Impact of Texting & Predictive Potential of Health Literacy on Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes

7,789 views
7,584 views

Published on

Presentation at Stanford Medicine 2.0 in September, 2011.

0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
7,789
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3,181
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
69
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Impact of Texting & Predictive Potential of Health Literacy on Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes

  1. 1. Impact of Texting & Predictive Potential of Health Literacy onMedication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes Kevin A. Clauson, PharmD
  2. 2. Acknowledgments Shara Elrod, PharmD Angela Garcia, PharmD Elizabeth Sherman, PharmD Paula Eckardt, MD Fadi Alkhateeb, BSPharm, MBA, PhD Support from Mobilizing for Healthsm grant program (Disclosure)
  3. 3. Objectives• Review fundamentals of diabetes, health literacy, and mobile health (mHealth)• Explore decision points that informed study design in this research-in-progress interventional SMS study• Discuss hurdles experienced and future directions
  4. 4. $174 billionannual cost burden of diabetes Popul Health Metr 2010;8:29.
  5. 5. Insulin escorts _________ into the cells
  6. 6. Insulin escorts _________ into the cells
  7. 7. Health Literacy “degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, andunderstand basic healthinformation and services needed to make appropriate health decisions” Healthy People 2010
  8. 8. eHealth Literacy Lily Model J Med Internet Res 2006;8(2):e9.
  9. 9. mHealth is the use of mobile devices and global networks todeliver health services and information
  10. 10. mHealth Deviceso Phoneso iPad/TabletPCo Glowcapo Raisino USBo Fitbito Greengoose
  11. 11. Who uses mobile phones?
  12. 12. 82% of American adults owns a cell phone* Owns *Range: 57% (65+) to 90% (18-29)Pew Cell Phones and American Adults 2010 Does not own
  13. 13. Pew Internet Mobile Access 2010 87% of blacks and Hispanics own a cell phone**Compared to 80% of whites
  14. 14. Pew Internet Mobile Access 2010 Hispanics use their phone to go online and to text more frequently than any other group**English-speaking Hispanics
  15. 15. Primary Study Objective Improve medication adherence indiverse, underinsured population in USA with T2DM via text message reminders
  16. 16. Secondary Study Objective Examine predictive potential of health literacy for adherence
  17. 17. Why choose simple SMS as an intervention?GoLiveSMS
  18. 18. Methods (aka why did wemake the decisionswe did in the study)
  19. 19. Randomized, open-label trialAllocation method where all subjectshave equal chance of study groupassignment
  20. 20. Detect a significantdifference (two treatment arms)
  21. 21. Consumers would most prefer to receive a medication reminder via: Phone call 1.3 Buzzing drug vial 2.5 Email 15.2 19.5 Phone alarm 20.3 App 41.1 Text message/SMS 0 20 40 60 80 100 PercentSource: Consumer Health Information Corporation, April 2011 (n=395)
  22. 22. Smartphone OS Share 2% 3% 9% 38% Android iPhone 21% BlackBerry Windows HP webOS Other 27%Source: Nielsen Mobile Insights 2011
  23. 23. People will stop doing almost anything to check their text messages
  24. 24. Mobile allows targeting of populationshistorically associated with health disparities Annu Rev Public Health 2011;32:399-416.
  25. 25. Study of 130 adult patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled for 6 month intervention period
  26. 26. Recruitment from 5 Memorial Primary Care Centers
  27. 27. How is medication adherence being measured?
  28. 28. How is medication adherence being measured? Morisky Medication Adherence Scale Hemoglobin A1C
  29. 29. Surveys and measurement REALM-SFDiabetes Knowledge Test Satisfaction/fatigue
  30. 30. What hurdles are we trying to overcome?
  31. 31. Integrating a Tablet For data collection
  32. 32. SecurityPrivacyLegality
  33. 33. JAMA 2009;302(11):1159-60.Honk ififyou loveready Jesus Text to meet Him! you’re
  34. 34. Images• http://www.mhs.net/• http://www.ucwv.edu/• http://www.mckesson.com/en_us/McKesson.com/• http://www.quickpwn.com/2010/06/iphone-4.html• http://cdn.pocketnow.com/html/portal/news/0000015324/incredible-s-screen.jpg• http://www.atakos.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Blackberry-8800.jpg• http://www.mobirolla.com/wp-content/uploads/Windows-Phone-7.png• http://mobihealthnews.com/7074/vitality-taps-telit-for-glowcap-connectivity/• http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124934548487503195.html• http://www.vidagranola.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/fitbit.gif• http://news.cnet.com/i/tim/2011/02/23/IMG_2143_610x458.JPG
  35. 35. Images• http://cowbgonaca.blogspot.com/2011/06/wallpaper-for-android-mobile.html• http://www.mac-wallpapers.com/Apple-Wallpapers/white-apple-logo-wallpaper/• http://www.laptopsteria.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/blackberry-logo.jpg• http://www.iphonewallpaperblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Windows-7black-iphone4Walpaper.jpg• http://www.mhs.net/locations/PrimaryCareCenters.cfm• http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/pscmisc/vac/us/product_pdfs/Slate_500_Tablet_Datasheet.pdf Images without citations are licensed stock photography
  36. 36. Hot-Button Issues• Will privacy and legal challenges stifle innovation and the delivery of mobile-mediated care to at-risk patient populations?• Could better decisions have been made about study design given the available information at the time?• Will our research result in findings consistent with our research hypotheses and mHealth model assumptions?
  37. 37. Burning Questionsclauson@nova.edu www.unhub.com/kevinclauson

×