Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Death penalty overview
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Death penalty overview

2,128
views

Published on


0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,128
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
21
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Capital Punishment
  • 2. a Capital Offense is a Murder that...(THISVARIES FROM STATETO STATE!) •is particularly vile, atrocious, or cruel •has multiple victims •occurred during the commission of another felony •has a victim that was a police/correctional officer in the line of duty •offender was previously convicted of a capital offense or violent crime •offender directed an accomplice to commit murder or committed murder at the direction of another
  • 3. Aggravating vs. Mitigating • Aggravating Factor- something that makes a murder more serious, allows prosecutor to ask for DP • Mitigating Factor- something the jury can consider in favor of the defendant, can lessen sentence
  • 4. Aggravating FACTORS • •train wrecking TYPE OFVICTIM •elected official •law enforcement- police, parole officer, firefighter, etc •court officials- judge, lawyer, juror, witness •hate crime •informant •pregnant woman •youth/child •handicapped person “OTHER”
  • 5. Mitigating Circumstances • age (under 18, over 75) • another cause for death • co-defendant spared DP • cooperation with authorities • extreme duress • extreme mental/emotional disturbance • impaired capacity • mentally retarded • minor participation • moral justification • no future threat
  • 6. Ohio’s Revised CodeAGGRAVATING FACTORS 1.Elected Official 2.Murder for hire 3.murder while in jail, or after breaking out 4.purposeful killing or attempt to kill 5.victim was law enforcement officer 6.murder happened during other crime (kidnapping, rape, arson, robbery, other murder) 7.witness to prevent testimony •victim under age of 13 1.commit terrorism MITIGATING FACTORS
  • 7. Severity of Crimes • FIRST-DEGREE MURDER: committed with deliberate and premeditated malice (also if victim is police officer or witness to a crime) • SECOND-DEGREE MURDER: committed with malice, but without deliberation or premeditation • VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER: killing done in the heat of moment, provoked by acts of the victim (such as violent assault) • INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER (Criminally Negligent Homicide) killing with there is no intention to kill, occurs when killing is a result of another crime (robbery) or out of negligence (car wreck) • JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDE: intentional killing dones in accordance with legal obligations (execution of criminals), killings necessary to prevent a felony, or killings in self-defense
  • 8. Methods of Execution • Decapitation • Electrocution • Firing Squad • Gas Chamber • Hanging • Shooting • Stoning • Lethal injection • and more...
  • 9. Topics for Debate...• Is it really Revenge? • Proportionality to Crime • Is it Barbaric? • Expense • Use of DNA • Public Opinion • Executing the Innocent? • Inconsistent eyewitness testimony • Fairness between races and classes • Religious Arguments • Criminal Justice System
  • 10. 90%+ of death-row inmates are poor. Why is this? Don’t rich people commit crimes? •Poor legal representation (overworked, overwhelmed public defenders... or new to the process of capital cases?) •Police and prosecutorial misconduct (forced confessions) •Perjured testimony or mistaken eyewitness testimony •Racial prejudice •Jailhouse “snitch” (shorter sentence for new testimony) •Suppression or misrepresentation of mitigating evidence •Community or political pressure to solve cases Can It Be Fair... To The Poor???
  • 11. Why SoExpensive? • more pre-trial preparation • more pre-trial motions to file/answer • more experts to hire • usually 2 or more attorneys • jurors pre-screened • jurors sequestered during trial • two trials instead of one, one for guilt and second for sentencing • trial takes longer (estimated 3-5 times longer in length) • series of required appeals
  • 12. LEGAL RULINGS • Furman v Georgia 1972- DP is “arbitrary and capricious”, violated ban on “cruel and unusual punishment”... DP suspended in US • Gregg v Georgia 1976- revisions in state laws resumed DP • Estelle v Smith 1981- mental incompetence/retardation • Ring v Arizona 2005- only sentenced by jury • Roper v Simmons 2005- min. age of 18
  • 13. Should CP Be Banned? YES 1. Financial costs to taxpayers 2. It’s barbaric and violates the "cruel and unusual" clause in the Bill of Rights. 3. The endless appeals and required additional procedures clog our court system. 4. We have to move away from the "eye for an eye" revenge mentality 5. It sends the wrong message: why kill people who kill people to show killing is wrong. 6. Life in prison is a worse punishment and a more effective deterrent. 7. Other countries (especially in Europe) would have a more favorable image of America. 8. Some jury members are reluctant to convict if it means putting someone to death. 9. The prisoner's family must suffer from seeing their loved one put to death by the state, as well as going through the emotionally-draining appeals process. 10.The possibility exists that innocent men and women may be put to death. 11.Mentally ill patients may be put to death. 12.It creates sympathy for the monstrous perpetrators of the crimes. 13.It often draws top talent laywers who will work for little or no cost due to the publicity of the case and their personal beliefs against the morality of the death penalty, increasing the chances a technicality or a manipulated jury will release a guilt person. • It is useless in that it doesn't bring the victim back to life.
  • 14. 1. Gives closure to the victim's families who have suffered so much. 2. It creates another form of crime deterrent. 3. Justice is better served. 4. Justice system shows more sympathy for criminals than it does victims. 5. It provides a deterrent for prisoners already serving a life sentence. 6. DNA testing and other methods of modern crime scene science can now effectively eliminate almost all uncertainty as to a person's guilt or innocence. 7. Prisoner parole or escapes can give criminals another chance to kill. 8. It contributes to the problem of overpopulation in the prison system. 9. It gives prosecutors another bargaining chip in the plea bargain process, which is essential in cutting costs in an overcrowded court system Should CP Be Banned? NO!