• Like

Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

OCEANIA SEVENS - STATISTICAL REVIEW AND MATCH ANALYSIS

  • 779 views
Uploaded on

IRB Oceania Sevens Championship 2010 - The Oceania Sevens Championship featured 8 rugby teams from Samoa, Australia, Tonga, Papua New Guinea, Niue, Cook Islands, Vanuatu and Tahiti. The competition …

IRB Oceania Sevens Championship 2010 - The Oceania Sevens Championship featured 8 rugby teams from Samoa, Australia, Tonga, Papua New Guinea, Niue, Cook Islands, Vanuatu and Tahiti. The competition was held at Austar Park in Darwin, Australia 1 - 2 October.

More in: Sports , Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
779
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
18
Comments
0
Likes
1

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. STATISTICAL REVIEW AND MATCH ANALYSIS OCEANIA SEVENS CHAMPIONSHIP DARWIN 2010
  • 2. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 Background IRB Oceania Sevens Championship 2010 - The Oceania Sevens Championship featured 8 rugby teams from Samoa, Australia, Tonga, Papua New Guinea, Niue, Cook Islands, Vanuatu and Tahiti. The competition was held at Austar Park in Darwin, Australia 1 - 2 October. Final Standings and Results Final Australia 34 Samoa 12 3rd/4th Playoff Tonga 12 Papua New Guinea 7 5th/6th Playoff Cook Islands 15 Niue 5 7th/8th Playoff Tahiti 19 Vanuatu 7 2
  • 3. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 Teams and Tries This section summarises the number of tries scored and conceded by each during the competition. 40 TRIES SC ORED 35 TRIES C ONCEDED 30 S 25 T N E V E F O 20 R E B M U 15 N 10 5 0 AU S SAM TON PNG COOK NIUE TAH VAN Tries Scored Tries Conceded Australia 1 try / 1.6 mins 1 try / 9.2 mins Samoa 1 try / 1.8 mins 1 try / 5.5 mins Tonga 1 try / 2 mins 1 try / 4.2 mins Papua New Guinea 1 try / 2.3 mins 1 try / 3 mins Cook Islands 1 try / 2. 5 mins 1 try / 3 mins Niue 1 try / 3 mins 1 try / 2.5 mins Tahiti 1 try / 10.5 mins 1 try / 1.2 mins Vanuatu 1 try / 8.4 mins 1 try / 1.1 mins 3
  • 4. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 Origin of Tries This section examines the origin of the phase of attack that resulted in a try. The width and length were coded along with how the phase of attack started and how ties were scored for teams ranked 1-2, 3-4, 5-6 and 7-8. DEFENCE DEFENCE ATTACK ATTACK (22-0m) (22-50m) (22-50m) (22-0m) (SIDE-15M) LH (15M-POST) LH BETWEEN POSTS (15M-POST RH (SIDE-15M) RH Defence Attack How the attack started: • Turnover • Kick • Scrum • Lineout • Breakdown (ruck / maul) • Penalty / tap-kick 4
  • 5. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 How tries were scored: describes primary try scoring method • Kick-chase (try scorer received the ball from a kick) • Overlap (attack created an overlap and passed the ball to unmarked player) • Outrun (attacking ball carrier received the ball in space and outran defence) • Offload in tackle (attack offloaded the ball in tackle to try scorer) • Evasive skills (try scorer used evasive skills to outmanoeuvre the defence) • Contact skills (try scorer broke free from attempted tackle) Team Ranking 1. Australia (AUS) 2. Samoa (SAM) 3. Tonga (TON) 4. Papua New Gunea (PNG) 5. Cook Islands (COOK) 6. Niue (NIUE) 7. Tahitii (TAH) 8. Vanuatu (VAN) Game analysis grouped team ranking: • Team 1-2 (Australia and Samoa) • Team 3-4 (Tonga and Papua New Guinea) • Team 5-6 (Cook Islands and Niue) • Team 7-8 (Tahiti and Vanuatu) 5
  • 6. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 Tries Scored: start of phase • Breakdown most common start of phase play resulting in a try • Team 7-8 tended to score tries from a turnover • Even distribution of width for the start phase resulting in a try • Teams 1-2 displayed highest percentage of tries scored from attacking 22m • Teams 7-8 scored the highest percentage of tries from attacking 22 – 50m How the phase started that resulted in a try scored 50 TEAM 1-2 45 TEAM 3-4 TEAM 5-6 40 TEAM 7-8 35 PERCENT OCCURENCE 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 TURNOVER KICK SCRUM LINEOUT BREAKDOWN PENALTY/TAP-KICK TRIES SCORED - HOW THE TRY (PHASE) STARTED 6
  • 7. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 Field position: width of starting phase resulting in a try scored 45 TEAM 1-2 40 TEAM 3-4 TEAM 5-6 35 TEAM 7-8 30 PERCENT OCCURENCE 25 20 15 10 5 0 RH(SIDELINE-15M) RH (15M-POST) BETWEEN POSTS LH(15M-POST) LH(SIDELINE-15M) TRIES SCORED - FIELD POSITION (WIDTH) WHERE THE TRY (PHASE) STARTED Field position: length of starting phase resulting in a try scored 60 TEAM 1-2 TEAM 3-4 50 TEAM 5-6 TEAM 7-8 40 PERCENT OCCURENCE 30 20 10 0 ATTACK(22-0M) ATTACK(22-50M) DEFENCE(22-50M) DEFENCE(22-0M) TRIES SCORED - FILED POSITION (LENGTH) WHERE THE TRY (PHASE) STARTED 7
  • 8. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 Tries Conceded: start of phase • Team 1-2 concede few tries from set piece (scrums / lineouts) • Teams 1-2 and 3-4 concede larger percentage of tries from turnovers • Team 1-2 concede most tries through left side of field • Team 5-6 and 7-8 concede most tries through right hand wing • Team 1-2 concede a high percentage of tries from within the opposing team’s own half (long-range tries) • Team 7-8 concede a large number of tries from within the attacking team’s 50 – 22m zone. How the phase started that resulted in a try conceded 70 TEAM 1-2 TEAM 3-4 60 TEAM 5-6 TEAM 7-8 50 PERCENT OCCURENCE 40 30 20 10 0 TURNOVER KICK SCRUM LINEOUT BREAKDOWN PENALTY/TAP-KICK TRIES CONCEDED - HOW THE TRY (PHASE) STARTED 8
  • 9. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 Field position: width of starting phase resulting in a try conceded 45 TEAM 1-2 40 TEAM 3-4 TEAM 5-6 35 TEAM 7-8 30 PERCENT OCCURENCE 25 20 15 10 5 0 RH(SIDELINE-15M) RH (15M-POST) BETWEEN POSTS LH(15M-POST) LH(SIDELINE-15M) TRIES CONCEDED - FIELD POSITION (WIDTH) WHERE THE TRY (PHASE) STARTED Field position: length of starting phase resulting in a try conceded 50 TEAM 1-2 45 TEAM 3-4 TEAM 5-6 40 TEAM 7-8 35 PERCENT OCCURENCE 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 ATTACK(22-0M) ATTACK(22-50M ) DEFENCE(22-50M) DEFENCE(22-0M) TRIES CONCEDED - FIELD POSITION (LENGTH) WHERE THE TRY (PHASE) STARTED 9
  • 10. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 Tries Scored • Team 1-2 have a consistent try scoring pattern • Team 7-8 score a large number of tries during the 1st quarter and few tries during the 4th quarter of the game • Team 1-2 rely on evasive skills and overlaps to score tries • Team 7-8 display a high number of kick-chase tries • All teams except 1-2 tend to rely on tries scored through the attacking player outrunning the defence • All teams attempt to score tries between the posts (easier conversion) When tries were scored 50 TEAM 1-2 45 TEAM 3-4 TEAM 5-6 40 TEAM 7-8 35 PERCENT OCCURENCE 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1ST QUARTER 2ND QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 4TH QUARTER TRIES SCORED - TIME OF TRY SCORING 10
  • 11. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 How tries were scored 50 TEAM 1-2 45 TEAM 3-4 TEAM 5-6 40 TEAM 7-8 35 PERCENT OCCURENCE 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 KICK-CHASE OVERLAP OUTRUN OFFLOAD IN TACKLE EVASION SKILLS CONTACT SKILLS TRIES SCORED - MEANS OF TRY SCORING Field position: width of tries scored 50 TEAM 1-2 45 TEAM 3-4 TEAM 5-6 40 TEAM 7-8 35 PERCENT OCCURENCE 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 RH(SIDELINE-15M) RH (15M-POST) BETWEEN POSTS LH(15M-POST) LH(SIDELINE-15M) TRIES SCORED - FIELD POSITION (WIDTH) WHERE THE TRY (PHASE) WAS SCORED 11
  • 12. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 Tries Conceded • Team 1-2 concede tries commonly in the 1st and 4th quarters • Team 3-4 concede tries commonly in the 2nd quarter • Team 5-6 concede tries commonly in the 1st and 4th quarters • Even distribution of how team 1-2 concede tries (kick-chase, overlap, outrun and offload) • Team 3-4 and 5-6 high percent tries conceded through outrunning • Team 5-6 and 7-8 high percent tries conceded through evasive skills When tries were conceded 40 TEAM 1-2 TEAM 3-4 35 TEAM 5-6 TEAM 7-8 30 PERCENT OCCURENCE 25 20 15 10 5 0 1ST QUARTER 2ND QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 4TH QUARTER TRIES CONCEDED - TIME OF TRY SCORING 12
  • 13. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 How tries were conceded 35 TEAM 1-2 TEAM 3-4 30 TEAM 5-6 TEAM 7-8 25 PERCENT OCCURENCE 20 15 10 5 0 KICK-CHASE OVERLAP OUTRUN OFFLOAD IN TACKLE EVASION SKILLS CONTACT SKILLS TRIES CONCEDED - MEANS OF TRY SCORING Field position: width of tries conceded 40 TEAM 1-2 35 TEAM 3-4 TEAM 5-6 30 TEAM 7-8 PERCENT OCCURENCE 25 20 15 10 5 0 RH(SIDELINE-15M) RH (15M-POST) BETWEEN POSTS LH(15M-POST) LH(SIDELINE-15M) TRIES CONCEDED - FIELD POSITION (WIDTH) WHERE THE TRY (PHASE) WAS SCORED 13
  • 14. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 Critical moment that resulted in tries scored: Critical moment describes an instance occurring during the attacking phase of play that determined a try would be scored. • Team 1-2 high percent critical moments in attacking 22m • Team 7-8 high percent critical moment in attacking 22-50m Field position: width of critical moment resulting in a try scored 50 TEAM 1-2 45 TEAM 3-4 TEAM 5-6 40 TEAM 7-8 35 PERCENT OCCURENCE 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 RH(SIDELINE-15M) RH (15M-POST) BETWEEN POSTS LH(15M-POST) LH(SIDELINE-15M) TRIES SCORED - FIELD POSITION (WIDTH) WHERE THE CRITICAL MOMENT OF THE TRY (PHASE) OCCURED Field position: length of critical moment resulting in a try scored 70 TEAM 1-2 TEAM 3-4 60 TEAM 5-6 TEAM 7-8 50 PERCENT OCCURENCE 40 30 20 10 0 ATTACK(22-0M) ATTACK(22-50M) DEFENCE(22-50M) DEFENCE(22-0M) TRIES SCORED - FIELD POSITION (LENGTH) WHERE THE CRITICAL MOMENT OF THE TRY (PHASE) OCCURED 14
  • 15. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 Tries Conceded • Most critical moments on left-hand side of the field • Team 1-2 high percent of critical moments on left-hand midfield (15m-post) Field position: width of critical moment resulting in a try scored 40 TEAM 1-2 TEAM 3-4 35 TEAM 5-6 TEAM 7-8 30 PERCENT OCCURENCE 25 20 15 10 5 0 RH(SIDELINE-15M) RH (15M-POST) BETWEEN POSTS LH(15M-POST) LH(SIDELINE-15M) TRIES CONCEDED - FIELD POSITION (WIDTH) WHERE THE CRITICAL MOMENT OF THE TRY (PHASE) OCCURED Field position: length of critical moment resulting in a try scored 60 TEAM 1-2 TEAM 3-4 50 TEAM 5-6 TEAM 7-8 40 PERCENT OCCURENCE 30 20 10 0 ATTACK(22-0M) ATTACK(22-50M ) DEFENCE(22-50M) DEFENCE(22-0M) TRIES CONCEDED - FIELD POSITION (LENGTH) WHERE THE CRITICAL MOMENT OF THE TRY (PHASE) OCCURED 15
  • 16. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 Instances coded for each try scored TEAM RANK PHASE START TRY SCORED CRITICAL MOMENT SCORE CONCEDE WIDTH LENGTH HOW WIDTH HOW TIME (QTR) WIDTH LENGTH 1 2 1 1 4 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 5 2 4 1 3 4 1 1 1 2 4 2 4 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 4 2 4 5 1 3 4 2 1 2 4 3 2 5 0 3 4 3 1 3 4 1 0 4 5 1 4 1 1 3 2 1 0 5 2 1 2 1 1 3 2 2 4 2 4 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 0 5 1 4 2 1 1 3 3 3 5 3 4 3 5 2 1 3 4 3 0 3 2 2 4 3 1 3 1 3 4 5 0 2 5 3 1 5 1 1 5 1 5 3 1 1 1 5 3 1 4 4 1 4 4 1 1 5 1 3 4 3 4 2 3 3 1 7 1 1 3 4 3 1 4 1 1 7 1 1 3 4 2 1 3 1 1 7 1 2 1 4 4 1 2 2 1 7 1 2 1 3 5 2 4 2 1 7 5 2 0 1 1 2 5 2 1 7 4 2 0 5 3 3 5 2 1 7 1 2 3 1 1 3 2 2 1 7 1 2 4 5 1 4 4 2 1 7 2 1 2 4 0 4 4 2 1 8 1 2 4 2 5 1 2 1 1 8 1 1 4 5 1 2 4 1 1 8 3 2 4 2 4 3 1 1 1 8 5 2 4 4 3 3 5 1 1 8 5 1 5 1 1 4 2 1 1 8 5 3 4 3 2 1 1 2 1 8 1 1 4 3 4 2 4 2 1 8 2 3 4 3 5 2 5 3 1 8 3 4 4 5 5 3 3 4 2 1 2 1 4 4 4 2 4 1 2 1 2 2 0 3 4 4 5 1 2 4 5 2 4 2 1 1 1 1 2 4 2 2 4 1 1 2 4 1 16
  • 17. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 2 4 5 1 4 3 4 3 3 1 2 4 5 1 0 5 2 4 5 1 2 4 4 2 0 1 1 2 4 2 2 4 4 2 0 4 2 4 4 2 2 4 1 3 2 1 1 3 1 3 2 6 1 1 5 1 1 1 3 1 2 6 1 2 4 3 3 2 4 1 2 6 1 1 4 4 5 4 3 1 2 6 2 2 4 4 0 4 2 2 2 6 1 4 4 3 3 1 4 3 2 7 5 2 0 5 4 1 5 1 2 7 3 1 2 5 2 2 4 1 2 7 4 1 2 3 1 3 2 1 2 7 3 3 2 5 2 1 5 2 2 7 5 3 4 3 1 3 4 2 2 7 1 2 4 3 4 3 3 2 2 7 1 2 3 1 5 3 1 2 2 7 4 3 0 5 1 4 4 3 2 8 2 1 4 2 4 1 1 1 2 8 1 1 5 3 1 2 3 1 2 8 2 2 4 5 3 4 5 1 2 8 1 2 3 5 2 1 1 2 2 8 2 2 2 3 4 2 3 2 2 8 5 3 5 5 4 3 5 2 2 8 2 2 2 3 4 4 2 2 2 8 1 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 2 8 2 3 1 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 4 1 4 3 5 1 3 1 3 1 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 3 1 5 3 1 2 5 1 5 3 3 4 3 1 2 2 5 2 2 1 3 4 1 1 2 1 5 4 1 1 3 5 1 2 4 5 2 1 5 1 3 5 1 3 4 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 5 2 4 1 2 4 2 2 3 5 2 3 2 4 2 3 5 3 3 6 4 1 5 4 5 1 4 1 3 6 3 1 4 2 1 2 2 1 3 6 2 2 4 1 2 3 3 2 3 6 1 4 0 1 2 4 1 4 3 8 2 2 2 4 3 1 5 1 17
  • 18. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 3 8 3 2 2 4 3 2 3 1 3 8 5 1 5 4 5 2 4 1 3 8 2 2 5 3 3 4 4 1 3 8 3 2 0 1 5 4 1 1 3 8 1 2 3 3 2 1 5 2 3 8 5 2 2 1 2 3 2 2 3 8 1 2 1 4 1 4 4 2 4 2 1 2 0 5 1 4 2 2 4 2 1 4 5 3 0 2 4 3 4 2 5 4 5 3 2 2 1 4 4 3 5 3 0 4 2 3 5 3 4 5 4 3 4 3 3 2 5 2 4 5 5 4 1 3 2 1 5 3 4 5 5 3 3 3 0 1 5 3 4 6 2 1 4 2 3 2 2 1 4 6 4 2 5 3 4 1 1 2 4 6 2 2 4 5 3 3 3 2 4 6 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 2 4 6 2 3 4 2 2 2 2 3 4 7 5 1 3 2 4 4 1 1 4 7 3 3 4 1 2 1 1 2 4 7 1 2 2 3 4 2 4 2 4 7 1 3 3 3 4 3 3 2 4 7 3 2 4 3 4 4 3 2 4 7 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 3 5 1 4 4 5 4 0 1 4 3 5 3 1 3 2 3 0 2 3 2 5 3 5 3 4 3 0 2 3 2 5 4 5 1 4 1 1 1 5 1 5 4 1 2 2 5 4 4 3 1 5 4 1 2 4 2 4 2 2 2 5 6 5 2 4 2 2 2 3 1 5 6 5 2 3 1 3 3 1 1 5 6 1 1 4 2 4 4 1 1 5 8 1 1 0 2 2 3 1 1 5 8 5 1 0 5 5 3 5 1 5 8 1 2 3 3 5 2 5 2 5 8 5 1 4 3 4 1 3 2 5 8 1 3 5 3 2 3 5 2 5 8 5 3 4 3 4 3 5 3 5 8 1 4 0 3 1 2 5 3 18
  • 19. IRB GAME ANALYSIS – OCEANIA SEVENS 2010 5 8 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 6 2 3 3 2 5 2 2 3 4 6 4 5 1 3 4 2 4 5 1 6 4 1 4 1 2 2 4 2 3 6 5 1 3 4 5 0 1 4 3 6 7 2 2 5 4 4 3 2 1 6 7 4 1 4 4 3 1 3 1 6 7 5 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 6 7 5 2 4 1 2 1 4 2 6 7 4 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 6 7 2 2 4 4 4 2 4 2 6 7 5 3 2 5 2 1 4 2 6 7 1 2 0 1 2 4 4 2 6 7 5 3 0 3 4 3 5 3 6 7 2 3 1 5 2 4 5 3 7 6 5 2 4 4 0 3 4 2 7 8 4 1 4 3 5 2 3 1 7 8 1 2 3 3 5 1 3 2 7 8 3 2 4 1 5 3 1 2 8 2 4 3 0 3 2 1 4 3 8 5 5 2 0 4 2 1 5 2 8 5 1 2 4 4 0 4 4 2 8 5 1 3 0 4 2 2 4 2 8 7 2 3 2 3 2 1 2 3 19