Migrating to Moodle: Faculty, Student and Technology Perspectives - Presentation Transcript
Migrating to Moodle: Faculty, Student and Technology Perspectives Keith Landa Purchase College SUNY http://www.slideshare.net/keith.landa What? Why? How?
Learning management system (LMS) Virtual learning environment (VLE) Open source - Created by ed, for ed Moodle community - http:// moodle.org Pedagogical origins - Focus on student learning - Emphasis on activities and student engagement International
LMS review @ Purchase (idealized) Fall 2008 : establish faculty task force; faculty survey of desired features; selection criteria (teaching/learning tools, tech support, cost); sandbox for each alternative LMS; compare representative demo courses; recommendation to faculty Spring 2009 : establish production system; communications plan; pedagogy/training workshops; JIT tutorials; course conversion assistance Context : faculty dissatisfaction with Blackboard; superficial use of LMS; escalating costs Summer 2009 : course conversion and course prep Fall 2009 : migration to new LMS complete
LMS review @ Purchase (realized) Fall 2008 : faculty task force established (yes); faculty survey (yes); selection criteria (ambivalence among task force); no formal recommendation to faculty by end of semester Spring 2009 : production system established; pilot Moodle courses (~20); student survey (key driver); ongoing communication; development of general sense among faculty that ‘we’re going with Moodle’…. Context : faculty dissatisfaction with Blackboard; superficial use of LMS; escalating costs Summer 2009 : summer faculty workshop series (new); course conversion and course prep; consolidation of electronic reserves into Moodle courses Fall 2009/Spring 2010 : transition year; one more year of Blackboard; faculty encouraged/assisted to move courses to Moodle; ongoing Moodle workshops; termination of Blackboard at end of year
Faculty survey
Online survey to all faculty
Use of Blackboard, ERes, or not
Reasons why not
Usage of specific Blackboard features
Extent of integration of BB into course
Desired features of ideal LMS
Faculty qualitative responses Blackboard likes : announcements; document storage/delivery; not having to photocopy materials; easy to navigate / simple interface; available to students anywhere; discussion forums; gradebook; “nothing to like about it” Blackboard dislikes : too static; clunky interface; too many clicks to do anything; enrolling students; entering grades; difficult to format and add forum posts; can’t upload multiple documents; cumbersome assignments and quizzes; doesn’t handle media files well; no blogs & wikis Blackboard wishes : reuse courses easily; blogs & wikis; TurnItIn; more user-friendly discussion forums; merge Blackboard and ERes; better quiz functionality; more integrated listserv, Blackboard, ERes functions; interface with ArtSTOR and EmbARK
Faculty Blackboard uses
LMS desired features
Distribute materials
Library services
Integration with SIS
Course communications
Links to external web sites
One stop shopping for students
Discussion forum
Gradebook
New media (blogs, wikis, podcasts)
Drop boxes
Student collaboration tools
Course reports
Self-directed lessons
Online quizzing
Real-time tools (chat, etc)
Clickers
LMS review @ Purchase (realized) Fall 2008 : faculty task force established (yes); faculty survey (yes); selection criteria (ambivalence among task force); no formal recommendation to faculty by end of semester Spring 2009 : production system established; pilot Moodle courses (~20); student survey (key driver); ongoing communication; development of general sense among faculty that ‘we’re going with Moodle’…. Context : faculty dissatisfaction with Blackboard; superficial use of LMS; escalating costs Summer 2009 : summer faculty workshop series (new); course conversion and course prep; consolidation of electronic reserves into Moodle courses Fall 2009/Spring 2010 : transition year; one more year of Blackboard; faculty encouraged/assisted to move courses to Moodle; ongoing Moodle workshops; termination of Blackboard at end of year
Student survey
Demographic info: major, year, gender, IT comfort, LMS exp.
Moodle features ratings
Moodle comments, good and bad
Blackboard features ratings
Blackboard comments, good and bad
Direct comparisons
Overall preference
n=94 n=93
n=75 n=78
n=91 n=91
n=87 n=86
n=79 n=76
Student comments http://www.wordle.net
n=95
LMS review @ Purchase (realized) Fall 2008 : faculty task force established (yes); faculty survey (yes); selection criteria (ambivalence among task force); no formal recommendation to faculty by end of semester Spring 2009 : production system established; pilot Moodle courses (~20) ; student survey (key driver); ongoing communication; development of general sense among faculty that ‘we’re going with Moodle’…. Context : faculty dissatisfaction with Blackboard; superficial use of LMS; escalating costs Summer 2009 : summer faculty workshop series (new); course conversion and course prep; consolidation of electronic reserves into Moodle courses Fall 2009/Spring 2010 : transition year; one more year of Blackboard; faculty encouraged/assisted to move courses to Moodle; ongoing Moodle workshops; termination of Blackboard at end of year
Why Moodle @ Purchase? Focus on teaching & learning - Robust set of activities & resources - Add-on modules from the community - Moodle development pathway Costs - No licensing costs - Similar support costs Risk management - Risks of open source - Commercial products have different risks Integration - Other systems - Web 2.0 world Flexible open architecture
How to put a production system in place?
Build your own
Download standard package
PHP/SQL web server
Accounts
Enrollments
Add-ons and themes
SUNY Purchase
Moodle partners
Hosting services
moodlerooms.com
remote-learner.net
classroomrevolution.com
Custom installation, account management, enrollments, service desk
SUNY Delhi
Learning Moodle
Moodle docs docs.moodle.org
Moodle forums moodle.org/course/view.php?id=5
www.moodletutorials.org
Moodle videos on YouTube
Books
Get in and start playing with it…….
Free Moodle hosting
An easy way to a sandbox, for testing & evaluation
Production system for campus? – probably not
‘ Free’ hosting involves some business model, e.g. ads
0 comments
Post a comment