page and Appearance
    • Account management
    • Language packs
    • Activities, blocks and filters
    • Course categories and adding courses
  • 30. Demo: setting up your course
    • Course settings
    • Permissions
    • Configuring blocks
    • Editing topics/weekly summaries
    • Using labels to organize your sections
  • 31. Demo: learning activities
    • Discussion forums
    • Assignments: online, file upload
    • Chat
    • Wikis
    • Glossary / database
    • Quiz