CPD in HE - Research project information

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    CPD in HE - Research project information - Presentation Transcript

    1. Continuing Professional Development in Higher Education Challenges and Opportunities Karin Crawford University of Lincoln [email_address] http://webpages.lincoln.ac.uk/kcrawford
    2. Overview of presentation
      • Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in Higher Education (HE)
      • Context
        • A little about me and my interest in CPD
        • The national and local context of CPD in HE
      • My ‘desk research’ and initial investigations
        • Challenges and tensions
        • Opportunities and good practice
      • About me
      • An academic; a researcher; a teaching fellow; a student
      • Personal journey from professional and managerial experience to academia
      • CPD and lifelong learning – earlier research
      • Current research project
      • Developing an understanding of the influences on the CPD practices of academics in HE
      • Multi-case study - qualitative research
      • Set in context of change, competing demands and expectations
      • Offers a voice for academics and staff developers
      • Opportunity to influence approaches to CPD in institutions
    3. National context of CPD in HE
      • A focus on CPD and the enhancement of the quality of teaching
      • Professional Standards Framework for teaching and supporting learning in HE (HEA 2006)
      • The Higher Education Academy Professional Recognition Scheme
      ‘… good-quality teaching for everyone…(by)…staff that are trained to teach and continue to develop professionally…’ (DfES 2003: 49)
    4. National context of CPD in HE /continued. . .
      • New ‘Professional Standards for teachers, tutors and trainers in the lifelong learning sector’
      • The 14-19 agenda (DfES 2005) and the Leitch Review (2006)
      • Quality audit processes – Quality Assurance Agency ( www.qaa.ac.uk )
      • Higher Education Funding Council (HEFCE) supporting ‘institutions in enhancing the quality of their learning and teaching’ ( www.hefce.ac.uk )
      ‘ Reflection and evaluation of their own practice and their continuing professional development as teachers’ (LLUK 2007: 3)
    5. Local context of CPD in HE
      • Historical institutional context
      • The University of Lincoln mission
      • Policies and strategies
      • A range of partnerships – meeting a range of needs and demands
      ‘ To be recognised as a university of quality and distinction’
    6. Challenges and tensions
      • Contradictions; ‘dualisms’; ‘fault lines’ (Clegg 2003: 37)
      • Dual role of HE as providers and consumers
      • What constitutes CPD?
      • Academic identity
          • Teaching-Research
          • Competing loyalties and priorities
      • Complexity of academic role
      • The rhetoric and the reality
    7. Dual role of HE (with regard to CPD)
      • HE as established providers of CPD for others …….BUT
      • … HE is less developed in provision of CPD for own staff (Clegg 2003)
      • Staff development organised very differently in different institutions
          • Issues of location
          • Issues of status
      • There is seemingly no one way of facilitating or providing CPD in HE
      • Complex range of approaches; cultures; priorities; beliefs; and actions – impacting on staff developers, institutions and individual academics
    8. What constitutes CPD?
      • Formal or informal learning? The iceberg analogy - ‘ not all professional knowings are explicit ’ (Knight 2006: 31)
      • As well as accredited courses - CPD can be seen as arising from personal scholarship and normal working activities (Becher 1999, Clegg 2003)
      • How will arguably increasing external demands, e.g. implementation of the standards frameworks impact on this debate?
    9. Academic identity – ‘academic tribes’
      • Research – Teaching Nexus
      • Traditionally perceived disproportionate status
      • Professional standards focus on teaching and learning
      • University of Lincoln
        • drive to embed research informed teaching
        • revised structures to enhance the status of quality teaching and learning in the institution
      • Significant implications for CPD – for institutions and individuals
      ‘’ . . .two academic tribes – those who prioritize research within their career, and those who tend to prioritize teaching’ (Ramsden cited in Trigwell and Shale 2004: 523)
    10. Academic identity – loyalties and priorities
      • Academics situated in many ‘communities of practice’ (Wenger 1998) therefore potentially different . . . .
        • discourses
        • understandings of CPD
        • CPD requirements
        • professional histories
        • priorities
        • approaches to teaching and learning
    11. The academic role ‘… the academic role is in flux’ (Blackmore and Blackwell 2003: 19)
      • Traditional role of teaching, researching and administration
      • Changing expectations – a wider range of tasks and responsibilities
      • Subject ‘expert’? Teaching and learning ‘expert’ Both? Something else?
      • Many different forms of ‘tenure’ – part-time, hourly, ‘guest’, ‘visiting’…
      • Changing meaning of the term ‘academic’ - different meanings across different institutions and functions
    12. CPD – whose goals and needs?
      • Relationship between needs of the institution and needs of the academic;
      • Tension in whose goals are to be met and who is responsible;
      • Potential disparity between policy rhetoric and policy achievement (Field 2002);
      • A lack of consensus on meaning and scope of CPD
        • the core tension in this relationship is that between those needs for the continuity of the work practice and individuals’ needs to realise their personal or vocational goals’
        • (Billett 2002: 56)
    13. A local investigation
      • Very small scale, early ‘test-bed’
      • Qualitative questionnaire
      • Purpose – to explore understandings of CPD and perceived links to teaching quality enhancement
      • Respondent profile:
        • fourteen respondents –
        • 9 departments,
        • academics, learning resources, one person was a manager, individuals working in relevant central functions supporting teaching and learning
        • 57% (8) male – 43% (6) female
        • Average years working in HE = 12
        • Average years at University of Lincoln = 8
    14. Summary of findings – defining CPD CPD in HE is ‘ subject development, updating, scholarly activity, and research and/or pedagogical development updating, innovation, and/or development opportunities for management/leadership ’ (Academic, female) CPD in HE is ‘in a constantly changing environment, the process whereby you ensure that the skills and knowledge required to teach your subject and support student learning are up to date ‘ (Staff member in a role that supports teaching and learning (male) ‘ different approaches and understanding across faculty and departments, therefore different arrangements’ (Academic female)
    15. Summary of findings – whose goals and needs? CPD in HE is ‘ support in making progress in line with the objectives of the university, faculty, department and personal aspirations for career development’’ (Academic manager, male) ‘ ..addressing the needs of the individual member of staff’ (Academic male) ‘… advancing one’s own work’ (Academic, male)
    16. Summary of findings – content and focus of CPD
    17. Opportunities
      • New policies, structures and strategies at the University of Lincoln
      • The opportunity to ‘take ownership’ as academics drive ‘a combination of top-down and bottom-up strategies…’ (Zuber-Skerritt 1992: 192 italics in original).
      • Considering how to involve the students of the university in CPD for staff (Leeds Met. University)
      • Acknowledge and value difference across disciplines – but share good practice – ‘mainstream’ CPD
    18. Opportunities
      • Explore and learn from the practices of other institutions (nationally and internationally)
      • A shift to a focus on learning – then being inclusive across the institution – everyone involved in student learning working together on common projects (Clegg 2003)
    19. Presentation Summary
      • Challenges and opportunities
      • Reflection on own practices
      • Opportunity for debate
      ‘ .. problematising our conceptions of continuing professional development can open up space for debate’ (Clegg 2003: 37)
    20. For any further information – visit my web pages at http://webpages.lincoln.ac.uk/kcrawford or email me [email_address] Thank you for listening !
    21. References
      • Becher, T. (1999) Professional Practices: Commitment and capability in a changing environment New Jersey: Transaction Publishers
      • Billett, S. R. (2002) ‘Critiquing workplace learning discourses: Participation and continuity at work’ Studies in the Education of Adults 34 (1) 56-67
      • Blackwell, R. and Blackmore, P. (2003) ‘Rethinking strategic staff development’ in R. Blackwell and P. Blackmore (Eds) Towards Strategic Staff Development in Higher Education’ pp3-15
      • Clegg, S. (2003) ‘Problematising Ourselves: Continuing Professional Development in Higher Education’ International Journal for Academic Development Vol 8, No. 1/2 pp.37-50
      • Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2003) The future of higher education The Stationery Office
      • Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2005) 14-19 Education and Skills Nottingham: DfES publications
      • Field, J (2002) ‘Governing the ungovernable: why lifelong learning policies promise so much yet deliver so little’ in R. Edwards, N. Miller, N. Small and A. Tait (Eds) Supporting Lifelong Learning Volume 3, Making Policy Work . London: Routledge
    22. References Continued/….
      • Higher Education Academy (HEA) (2006) The UK Professional Standards Framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education www.heacademy.ac.uk
      • Knight, P. (2006) ‘Quality Enhancement and Educational Professional Development’ Quality in Higher Education Vol 12 (1) p.29-40
      • Leitch, S. (2006) Leitch Review of skills – Prosperity for All in the Global Economy: World Class Skills Norwich: HMSO
      • LLUK (2007) New overarching professional standards for teachers, tutors and trainers in the lifelong learning sector www.lifelonglearninguk.org
      • Trigwell, K. and Shale, S. (2004) ‘Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching’ Studies in Higher Education Vol 29, No.4. pp524-525
      • Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identify Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
      • Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992) Professional Development in Higher Education London: Kogan Page

    + Karin CrawfordKarin Crawford, 2 years ago

    custom

    744 views, 1 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    A presentation given at the University of LIncoln S more

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 744
      • 742 on SlideShare
      • 2 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 2 views on http://karincrawford.info

    more

    All embeds
    • 2 views on http://karincrawford.info

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories