• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Making the web work for science - University of Queensland
 

Making the web work for science - University of Queensland

on

  • 2,079 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,079
Views on SlideShare
1,998
Embed Views
81

Actions

Likes
12
Downloads
9
Comments
0

3 Embeds 81

https://twitter.com 79
https://www.rebelmouse.com 1
http://www.google.com 1

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Making the web work for science - University of Queensland Making the web work for science - University of Queensland Presentation Transcript

    • kaitlin thaney @kaythaney ; @mozillascience UQ / 23 june 2014 making the web work for science
    • help researchers use the power of the open web to change science’s future.
    • (0)
    • science is still (largely) rooted in 17th c. practices. (and not in that “retro is cool” sort of way.)
    • early forms of knowledge sharing
    • our current systems are designed to create friction. despite original intentions.
    • What Des-Cartes did was a good step. You have added much several ways, & especially in taking ye colours of thin plates into philosophical consideration. If I have seen further it is by standing on ye shoulders of Giants. - Isaac Newton, 1676 “ “
    • existing system is imperfect
    • traditions last not because they are excellent, but because influential people are averse to change and because of the sheer burdens of transition to a better state ... “ “ Cass Sunstein
    • (1)
    • - access to content, data, code, materials. - emergence of “web-native” tools. - rewards for openness, interop, collaboration, sharing. - push for ROI, reuse, recomputability, transparency. “web-enabled science”
    • research cycle idea experiment lit review materials publish share results retest analyze collect data
    • types of information hypothesis/query protocols parameters content non-digital “stuff” articles proceedings negative results analysis code datasets models (added complexity) prof activities mentorship teaching activities
    • blocking points idea experiment access attaining materials publish share results retest analyze collect data (to name a few ...)
    • “... up to 70% of research from academic labs cannot be reproduced, representing an enormous waste of money and effort.” - Elizabeth Iorns, Science Exchange
    • Source: Michener, 2006 Ecoinformatics.
    • (2)
    • is open enough? what does it mean to “operate on/like the web”?
    • code (interop) community (people) code/data literacy (means to learn/engage)
    • our systems need to talk to one another.
    • “One worry I have is that, with reviews like this, scientists will be even more discouraged from publishing their code [...] We need to get more code out there, not improve how it looks.”
    • code as a research object what’s needed to reuse ?
    • code as a research object http://xkcd.com/285/
    • “There’s greater reward, and more temptation to bend the rules.” - David Resnik, bioethicist
    • (3)
    • is open enough? what does it mean to “operate on/like the web”?
    • “web-enabled science” - access to content, data, code, materials. - emergence of “web-native” tools. - rewards for openness, interop, collaboration, sharing. - push for ROI, reuse, recomputability, transparency.
    • “web-enabled science” what’s missing? - access to content, data, code, materials. - emergence of “web-native” tools. - rewards for openness, interop, collaboration, sharing. - push for ROI, reuse, recomputability, transparency.
    • we need to even (/ elevate) the playing field.
    • facing a digital skills gap
    • “Reliance on ad-hoc, self- education about what’s possible doesn’t scale.” - Selena Decklemann
    • learn from open source (culture as well as technology)
    • current activity: 130+ instructors (60+, training) 3700+ learners
    • we need to build capacity, not just more nodes.
    • instill best (digital, reproducible) practice “research hygiene”
    • in an increasingly digital, data- driven world, what core skills, tools do the next-generation need?
    • education as a means of building community ... globally, as well as across disciplines.
    • (4)
    • shifting practice (and getting it to stick) is challenging. ... but not impossible.
    • disciplines as cultures
    • 63 nations 10,000 scientists 50,000 participants can we do the same for research on the web?
    • tools and technology cultural awareness, best practice connections, open dialogue skills training what are the necessary components?
    • (5)
    • operating in isolation doesn’t scale.
    • coordination and collaboration are key. design for interoperability. remember the non-technical challenges.
    • join us (and the conversation.) teach, contribute, learn. http://software-carpentry.org http://mozillascience.org
    • questions? kaitlin@mozillafoundation.org @kaythaney ; @mozillascience