Social Media Measurement 2009

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

1 comments

Comments 1 - 1 of 1 previous next Post a comment

  • + BarbChamberlain Barb Chamberlain 2 weeks ago
    This presentation by @kdpaine was a highlight of the #SNCR 2009 conference.
Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

5 Favorites

Social Media Measurement 2009 - Presentation Transcript

  1. Social Media Measurement Techniques and Tips  October 14 , 2009Katie Delahaye PaineCEOkdpaine@kdpaine.comwww.kdpaine.comhttp:/kdpaine.blogs.comMember, IPR Measurement Commissionwww.instituteforpr.org
  2. What Matters?
    To P&G: Engagement
    To the Humane Society: Donations
    To ComCast: Happier customers
    To Best Buy: Better informed employees
    To WMUR: Faster, more complete, more relevant stories
    To Dell: Sales
    To Molson: Better messaging
  3. What Doesn’t Matter?
    AVEs
    Eyeballs
    HITS (How Idiots Track Success)
    Couch Potatoes
    # of Twitter Followers (unless you’re a celebrity)
    # of Facebook Friends/Fans (unless they donate money)
    Page 3
  4. Page 4
    You are a party planner, not a communicator
    21st Century
    Old School
  5. Page 5
    Social Media renders everything you know about measurement obsolete
    Old School PR
    21st Century Role of PR
    The definition of timely has changed
    The definition of reach has changed
    GRPs & Impressions are impossible to count (an irrevelvant) in social media
    The definition of success has changed
    The answer isn’t how many you’ve reached, but how those you’ve reached have responded
  6. Some really scary numbers* if you’re an ad agency
    More respondents spend more time on daily personal Intent usage than watching TV
    53% of DVR owners watch at least 50% of content on replay – skipping ads all together
    Consumer Internet ad spend outpaces TV spend by 3X
    26% of US respondents have already contributed content to social networking sites.
    32% said they follow recommendations from friends
    2 out of 3 ad execs expect ad revenue to shift from impression-based to impact based metrics within three years
    *The End of Advertising as we Know it , IBM 2009
  7. Signs that it’s the end of measurement as we know it
    11 Moms make a bigger difference than 11 million
    1 person on Twitter changed the reputation of Comcast
    1 CEO’s blog is changing the face of healthcare in Boston
    Facebook USERS translated the site from English to Spanish via a Wiki in less than 4 weeks and cost Facebook $0
    Dell has made more money on Twitter than Twitter has
    Ex-employee networks are helping companies lower costs and speed response times
    The Epping, NH police department is on Twitter
  8. The New Rules of Communications
    You aren’t in control and never have been
    There is no market for your message
    You become what you measure
    She/he with the most data wins
    Behind every Tweet or Post is a person
    Empower employees, rely on customers
    Enable the conversations—it’s going on, with or without you
    Spin is dead, long live transparency – you can’t fake it so be who you are and see who is pleased
    Crowdsourcing will beat outsourcing every time
  9. The Engagement Decision Tree
  10. Goals for Social Media
    Marketing/leads/sales/
    Mission/safety/civic engagement
    Relationship/reputation/positioning
    To fix this
    Or get to this
  11. Goals drive metrics, metrics drive results
    11
    Goal
    Metrics
  12. Change the conversation, improve your reputation
    Improve your reputation
    Listen first, then respond
    Stop doing stupid things
  13. Negative coverage over time
  14. Goals, Actions and Metrics
  15. The 7 steps to Social Media ROI
    Define the “R” – Define the expected results?
    Define the “I” -- What’s the investment?
    Understand your audiences and what motivates them
    Define the metrics (what you want to become)
    Determine what you are benchmarking against
    Pick a tool and undertake research
    Analyze results and glean insight, take action, measure again
  16. Step 1: Define the “R”
    What return is expected? – Define in terms of the business or mission.
    What were you hired to do? What difference are you expected to make?
    If you are celebrating complete 100% success a year from now, what is different about the organization?
    If your department was eliminated, what would be different?
    16
  17. Step 2: Define the “I”
    What is the investment?
    Personnel
    Agency compensation
    Senior Staff time
    Opportunity cost
    Raw costs/hr costs vs material costs.
    17
  18. Step 3: Define your audiences and how you impact them
    There is no “audience.” There are multiple constituencies
    Should you blog or Twitter? Don’t ask me, ask your customers
    List every stakeholder
    Where do they go for information?
    What’s important to them?
    What is the benefit of having a good relationship with that stakeholder group?
    What’s important to them?
    Where do they go for information?
    What do you want them to know?
    Understand your role in getting the audience to do what you want it to do
    Raise awareness
    Increase preference
    Increase engagement
    18
  19. Step 4: Define your Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
    19
    The Perfect KPI
    Gets you where you want to go (achieves corporate goals)
    Is actionable
    Continuously improves your processes
    Is there when you need it
    KPIs should be developed for:
    Your own properties
    Different tactics
    Other influential sites
  20. Step 4: Define your Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) carefully because you become what you measure
    Cost savings
    Efficiency
    Cost per message communicated
    Cost per new lead/customer acquired
    Productivity:
    Increase in employee engagement/morale
    Lower turnover/recruitment costs
    Engagement:
    Ratio of posts to comments
    % of repeat visitors
    % of 5+min visitors
    % of registrations
    Trust:
    Improvement in relationship /reputation scores with customers and communities (Loyalty/Retention)
    Thought leadership:
    Share of quotes
    Share of opportunities
    Message penetration
    Positioning on key issues
    Improvement in favorable/unfavorable ratio
    Improvement in Optimal Content Score (OCS)
    20
  21. KPIs for External blogs and other Consumer Generated Media
    Share of positioning
    Share of rants vs. raves
    Share of positives/negatives
    Share of visibility
    Share of quotes
    Share of brand benefits mentioned
    Types of conversations
    Engagement – ratio of posts to comments
    Optimal content score
  22. Revenue KPIs
    Cost savings
    Cost per click thru, downloads, engagement vs other marketing channels
    Cost per message communicated vs other channels
    Lifetime value of engagement
    Cost per customer acquisition
  23. Engagement metrics
    % increase or decrease in unique visits
    In the past  month,  what % of all sessions represent more than 5 page views
    % of sessions that are greater than 5 minutes in duration
    % of visitors that come back for more than 5 sessions
    % of sessions that arrive at your site from a Google search, or a direct link from your web site or other site that is related to your brand
    % of visitors that become a subscriber
    % of visitors that download something from the site
    % of visitors that provide an email address
    Ratio of posts to comments
    Courtesy of Eric Peterson
  24. For all institutions, most postings were simply making an observation or distributing media.
    Page 24
    cx
  25. Share of conversation vs share of engagement
    Page 25
    Share of Engagement by Subject
    -
    ,External Blogs
    Share of Subject
    Students
    23.6%
    33.2%
    22.1%
    21.1%
    Staff
    100.0%
    Research, Social Sciences
    1
    4
    1
    Research, Social Sciences
    4.4%
    95.6%
    Campus Life
    Research, Physical Sciences
    1
    38.3%
    2.3%
    31.0%
    28.4%
    Research, Other
    Institution, Overall
    2
    1
    3
    Research, Life Sciences
    13.0%
    20.8%
    13.0%
    53.2%
    Policies
    2
    Research, Earth Sciences
    86.8%
    13.2%
    Research, Agriculture
    4
    Research, Agriculture
    100.0%
    Projects, Non
    -
    Research
    Other
    28.6%
    28.6%
    28.6%
    14.2%
    1
    Policies
    100.0%
    Legal News
    Peer 1
    1
    2
    Partnerships
    Michigan State
    Admissions
    1
    1
    Peer 1
    Other
    Peer 2
    Staff
    Michigan State
    1
    Legal News
    43.3%
    56.7%
    Peer 3
    Inventions
    Peer 2
    Research, Life Sciences
    1
    1
    2
    1
    3
    Peer 4
    Institution, Overall
    5.8%
    94.2%
    Peer 3
    Alumni Topics
    1
    1
    Financials
    68.7%
    12.5%
    18.8%
    Peer 4
    Financials
    2
    1
    2
    Faculty
    15.3%
    34.9%
    6.3%
    43.5%
    Projects, Non
    -
    Research
    Events
    1
    1
    1
    2
    Courses
    28.6%
    71.4%
    Research, Earth Sciences
    1
    2
    2
    Community Relations
    Courses
    1
    2
    Campus Life
    Research, Physical Sciences
    3
    2
    4
    6
    Alumni Topics
    96.8%
    3.2%
    Admissions
    Students
    33.3%
    66.7%
    5
    2
    1
    7
    Faculty
    2
    6
    2
    2
    6
    0%
    10%
    20%
    30%
    40%
    50%
    60%
    70%
    80%
    90%
    100%
    0
    2
    4
    6
    8
    10
    12
    14
    16
    18
    20
  26. The vast majority of discussion in external blogs is neutral.
    Page 26
  27. Emerging benchmarks
    Past Performance
    Think 3
    Peer
    Underdog nipping at your heels
    Stretch goal
    Whatever keeps the C-suite up at night
    Step 5: Define your benchmarks
    27
  28. Non-Profit industry benchmarks in social media
    28
  29. Overview of Key Metrics
    Peer 1 was the competitive leader in all but YouTube, where Peer 4 and Peer 3 led.
    Actions attributed to individuals were responsible for most content, except on YouTube.
  30. Few subjects appear across all forms of social media, so tailor outreach accordingly
  31. Benchmarks put numbers in perspective
    Page 31
  32. Step 6: Pick a tool
    Content Analysis
    Survey
    Web Analytics
  33. Step 6: Selecting a measurement tool
    33
  34. Content Analysis requires:
    A content source:
    Google News/Google Blogs, RSS feeds
    Technorati, Social Mention, Twazzup,
    Cyberalert, CustomScoop, e-Watch
    Radian 6, Techrigy, Sysymos, Visible Technologies, Scout Labs
    34
  35. A way to analyze content
    Automated vs. Manual
    Census vs random sample
    The 80/20 rule – Measure what matters because 20% of the content influences 80% of the decisions
    Dashboards to aggregate data
    35
  36. A coding methodology
    Tonality
    What messages were communicated
    How you’re positioned on key issues
    Dominance/Prominence/Visibility
    Subject of the article/posting
    Who was quoted?
    Products, events, initiatives, battles mentioned
  37. Standard classifications of discussion
    • Responding to criticism
    • Giving a shout-out
    • Making a joke
    • Making a suggestion
    • Making an observation
    • Offering a greeting
    • Offering an opinion
    • Putting out a wanted ad
    • Rallying support
    • Recruiting people
    • Showing dismay
    • Soliciting comments
    • Soliciting help
    • Starting a poll
    • Validating a position
    • Acknowledging receipt of information
    • Advertising something
    • Answering a question
    • Asking a question
    • Augmenting a previous post
    • Calling for action
    • Disclosing personal information
    • Distributing media
    • Expressing agreement
    • Expressing criticism
    • Expressing support
    • Expressing surprise
    • Giving a heads up
  38. Standard classifications of videos
    Advertisement
    Animation
    Demonstration
    Event/Performance
    Fiction
    Film
    Home Video
    Instructional Video
    Interview
    Lecture
    Montage
    Music Video
    News Broadcast
    Promotional Video
    Sightseeing/Tour
    Slideshow
    Speech
    Television Show
    Video Log
  39. Why an Optimal Content Score?
    You decide what’s important:
    Benchmark against peers and/or competitors
    Track activities against OCS over time
    Positive:
    Mentions of the brand
    Key messages
    Positioning
    Visibility
    Negative
    Omitted
    Negative tone
    No key message
    39
  40. How to calculate Optimal Content
  41. Building Measures
    Units of content
    Overall theme (when many messages are combined)
    Entire message (e.g. article, blog post, etc.)
    Message parts (brand mentions, paragraphs, sentences)
    Types of content
    Manifest: on the surface
    Latent: the meaning or interpretation of the content
    Latent Pattern: meaning determined by surface observations
    Latent Projective: meaning determined by coder interpretation
  42. Building Measures (cont.)
    Variables are exhaustive/ mutually exclusive
    One can always be selected, and only one
    Types of variables
    Nominal: categories, “buckets”
    Brands mentioned, organizations mentioned, messages communicated
    Ordinal: categories with an order or scale
    Tonality, prominence, dominance
    Numbers: number of words (zero means no words), number of brand mentions
  43. Surveys require:
    A defined sample
    A list – a way to get to that sample
    Agreement on what questions you need to answer
    A survey instrument/questionnaire
    A test
    A way to analyze data
    SPSS
    SAS
    43
  44. Aspects of relationships
    Control mutuality
    Trust
    Satisfaction
    Commitment
    Exchange relationship
    Communal relationship
    44
  45. Control Mutuality
    The degree to which parties agree on who has the rightful power to influence one another. Although some imbalance is natural, stable relationships require that organizations and publics each have some control over the other.
    45
  46. Questions that test Control Mutuality
    This organization and people like me are attentive to what each other says.
    This organization believes the opinions of people like me are legitimate.
    In dealing with people like me, this organization has a tendency to throw its weight around. (Reversed)
    This organization really listens to what people like me have to say.
    The management of this organization gives people like me enough say in the decision-making process.
    46
  47. Measuring Trust
    One party’s level of confidence in and willingness to open oneself to the other party. Includes:
    Integrity: the belief that an organization is fair and just
    Dependability: the belief that an organization will do what it says it will do
    Competence: the belief that an organization has the ability to do what it says it will do.
    47
  48. Questions to measure trust
    This organization treats people like me fairly and justly.
    Whenever this organization makes an important decision, I know it will be concerned about people like me.
    This organization can be relied upon to keep its promises.
    I believe that this organization takes the opinions of people like me into account when making decisions.
    I feel very confident about this organization’s skills.
    This organization has the ability to accomplish what it says it will do.
    48
  49. Measuring satisfaction
    The extent to which each party feels favorably toward the other because positive expectations about the relationship are reinforced. A satisfying relationship is one in which the benefits outweigh the costs.
    49
  50. Questions to Measure Satisfaction
    I am happy with this organization.
    Both the organization and people like me benefit from the relationship.
    Most people like me are happy in their interactions with this organization.
    Generally speaking, I am pleased with the relationship this organization has established with people like me.
    Most people enjoy dealing with this organization.
    50
  51. Measuring commitment
    The extent to which each party believes and feels that the relationship is worth spending energy to maintain and promote.
    51
  52. Commitment
    I feel that this organization is trying to maintain a long-term commitment to people like me.
    I can see that this organization wants to maintain a relationship with people like me.
    There is a long-lasting bond between this organization and people like me.
    Compared to other organizations, I value my relationship with this organization more.
    I would rather work together with this organization than not.
    52
  53. Measuring relationships
    Exchange Relationship
    In an exchange relationship, one party gives benefits to the other only because the other has provided benefits in the past or is expected to do so in the future.
    Communal Relationship
    In a communal relationship, both parties provide benefits to the other because they are concerned for the welfare of the other -- even when they get nothing in return.
    53
  54. Exchange Relationships
    Whenever this organization gives or offers something to people like me, it generally expects something in return.
    Even though people like me have had a relationship with this organization for a long time; it still expects something in return whenever it offers us a favor.
    This organization will compromise with people like me when it knows that it will gain something.
    This organization takes care of people who are likely to reward the organization.
    54
  55. Communal Relationships
    This organization does not especially enjoy giving others aid. (Reversed)
    This organization is very concerned about the welfare of people like me.
    I feel that this organization takes advantage of people who are vulnerable. (Reversed)
    I think that this organization succeeds by stepping on other people. (Reversed)
    This organization helps people like me without expecting anything in return.
    55
  56. How to implement relationship metrics
    Step 1: Conduct a benchmark relationship study
    Step 2: Implement PR program
    Step 3: Conduct a follow up relationship study
    Step 4: Look at what’s changed
  57. Web Analytics Require:
    Google Analytics/Web Trends/Omniture
    Unique URLs
    Data delivered in parallel with content analysis
    Ability to correlate and integrate data
    SPSS/SAS
    57
  58. Step 7: Analysis - -Research without insight is just trivia
    Look for failures first
    Check to see what the competition is doing
    Then look for exceptional success
    Compare to last month, last quarter, 13-month average
    Figure out what worked and what didn’t work
    Move resources from what isn’t working to what is
    58
  59. Ask for money
    Get Commitment
    Manage Timing
    Influence decisions
    Get Outside help
    Just Say No
    Actionable Conclusions
    59
  60. Overall Comparison of Georgia Tech Social Media Outlets
    60/17
    • Based on 2007 data, Georgia Tech outperformed its peers in Facebook presence, but significantly lagged peers on other social media.
    • Post-2007 media monitoring has not included a social media dimension due to funding constraints, but this will be important to trend as feasible in the future.
    Share of All Coverage
    Definitions: YouTube: a video sharing site. Social Bookmarking: a site where members can display media they have found on the web. Facebook: a social networking site. Institutional Blogs: blogs hosted and owned by schools studied. External Blog: any blog post that is not hosted by an institution.
  61. Best Practices:
    Correlations to bottom-line impact
    Donations
    Memberships
    Sign-ups
    Leads
    Using SMM for planning
    Define the time frame, market/topic you want to study
    Use Google News, Technorati or Radian6 to identify the conversations around the topic
    Analyze the conversations for type, tone and positioning
    Look at share of positioning, tone or conversation
    Benchmarking against your peers
    Looking at what the best do
    Setting goals accordingly
    Use data to persuade recalcitrant spokespeople
    Social Media in Crisis
    Listen instantly to a wide range of influencers
    Identify weaknesses in communications, customer service, or in the product
    Improve your reputation
    Listen first, then respond
    Stop doing stupid things
  62. Using SMM for planning
    The environmental scan
    Defining issues in a market
    Selecting a positioning that works
  63. Benchmarks put numbers in perspective
    Page 63
  64. Diversity dominates C-M discussions in Social Media
    Page 64
  65. Where people get the content they share on Facebook
    Sources of content
    Genre of content
  66. Understanding brand ownership of online video content
    Use ownership to signal brand participation
    Provide alerts for possible brand management issues
  67. 8 ways to do research without a budget
    Become someone’s research project
    Involve your board of directors and volunteers
    Research something that HAS a budget
    Take advantage of free offers
    Become a case study
    Team up with peer organizations
    Analyze data that already exists
    Use blogs and social networks to listen to conversations
    67
  68. Thank You!
    For more information on measurement, read my blog: http://kdpaine.blogs.com or subscribe to The Measurement Standard:
    www.themeasurementstandard.com
    For a copy of this presentation go to: http://www.kdpaine.com
    Follow me on Twitter: KDPaine
    Friend me on Facebook: Katie Paine
    Or call me at 1-603-868-1550

+ kdpainekdpaine, 1 month ago

custom

1219 views, 5 favs, 1 embeds more stats

More info about this document

© All Rights Reserved

Go to text version

  • Total Views 1219
    • 1218 on SlideShare
    • 1 from embeds
  • Comments 1
  • Favorites 5
  • Downloads 40
Most viewed embeds
  • 1 views on http://smresearch.ru

more

All embeds
  • 1 views on http://smresearch.ru

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories