P R S A S M M Master Class 11 09 - Presentation Transcript
Social Media Measurement: Establishing ROI A PRSA Master Class November 8, 2009Katie Delahaye PaineCEOkdpaine@kdpaine.comwww.measuresofsuccess.comhttp:/kdpaine.blogs.comMember, IPR Measurement Commissionwww.instituteforpr.org
Agenda Basic Definitions Basic rules of Measurement Tools, Tips & Techniques Case Studies Hands on Measurement Workshop
First, somenumbers 48% of respondents to a PRWeek study said they were moving $$ out of advertising budgets into Social Media. Only 18% said they were taking $$ away from PR. Ashton Kutcher and Ellen Degeneres have more Twitter followers than the entire populations of Ireland, Norway and Panama If Facebook were a country it would be the 5th largest on earth. Facebook USERS translated the site from English to Spanish via a Wiki in less than 4 weeks and cost Facebook $0 78% of consumers trust peer recommendations , only 14% trust advertisements Only 18% of traditional TV campaigns generate a positive ROI 91% of Inc 500 companies are now using social media 38% aren’t monitoring their brand, product or reputation in social media 2-3 years. How long before impression-based ad revenue model 6 – avg number of links in a blog 33 – the percent of shared content on social media sites that comes from traditional media. 3
Signs that it’s the end of measurement as we know it Procter & Gamble is now paying for engagement, not eyeballs Sodexo cut $300K out of its recruitment budget using Twitter Comcast avoided government regs and improvevd customer service via Twitter Immunize BC used social media to boost awareness and increase percentage of population immunized BMC Software measures communications effectiveness based on contribution to EPS HSUS generated $650,000 in new donations from an on-line photo contest on Flickr The Red Cross judges success in terms of property saved and loss averted NWF generated 85,000 new followers in a month via a Twitter hash tag IBMreceives more leads, sales and exposure from a $500 podcast than it does from a $40K ad program Wal-Mart credits Q109 profits to 11 Moms Stanford University calculates ROI from Facebook based on applications & retention
Conquering your fears
A measurement timeline
Old School Metrics AVEs Eyeballs HITS (How Idiots Track Success) Couch Potatoes # of Twitter Followers (unless you’re a celebrity) # of Facebook Friends/Fans (unless they donate money) Page 7
Page 8 Social Media renders everything you know about measurement obsolete Old School PR 21st Century Role of PR The definition of timely has changed The definition of reach has changed GRPs & Impressions are impossible to count (an irrevelvant) in social media The definition of success has changed The answer isn’t how many you’ve reached, but how those you’ve reached have responded
The Engagement Decision Tree
Goals for Social Media Marketing/leads/sales/ Mission/safety/civic engagement Relationship/reputation/positioning To fix this Or get to this
Change the conversation, improve your reputation Improve your reputation Listen first, then respond Stop doing stupid things
Negative coverage over time
Correlation exists between traffic to the ASPCA web site and the organization’s overall media exposure
Tying activity to development/marketing goals 15
What do you need to measure?
Goals, Actions and Metrics
The 7 steps to Social Media ROI Define the “R” – Define the expected results? Define the “I” -- What’s the investment? Understand your audiences and what motivates them Define the metrics (what you want to become) Determine what you are benchmarking against Pick a tool and undertake research Analyze results and glean insight, take action, measure again
Step 1: Define the “R” Why Social Media? What return is expected? – Define in terms of the business or mission. What problems is Social Media supposed to solve? What were you hired to do? What difference are you expected to make? If you are celebrating complete 100% success a year from now, what is different about the organization? If your Social Media is eliminated, what would be different? 19
Step 2: Define the “I” What is the investment? Personnel Agency compensation Senior Staff time Opportunity cost 20
Step 3: Define your audiences and how you impact them There is no “audience.” There are multiple constituencies Should you blog or Twitter? Don’t ask me, ask your customers List every stakeholder Where do they go for information? What’s important to them? What is the benefit of having a good relationship with that stakeholder group? What’s important to them? Where do they go for information? What do you want them to know? Understand your role in getting the audience to do what you want it to do Raise awareness Increase preference Increase engagement 21
Step 4: Define your Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) 22 The Perfect KPI Gets you where you want to go (achieves corporate goals) Is actionable Continuously improves your processes Is there when you need it KPIs should be developed for: Your own properties Different tactics Other influential sites
Step 4: Define your Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) carefully because you become what you measure Cost savings Efficiency Cost per message communicated Cost per new lead/customer acquired Productivity: Increase in employee engagement/morale Lower turnover/recruitment costs Engagement: Ratio of posts to comments % of repeat visitors % of 5+min visitors % of registrations Trust: Improvement in relationship /reputation scores with customers and communities (Loyalty/Retention) Thought leadership: Share of quotes Share of opportunities Message penetration Positioning on key issues Improvement in favorable/unfavorable ratio Improvement in Optimal Content Score (OCS) 23
KPIs for External blogs and other Consumer Generated Media Share of positioning Share of desirable discussion Share of visibility Share of quotes Share of brand mentions Share of desired conversation types Improvement in engagement scores Optimal content score
Revenue KPIs % reduction in cost perclick thru, downloads, engagement vs other marketing channels Cost per message communicated vs other channels Reduction in cost per share point of visibility Lifetime value of engagement Cost per customer acquisition
Engagement KPIs % increase or decrease in unique visits In the past month, what % of all sessions represent more than 5 page views % of sessions that are greater than 5 minutes in duration % of visitors that come back for more than 5 sessions % of sessions that arrive at your site from a Google search, or a direct link from your web site or other site that is related to your brand % of visitors that become a subscriber % of visitors that download something from the site % of visitors that provide an email address Ratio of posts to comments Courtesy of Eric Peterson
The Concept Difference in share of votes between Bloomberg & Thompson: 5 Difference in campaign cost: $95 million Cost per share point = $19 million Reducing cost per share point gain
Applying share point gain to your business Share of discussion before social media campaign: 10% Share of discussion after social media campaign: 20% Cost of social media campaign: $20,000 Cost per share point = $2,000 Correlate to market share or compare to awareness gains
Emerging benchmarks Past Performance Think 3 Peer Underdog nipping at your heels Stretch goal Whatever keeps the C-suite up at night Step 5: Define your benchmarks 29
Some benchmarks in social media 30
Blogs and Twitter dominated the social media landscape 31
Consumer organizations are far more likely to see Undesirable Discussion than non-profits or educational institutions. 32 *For each mention, we determine whether it leaves the reader more or less likely to donate to, partner with, volunteer for or otherwise support the efforts of Non-Profit Organization. If it leaves the reader more likely, we consider it positive. If it leaves the reader less likely, we consider it negative. If it doesn’t sway the reader one way or the other, we consider it neutral.
Key Message penetration lags the non-profit average 33
Focus on fewer key messages with shorter statements 34 Recommendation: Less is more when trying to get your messages across. We recommend reducing the number of key messages and simplifying and shortening the key messages that are tracked.
Most conversations were making observations rather than expressing support 35
Consumer organizations tend to be the focal point of more conversations 36
Consumer companies saw a significantly higher level of visibility than non-profits 37
Overview of Key Metrics Peer 1 was the competitive leader in all but YouTube, where Peer 4 and Peer 3 led. Actions attributed to individuals were responsible for most content, except on YouTube.
Overview of Key Metrics Peer 1 was the competitive leader in all but YouTube, where Peer 4 and Peer 3 led. Actions attributed to individuals were responsible for most content, except on YouTube.
Step 6: Pick a tool Content Analysis Survey Web Analytics
A way to analyze content Automated Human: Census vs random sample Sentiment vs Topics The 80/20 rule – Measure what matters because 20% of the content influences 80% of the decisions 43
A coding methodology Tonality What messages were communicated How you’re positioned on key issues Dominance/Prominence/Visibility Authority Subject of the article/posting Who was quoted? Products, events, initiatives, battles mentioned Optimal Content Score
What matters, what doesn’t
Standard classifications of discussion
Responding to criticism
Giving a shout-out
Making a joke
Making a suggestion
Making an observation
Offering a greeting
Offering an opinion
Putting out a wanted ad
Rallying support
Recruiting people
Showing dismay
Soliciting comments
Soliciting help
Starting a poll
Validating a position
Acknowledging receipt of information
Advertising something
Answering a question
Asking a question
Augmenting a previous post
Calling for action
Disclosing personal information
Distributing media
Expressing agreement
Expressing criticism
Expressing support
Expressing surprise
Giving a heads up
Standard classifications of videos Advertisement Animation Demonstration Event/Performance Fiction Film Home Video Instructional Video Interview Lecture Montage Music Video News Broadcast Promotional Video Sightseeing/Tour Slideshow Speech Television Show Video Log
Why an Optimal Content Score? You decide what’s important: Benchmark against peers and/or competitors Track activities against OCS over time Positive: Mentions of the brand Key messages Positioning Visibility Negative Omitted Negative tone No key message 48
How to calculate Optimal Content
Charting OCS over time between divisions
Surveys require: A defined sample A list – a way to get to that sample Agreement on what questions you need to answer A survey instrument/questionnaire A test A way to analyze data SPSS SAS 51
Aspects of relationships Control mutuality Trust Satisfaction Commitment Exchange relationship Communal relationship 52
Components of a Relationship Index Control mutuality In dealing with people like me, this organization has a tendency to throw its weight around. (Reversed) This organization really listens to what people like me have to say. Trust This organization can be relied on to keep its promises. This organization has the ability to accomplish what it says it will do. Satisfaction Generally speaking, I am pleased with the relationship this organization has established with people like me. Most people enjoy dealing with this organization. Commitment There is a long-lasting bond between this organization and people like me. Compared to other organizations, I value my relationship with this organization more Exchange relationship Even though people like me have had a relationship with this organization for a long time; it still expects something in return whenever it offers us a favor. This organization will compromise with people like me when it knows that it will gain something. This organization takes care of people who are likely to reward the organization. Communal relationship This organization is very concerned about the welfare of people like me. I I think that this organization succeeds by stepping on other people. (Reversed)
How to implement relationship metrics Step 1: Conduct a benchmark relationship study Step 2: Implement PR program Step 3: Conduct a follow up relationship study Step 4: Look at what’s changed
Web Analytics Require: Google Analytics/Web Trends/Omniture Unique URLs Data delivered in parallel with content analysis Ability to correlate and integrate data SPSS/SAS 55
Step 7: Analysis - -Research without insight is just trivia Look for failures first Check to see what the competition is doing Then look for exceptional success Compare to last month, last quarter, 13-month average Figure out what worked and what didn’t work Move resources from what isn’t working to what is 56
Ask for money Get Commitment Manage Timing Influence decisions Get Outside help Just Say No Actionable Conclusions 57
Best Practices: Correlations to bottom-line impact Donations Memberships Sign-ups Leads Using SMM for planning Define the time frame, market/topic you want to study Use Google News, Technorati or Radian6 to identify the conversations around the topic Analyze the conversations for type, tone and positioning Look at share of positioning, tone or conversation Benchmarking against your peers Looking at what the best do Setting goals accordingly Use data to persuade recalcitrant spokespeople Social Media in Crisis Listen instantly to a wide range of influencers Identify weaknesses in communications, customer service, or in the product Improve your reputation Listen first, then respond Stop doing stupid things
Case Studies
For all institutions, most postings were simply making an observation or distributing media. Page 60 cx
Share of conversation vs share of engagement Page 61 Share of Engagement by Subject - ,External Blogs Share of Subject Students 23.6% 33.2% 22.1% 21.1% Staff 100.0% Research, Social Sciences 1 4 1 Research, Social Sciences 4.4% 95.6% Campus Life Research, Physical Sciences 1 38.3% 2.3% 31.0% 28.4% Research, Other Institution, Overall 2 1 3 Research, Life Sciences 13.0% 20.8% 13.0% 53.2% Policies 2 Research, Earth Sciences 86.8% 13.2% Research, Agriculture 4 Research, Agriculture 100.0% Projects, Non - Research Other 28.6% 28.6% 28.6% 14.2% 1 Policies 100.0% Legal News Peer 1 1 2 Partnerships Michigan State Admissions 1 1 Peer 1 Other Peer 2 Staff Michigan State 1 Legal News 43.3% 56.7% Peer 3 Inventions Peer 2 Research, Life Sciences 1 1 2 1 3 Peer 4 Institution, Overall 5.8% 94.2% Peer 3 Alumni Topics 1 1 Financials 68.7% 12.5% 18.8% Peer 4 Financials 2 1 2 Faculty 15.3% 34.9% 6.3% 43.5% Projects, Non - Research Events 1 1 1 2 Courses 28.6% 71.4% Research, Earth Sciences 1 2 2 Community Relations Courses 1 2 Campus Life Research, Physical Sciences 3 2 4 6 Alumni Topics 96.8% 3.2% Admissions Students 33.3% 66.7% 5 2 1 7 Faculty 2 6 2 2 6 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
The vast majority of discussion in external blogs is neutral. Page 62
Overall Comparison of Georgia Tech Social Media Outlets 63/17
Based on 2007 data, Georgia Tech outperformed its peers in Facebook presence, but significantly lagged peers on other social media.
Post-2007 media monitoring has not included a social media dimension due to funding constraints, but this will be important to trend as feasible in the future.
Share of All Coverage Definitions: YouTube: a video sharing site. Social Bookmarking: a site where members can display media they have found on the web. Facebook: a social networking site. Institutional Blogs: blogs hosted and owned by schools studied. External Blog: any blog post that is not hosted by an institution.
Where people get the content they share on Facebook Sources of content Genre of content
USO Case Study
66
Moving conversation from observation to support
Social Media OverviewMarch 2009 68
Media Engagement & Online Giving 35,152,789 OTS Red line indicates media impressions 6,253,852 OTS
Thank You! For more information on measurement, read my blog: http://kdpaine.blogs.com or subscribe to The Measurement Standard: www.themeasurementstandard.com For a copy of this presentation go to: http://www.kdpaine.com Follow me on Twitter: KDPaine Friend me on Facebook: Katie Paine Or call me at 1-603-868-1550
0 comments
Post a comment