Prioritization matrices
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Prioritization matrices

on

  • 2,892 views

I invite you to join as a member of the PEX Network Group http://tinyurl.com/3hwakem, you will have access to Key Leaders Globally, Events, Webinars, Presentations, Articles, Case Studies, Blog ...

I invite you to join as a member of the PEX Network Group http://tinyurl.com/3hwakem, you will have access to Key Leaders Globally, Events, Webinars, Presentations, Articles, Case Studies, Blog Discussions, White Papers, and Tools and Templates. To access this free content please take 2 minutes for a 1 time FREE registration at http://tiny.cc/tpkd0

Process Excellence Network: A division of IQPC, (formerly known as Six Sigma IQ) provides access to a treasure chest of relevant content for Process Excellence practitioners.

Providing critical knowledge on the development of Process Excellence including Business Process Management (BPM), Lean, Change Management, Operational Excellence, Six Sigma, Risk Management, Customer Experience and more, we provide the forum where key industry experts and organizations share their experience, knowledge and tools, and your practitioner peers connect with one another all over the world, both face-to-face and online.

The Process Excellence Network is enhanced by an active online community of your professional peers, as well and face-to-face Summits and events that take place across the globe. Collectively we help you discover what the best are doing to get measurable results through Process Excellence and to seek actionable solutions to specific process problems through worldwide mass collaboration.

None of us has the time for continuous trial and error learning. We must learn more and more from the experiences of others. Learning is nothing more than thinking with other people's ideas. We bring you the best ideas in a variety of media forms from outstanding academics and practicing professionals.

In short, Process Excellence Network, (often known as PEX Network) enables you to advance your own process excellence journey by increasing your idea sources, widening your contacts and friendships and participating in ongoing formal and informal learning opportunities.

In Summary:
Process Excellence Network is uniquely positioned to provide a comprehensive library of both online and face-to-face content, including first-rate columns, articles, webinars, podcasts, video presentations, and of course globally renown industry events. Through every medium we strive to make your learning an exciting, dynamic, interactive experience.

We are constantly striving to improve our content delivery methodologies. In 2011 we will be introducing many new ways for you to learn. Stay updated. The best is yet to come.

Become a Process Excellence Network member today and you'll have continuous exposure to new and timeless tools, techniques, and technologies to extend your performance capacity and your organization's productivity.

We also invite you to visit e-Zsigma for Lean Six Sigma Training and certification.
e-Zsigma is Canada's leader in strategic Lean, Six Sigma and innovation deployment, project management, consulting and change leadership. http://www.e-zsigma.com

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,892
Views on SlideShare
2,885
Embed Views
7

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
29
Comments
0

2 Embeds 7

http://www.pearltrees.com 6
http://www.docshut.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Prioritization matrices Prioritization matrices Document Transcript

  • Prioritization MatricesThis tool can help you decide what to do after key actions, criteria or Critical-To-Quality (CTQ)characteristics have been identified, but their relative importance (priority) is not known withcertainty. Prioritization matrices are especially useful if problem-solving resources, such as people,time or money, are limited, or if the identified problem-solving actions or CTQs are stronglyinterrelated.To create a matrix, you must judge the relative ability of each possible action to effectively deliver theresults you want compared to every other identified action. The product of your work is a weightedranking of all the possible actions you are considering. The finished matrix can help a team make anoverall decision or determine the sequence in which to attack a problem or work toward an objective.Prioritization matrices are especially useful in the project bounding and analyze phases of Lean SixSigma quality.What can it do for you?You should consider creating a prioritization matrix if:  You cannot do everything at once,  You are uncertain about the best use of your resources or energy or  You are looking toward specific improvement goals.This tool can also help you make a decision in situations where the criteria for a good solution areknown or accepted, but their relative importance is either unknown or disputed. For example, aprioritization matrix might be used to help decide the purchase of a major piece of equipment or theselection of a single-source supplier. Depending on how much time you have and how complex yourproblem is, there are a number of options for constructing a prioritization matrix.How do you do it?1. The first step in applying the Full Analytical Criteria Method is to ensure that the people working on the matrix agree on the ultimate goal they are trying to achieve.2. Next, create a list of criteria or characteristics needed to achieve the goal or meet the objective. (The idea is simply to list the criteria without considering their relative importance. That happens later.) The team can do this by discussion or brainstorming. The purpose is to list all of the criteria that might be applied to all of the options. For example, if the team is considering which improvement step to attack first, some of their criteria might be: a. Low investment cost b. Maximum use of existing technology Note the way the criteria c. High potential dollar savings are worded. They should d. High improvement potential for process speed clearly convey the desired e. High improvement potential for defect reduction outcome. “Low f. High customer satisfaction potential investment cost” is a g. Minimum impact on other processes much clearer criterion h. Ease of implementation than “cost” would be. i. High probability of quick results
  • Criteria being compared to Row Minimal impact Quick Results Satisfaction technology Decreased implement Customer Increased Total Low cost Potential Savings Easy to defects Use of speed % Criteria a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. a. Low Cost 5 b. Use of Technology 0.2 c. Potential Saving d. Increased Speed e. Decreased Defects f. Cutomer Satisfaction g. Minimum Impact h. Easy to Implement i. Quick Results Column Total 3. Once the total list is developed, the next step is to judge the relative importance of each criterion compared to every other criterion. To do that, make an L-shaped matrix with all the criteria listed on both the horizontal and the vertical legs of the L.Compare the importance of each criterion on the vertical side of the matrix to each criterion listedalong the horizontal side using these numeric weightings: 1.0 = The criterion being considered is equally important or equally preferred when judged against the criterion you are comparing it to. 5.0 = The criterion being considered is significantly more important or more preferred. 10.0 = The criterion is extremely more important or more preferred. 0.2 = It is significantly less important or preferred. 0.1 = It is extremely less important or preferred.Although these specific numeric ratings are to some extent arbitrary, by applying them consistently ina prioritization matrix, you will generate a valid understanding of relative importance. Whencompleting or interpreting the matrix, read across the rows (not down the columns). For example, ifcriterion a was significantly more important than criterion b, where row a intersects column b write 5.Remember that, if criterion a is significantly more important that criterion b, criterion b must besignificantly less important than criterion a. Where row b intersects column a write 0.2.Continuing in a similar manner, compare each criterion to every other criterion, reach a decision aboutrelative importance, and enter the appropriate values. Do this until the matrix is full. Remember that,whenever you compare two criteria, you should mark the rating where the row of the criterion beingcompared intersects the column of the criterion you are comparing it to. The inverse of this valueshould be entered where the column of the criterion being compared intersects the row of the criterionyou are comparing it to. That is, you should enter 1 and 1, 5 and 0.2, or 10 and 0.1 for eachcomparison.
  • Add the values recorded in each column; then add the column totals to get the grand total. For Criterion: Option being compared to Row Equipment A Equipment B Equipment C Equipment D Cellularize Cellularize c. High Money Saving Procedure Barcoding Proofing Option 1 Option 2 Error Total New New New New New % Potential Option a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. a. Error Proofing 5 1 5 10 1 0.2 5 1 28.2 16.7% b. New Equipment A 0.2 0.2 1 1 0.2 0.1 0.2 1 3.9 2.3% c. New Equipment B 1 5 5 5 5 0.2 5 1 27.2 16.2% d. New Equipment C 0.2 1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 1 0.2 3.1 1.8% e. New Equipment D 0.1 1 0.2 5 1 0.1 5 0.2 12.6 7.5% f. New Procedures 1 5 0.2 5 1 1 1 1 15.2 9.0% g. Barcoding 5 10 5 10 10 1 5 5 51 30.3% h. Cellularize Option 1 0.2 5 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 0.2 8 4.8% i. Cellularize Option 2 1 1 1 5 5 1 0.2 5 19.2 11.4% Column Total 8.7 33 8 37 32.4 10.4 2.1 27.2 9.6 168.4 100.0%Add the values recorded in each row, then add the row totals to get the grand total. The grand totalacross the columns should agree with the grand total down the rows. If it does not, check your work.Divide each row total by the grand total. This percentage is the weighting that shows the relativeimportance of each criterion. 4. Now that you know the relative importance of each criterion, the next step is to evaluate how well each of your possible choices meet each of the weighted criteria. Those possible choices could be such things as which improvement steps to take first, which piece of equipment to buy or which supplier to use.To complete this step, make a new L-shaped matrix with all your possible choices on both thehorizontal and the vertical legs. If you are considering which improvement steps to take, your possiblechoices might look something like this:A. Error prevention training F. Rewrite procedures for clarityB. Purchase new equipment A G. Implement bar-codingC. Purchase new equipment B H. Cellularize operation 1D. Refurbish existing equipment C I. Cellularize operation 2E. Refurbish existing equipment D 5. Pick the first criterion you wish to consider and compare each possible choice with every other possible choice by asking how well it will deliver that criterion or characteristic. For example, if the first criterion you were considering was high potential dollar savings, you would compare each option with every other option, in terms of its potential to deliver high monetary
  • savings. Build the matrix as you did when initially evaluating the relative importance of the criteria by putting numeric values in the matrix intersections: 1.0 = The choice being considered is equally able to deliver the desired criterion or equally preferred when judged against the choice you are comparing it to. 5.0 = The choice being considered is significantly more important or more preferred. 10.0 = The choice is extremely more important or more preferred. 0.2 = It is significantly less important or preferred. 0.1 = It is extremely less important or preferred. Complete the matrix; add the rows and columns and calculate the percentages as you did with the criteria matrix. Criteria being compared to Row Satisfaction technology Decreased implement Customer Increased Total Low cost Potential Savings Minimal Results Easy to defects impact Use of speed Quick % Criteria a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. a. Low Cost 5 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 1 5 1 12.6 7.5% b. Use of Technology 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 5 1 1 8 4.8% c. Potential Saving 10 5 5 5 5 10 10 1 51 30.3% d. Increased Speed 5 5 0.2 1 1 1 5 1 19.2 11.4% e. Decreased Defects 10 5 0.2 1 1 5 5 1 28.2 16.7% f. Cutomer Satisfaction 5 5 0.2 1 1 5 5 5 27.2 16.2% g. Minimum Impact 1 0.2 0.1 1 0.2 0.2 1 0.2 3.9 2.3% h. Easy to Implement 0.2 1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 1 0.2 3.1 1.8% i. Quick Results 1 1 1 1 1 0.2 5 5 15.2 9.0% Column Total 32.4 27.2 2.1 9.6 8.7 8 33 37 10.4 168.4 100.0%The example above is what a matrix comparing the possible choices for high potential for dollarsavings might look like. 6. In the same way; complete a matrix comparing each of the possible choices for each of the remaining criteria. If we did that for all our criteria, we would have to create a total of nine matrices comparing every combination of possible choices for its relative ability to deliver on each of the identified criteria.You may choose to simplify this process by eliminating some criteria that had a very low percentageweighting. (In our example, we limited ourselves to the five highest-ranking criteria. Besides thematrix for high potential dollar savings, we would create additional matrices for high improvementpotential for process speed, high improvement potential for defect reduction, high customersatisfaction potential and high probability of quick results. These additional matrices are not shownhere.) 7. The final step in the Full Analytical Criteria Method is to merge the relative ability of a possible choice to deliver a desired criterion with the relative weighting of that criterion. To do
  • this, make a new L-shaped matrix with all the options or possible choices on the vertical leg and all the criteria considered on the horizontal leg. Make the columns fairly wide to allow some calculation.Again, in our example, we eliminated some of the criteria to make things simpler.  Under each criterion, in the weight row, note the percentage weighting you got from your first matrix, the one that compared each criterion with every other criterion.  In each criterion column, enter the percentage numbers you got when you compared each option with every other option for that criterion. (The actual matrices for criteria d, e, f and i are not shown.) Enter these numbers as the first numbers in each column of the completed prioritization matrix.  Multiply each option percentage by the criterion percentage weight for that criterion. (The results are the second numbers, the ones after the equal signs in our example.)  Add the results of your multiplication down each column. The result for each column should be approximately the same as that criterion’s percentage weight (the number in the weight row). Criteria High Row High potential Quick Results Highpotential satisfaction decrease of Customer savings defects speed Total % d. c. f. i. e. Weight Weight Weight Weight Weight Options .303 X .114 X .167 X .162 X .090 X a. Error Proofing .167 = .051 .111 = .013 .074 = .012 .169 = .027 .167 = .018 0.121 14.4% b. New Equipment A .023 = .007 .131 = .015 .060 = .010 .041 = .007 .028 = .003 0.042 5.0% c. New Equipment B .162 = .049 .091 = .010 .089 = .015 .153 = .025 .096 = .009 0.108 12.9% d. New Equipment C .018 = .005 .223 = .025 .087 = .015 .113 = .018 .079 = .007 0.070 8.4% e. New Equipment D .075 = .023 .184 = .021 .173 = .029 .274 = .044 .224 = .020 0.137 16.3% f. New Procedures .090 = .027 .029 = .003 .214 = .036 .029 = .005 .091 = .008 0.079 9.4% g. Barcoding .303 = .092 .037 = .004 .101 = .017 .147 = .024 .063 = .006 0.143 17.1% h. Cellularize Option 1 .048 = .015 .104 = .012 .093 = .016 .044 = .007 .175 = .016 0.066 7.9% i. Cellularize Option 2 .114 = .035 .090 = .010 .109 = .018 .030 = .005 .047 = .004 0.072 8.6% Column Total 0.304 0.113 0.168 0.162 0.091 0.838 100.0%  Add the column total row to come up with a grand total.  Now, add the results of your multiplication across each row, and add the row total column. The result should be the same as the grand total you got by adding the column total row.  Divide each row total by the grand total to get the percentage for each option. (Add the percentage scores as a check. The sum should be approximately 100 %.) This is the answer to your question.  These numbers show the relative value of a number of options or possible choices when considered against a collection of independent criteria or critical to quality (CTQ) characteristics.
  • Now what?Any time a choice must be made, some form of prioritization occurs. Those responsible for making thechoice may play a hunch, take a vote or analyze for some specific impact they think is important, butthey will decide what they think is best, most important or should be done first. If the prioritizationprocess is incomplete or arbitrary, chances of success are lessened.The discipline of a prioritization matrix allows you to avoid setting arbitrary priorities that have lesslikelihood of helping you reach your desired objectives. The Full Analytical Method does takeconsiderable time and effort, however, and should be used only if the risks or potential benefits makeit worthwhile. Steven Bonacorsi is the President of the International Standard for Lean Six Sigma (ISLSS) and Certified Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt instructor and coach. Steven Bonacorsi has trained hundreds of Master Black Belts, Black Belts, Green Belts, and Project Sponsors and Executive Leaders in Lean Six Sigma DMAIC and Design for Lean Six Sigma process improvement methodologies. Author for the Process Excellence Network (PEX Network / IQPC). FREE Lean Six Sigma and BPM content International Standard for Lean Six Sigma Steven Bonacorsi, President and Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt 47 Seasons Lane, Londonderry, NH 03053, USA Phone: + (1) 603-401-7047 Steven Bonacorsi e-mail Steven Bonacorsi LinkedIn Steven Bonacorsi Twitter Lean Six Sigma Group